RFW Updates - statistics
Tanisha Ghai made this Official Information request to Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
The request was partially successful.
From: Tanisha Ghai
Dear Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment,
I would like to post a query regarding "The changes that were applied to RFW following which they are placed in same non-priority as SMC". Question that I would like to ask regarding this change are :
1) What pushed this change i.e. Was there any particular reasons for this change.
2) When this change was pushed, there were multiple RFW applicants who were waiting for 24 months to file RFW application with a talent accredited employer. Now since these applicants were placed in sqm queue as SMC they will be waiting another approximately 20 months (wait time for SMC\RFW applications). Were those applications ever thought to be put into priority queue because they already were waiting for 20\24 months.
3) INZ ops manual A16.1 indicates priorities of applications and one of the clauses mentions about "Residence instructions for holders of work visas granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions (who meet requirements set out in RW2.1)".
Does this also applies to an applicant who has submitted Residence from work and currently is in New Zealand and also earning 90K+ salary. What will be the priority of such applications are they are placed in non-priority queue.
Regards
Tanisha
Yours faithfully,
Tanisha Ghai
From: Ministerial Services
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Ref: 2021-1679
Dear Tanisha,
On behalf of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment I
acknowledge your email of 2 March 2021 requesting under the Official
Information Act 1982 (the Act), the following:
I would like to post a query regarding "The changes that were applied to
RFW following which they are placed in same non-priority as SMC". Question
that I would like to ask regarding this change are :
1) What pushed this change i.e. Was there any particular reasons for this
change.
2) When this change was pushed, there were multiple RFW applicants who
were waiting for 24 months to file RFW application with a talent
accredited employer. Now since these applicants were placed in sqm queue
as SMC they will be waiting another approximately 20 months (wait time for
SMC\RFW applications). Were those applications ever thought to be put into
priority queue because they already were waiting for 20\24 months.
3) INZ ops manual A16.1 indicates priorities of applications and one of
the clauses mentions about "Residence instructions for holders of work
visas granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions
(who meet requirements set out in RW2.1)".
Does this also applies to an applicant who has submitted Residence from
work and currently is in New Zealand and also earning 90K+ salary. What
will be the priority of such applications are they are placed in
non-priority queue.
Your request is being processed in accordance with the Act and a response
will be sent to you in due course.
If you have any enquiries regarding your request, or its urgency, feel
free to contact us via email at [1][MBIE request email].
Nāku noa, nā
MINISTERIAL SERVICES
Corporate, Governance and Information
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
Level 4, 15 Stout Street, PO Box 1473, Wellington 6140
NZBN 9429000106078
[2]www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. This message and any
files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use is strictly
prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the message and any
attachment from your computer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[MBIE request email]
2. http://www.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
From: Margee DO
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Kia Ora Tanisha
Please note that the Ministry will respond to this query directly. Therefore, please note that we are cancelling this Official information request.
A Ministry staff will be in touch about this.
Sincerely,
Margee Do
Senior Advisor
Business Management, Immigration New Zealand
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
[email address] |
Level 1, 15 Stout Street, PO Box 1473, Wellington, New Zealand
NZBN 9429000106078
-----Original Message-----
From: Tanisha Ghai <[FOI #14807 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2021 2:21 PM
To: *OIA <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - RFW Updates - statistics
Dear Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment,
I would like to post a query regarding "The changes that were applied to RFW following which they are placed in same non-priority as SMC". Question that I would like to ask regarding this change are :
1) What pushed this change i.e. Was there any particular reasons for this change.
2) When this change was pushed, there were multiple RFW applicants who were waiting for 24 months to file RFW application with a talent accredited employer. Now since these applicants were placed in sqm queue as SMC they will be waiting another approximately 20 months (wait time for SMC\RFW applications). Were those applications ever thought to be put into priority queue because they already were waiting for 20\24 months.
3) INZ ops manual A16.1 indicates priorities of applications and one of the clauses mentions about "Residence instructions for holders of work visas granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions (who meet requirements set out in RW2.1)".
Does this also applies to an applicant who has submitted Residence from work and currently is in New Zealand and also earning 90K+ salary. What will be the priority of such applications are they are placed in non-priority queue.
Regards
Tanisha
Yours faithfully,
Tanisha Ghai
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #14807 email]
Is [MBIE request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz <http://www.govt.nz/> - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government services
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the message and any attachment from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: INZ BVO Ops Response
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Dear Mrs Ghai
I am writing in response to your email in regards to the changes to the
prioritisation of residence processing as general correspondence.
Over the last two to three of years, demand for the Skilled Migrant
Category (SMC) and Residence from Work sub-stream (RFW) has risen
significantly. This resulted in longer decision times for applicants.
To better manage the queue of residence applications going forward, in
February 2020 Immigration New Zealand (INZ), with the endorsement of the
Minister of Immigration at the time, formalised the priority allocation of
some SMC and RFW applications for highly paid applicants and applicants
with current occupational registration (where registration is required by
immigration instructions). This allowed Immigration New Zealand to start
allocating older, non-priority applications on a more consistent basis.
This information was published on the INZ website at the time
[1]https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us...
The specific immigration instructions (A16.1) can be found at the
following link. Please choose the 'administration' section for the
relevant information
[2]https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us...
. There have been six changes to A16.1 since the Immigration Act 2009
came into effect in 2010.
Applications from the non-priority queue are allocated and processed in
date order of lodgement. However, A16.1 (f) does allow the allocation of
other applications when individual circumstances warrant this. This
includes applications returned by the Immigration Protection Tribunal
(IPT) for re-assessment, applications requiring reassignment due to staff
movement, and those escalated through the Employment Visa Escalation (EVE)
process. If you consider that your application should be prioritised,
please use this process. Information about the EVE process can be found
at the following link
[3]www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/media-centre/newsletters/korero/korero-july-2019/employment-visa-escalations-eve
Any updates in regards to the allocation of applications can be found at
the following link
[4]www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/media-centre/news-notifications/how-we-prioritise-resident-visa-applications/smc-and-rfw-timeframe-information
Regards
Penny Hazlett
SENIOR BUSINESS ADVISOR, OPERATIONS SUPPORT
Border & Visa Operations, Immigration New Zealand
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
[5][email address] | Telephone: +64 4 896 5378|
Level 1, 15 Stout Street, PO Box 1473, Wellington, New Zealand
-----Original Message-----
From: Tanisha Ghai <[FYI request #14807 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2021 2:21 pm
To: *OIA <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - RFW Updates - statistics
Dear Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment,
I would like to post a query regarding "The changes that were applied to
RFW following which they are placed in same non-priority as SMC". Question
that I would like to ask regarding this change are :
1) What pushed this change i.e. Was there any particular reasons for this
change.
2) When this change was pushed, there were multiple RFW applicants who
were waiting for 24 months to file RFW application with a talent
accredited employer. Now since these applicants were placed in sqm queue
as SMC they will be waiting another approximately 20 months (wait time for
SMC\RFW applications). Were those applications ever thought to be put into
priority queue because they already were waiting for 20\24 months.
3) INZ ops manual A16.1 indicates priorities of applications and one of
the clauses mentions about "Residence instructions for holders of work
visas granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions
(who meet requirements set out in RW2.1)".
Does this also applies to an applicant who has submitted Residence from
work and currently is in New Zealand and also earning 90K+ salary. What
will be the priority of such applications are they are placed in
non-priority queue.
Regards
Tanisha
Yours faithfully,
Tanisha Ghai
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[6][FYI request #14807 email]
Is [7][MBIE request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests
to Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment? If so, please
contact us using this form:
[8]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[9]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[10]www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. This message and any
files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use is strictly
prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the message and any
attachment from your computer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us...
2. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us...
3. http://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/...
4. http://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/...
5. mailto:[email address]
6. mailto:[FYI request #14807 email]
7. mailto:[MBIE request email]
8. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
9. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
10. http://www.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
From: Tanisha Ghai
Dear INZ BVO Ops Response,
Thanks for answering my query although it would be great if I can get clarity on the third point in my original query:
INZ ops manual A16.1 indicates priorities of applications and one of the clauses mentions about "Residence instructions for holders of work visas granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions (who meet requirements set out in RW2.1)".
Does this also applies to an applicant who has submitted Residence from work and currently is in New Zealand and also earning 90K+ salary. What will be the priority of such applications are they are placed in non-priority queue.
To provide more details the query is regarding v point in the A16.1 first clause.
Yours sincerely,
Tanisha Ghai
From: INZ BVO Ops Response
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Dear Tanisha
Please refer to the link to the immigration instructions that I provided
you below. A16.1 does not include the reference that you have provided.
The current priorisation re SMC and RFW as per A16.1 has been in place
since February 2020. All of the previous 'versions' since 2010 do not
have this reference. When the RFW categories were included as a priority
the names of the categories were stated and not the actual immigration
instruction. Please refer to the below version of A16.1 from 29 November
2010. The prioritisation as per A16.1 applies to all applicants.
16.1 General Instructions as to the order and manner
of processing residence applications (29/11/2010)
See also Immigration Act 2009 ss 26(4), 411
Pursuant to section 26(4) of the Immigration Act
2009 and acting under delegated authority from the
Chief Executive of the Department of Labour, I
hereby give the following general instructions as to
the order and manner of processing residence class
visa applications under Government residence
instructions:
a. First priority will be given to the following
types and categories of applications for residence
class visas in preference to applications under
other types and categories:
i.Skilled
Migrant Category (SMC) applications with job offers
will have priority;
ii.All business
categories;
iii.Residence from
Work category applications :
o Talent (Accredited Employer);
o Talent (Arts, Culture and Sport);
o Long Term Skill Shortage List;
iv.Refugee Policy;
v.Partnership and
Dependent Child applications where the partner or
sponsor is,
o a New Zealand citizen, or
o the holder of a permanent resident visa, and who
has been absent from New Zealand for a period of at
least two years prior to the date of the application
being accepted for consideration apart from short
visits within that period. (Note that in the case of
a partnership application the New Zealand partner
and the applicant must have been living together for
12 months or more in a partnership that is genuine
and stable).
b. Second priority will be given to the following
types and categories of applications for residence
class visas :
i.Partnership
and Dependent Child applications (other than those
in instruction (a)).
c. Third Priority will be given to the following
types and categories of applications for residence
class visas:
i.Parent
category;
ii.Adult Sibling
and Adult Child category.
d. These instructions do not prevent immigration
officers according urgency to the processing of any
particular residence class visa application when the
individual circumstances so warrant that.
e. The previous General Instructions made pursuant
to section 13BA of the Immigration Act 1987 are
revoked.
Regards
Penny Hazlett
SENIOR BUSINESS ADVISOR, OPERATIONS SUPPORT
-----Original Message-----
From: Tanisha Ghai <[FYI request #14807 email]>
Sent: Friday, 19 March 2021 11:15 am
To: INZ BVO Ops Response <[email address]>
Subject: RE: Official Information request - RFW Updates - statistics
Dear INZ BVO Ops Response,
Thanks for answering my query although it would be great if I can get
clarity on the third point in my original query:
INZ ops manual A16.1 indicates priorities of applications and one of the
clauses mentions about "Residence instructions for holders of work visas
granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions (who
meet requirements set out in RW2.1)".
Does this also applies to an applicant who has submitted Residence from
work and currently is in New Zealand and also earning 90K+ salary. What
will be the priority of such applications are they are placed in
non-priority queue.
To provide more details the query is regarding v point in the A16.1 first
clause.
Yours sincerely,
Tanisha Ghai
-----Original Message-----
Dear Mrs Ghai
I am writing in response to your email in regards to the changes to the
prioritisation of residence processing as general correspondence.
Over the last two to three of years, demand for the Skilled Migrant
Category (SMC) and Residence from Work sub-stream (RFW) has risen
significantly. This resulted in longer decision times for applicants.
To better manage the queue of residence applications going forward, in
February 2020 Immigration New Zealand (INZ), with the endorsement of the
Minister of Immigration at the time, formalised the priority allocation
of some SMC and RFW applications for highly paid applicants and
applicants with current occupational registration (where registration is
required by immigration instructions). This allowed Immigration New
Zealand to start allocating older, non-priority applications on a more
consistent basis.
This information was published on the INZ website at the time
[1][1]https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us....
The specific immigration instructions (A16.1) can be found at the
following link. Please choose the 'administration' section for the
relevant information
[2][2]https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us...
. There have been six changes to A16.1 since the Immigration Act 2009
came into effect in 2010.
Applications from the non-priority queue are allocated and processed in
date order of lodgement. However, A16.1 (f) does allow the allocation of
other applications when individual circumstances warrant this. This
includes applications returned by the Immigration Protection Tribunal
(IPT) for re-assessment, applications requiring reassignment due to staff
movement, and those escalated through the Employment Visa Escalation
(EVE) process. If you consider that your application should be
prioritised, please use this process. Information about the EVE process
can be found at the following link
[3][3]www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/media-centre/newsletters/korero/korero-july-2019/employment-visa-escalations-eve
Any updates in regards to the allocation of applications can be found at
the following link
[4][4]www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/media-centre/news-notifications/how-we-prioritise-resident-visa-applications/smc-and-rfw-timeframe-information
Regards
Penny Hazlett
SENIOR BUSINESS ADVISOR, OPERATIONS SUPPORT
Border & Visa Operations, Immigration New Zealand
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
[5][email address] | Telephone: +64 4 896 5378|
Level 1, 15 Stout Street, PO Box 1473, Wellington, New Zealand
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[5][FYI request #14807 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[6]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[7]www.govt.nz - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government
services
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. This message and any
files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person
responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use is strictly
prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the message and any
attachment from your computer.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us...
2. https://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us...
3. http://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/...
4. http://www.immigration.govt.nz/about-us/...
5. mailto:[FYI request #14807 email]
6. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
7. http://www.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
From: Tanisha Ghai
Dear INZ BVO Ops Response,
Thanks for your reply to the query, the ops manual I am referring to is at link https://www.immigration.govt.nz/opsmanua...
To be more specific I am referring to A16.1 updated on "3rd November 2020" further down at :
A16.1 {a{v}} which is :
Applications for a permanent resident visa under the following instructions:
Residence instructions for holders of work visas granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions (who meet requirements set out in RW2.1)
I am still not sure regarding reference to 2010 prioritization criteria as we have just applied residency this year, instructions from 2010 would be irrelevant in this situation.
Yours sincerely,
Tanisha Ghai
From: INZ BVO Ops Response
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
Dear Tanisha
That is applications for PRV and not Skilled Residence. I was referring to the skilled residence prioritisation
As per my initial email, if you consider that your application meets priority under A16 please use the EVE process to submit your case and the reasons as to why your application should be prioritiese.
Regards
Penny Hazlett
SENIOR BUSINESS ADVISOR, OPERATIONS SUPPORT
-----Original Message-----
From: Tanisha Ghai <[FYI request #14807 email]>
Sent: Friday, 19 March 2021 12:23 pm
To: INZ BVO Ops Response <[email address]>
Subject: RE: Official Information request - RFW Updates - statistics
Dear INZ BVO Ops Response,
Thanks for your reply to the query, the ops manual I am referring to is at link https://www.immigration.govt.nz/opsmanua...
To be more specific I am referring to A16.1 updated on "3rd November 2020" further down at :
A16.1 {a{v}} which is :
Applications for a permanent resident visa under the following instructions:
Residence instructions for holders of work visas granted under the Talent (Accredited Employers) work instructions (who meet requirements set out in RW2.1)
I am still not sure regarding reference to 2010 prioritization criteria as we have just applied residency this year, instructions from 2010 would be irrelevant in this situation.
Yours sincerely,
Tanisha Ghai
-----Original Message-----
Dear Tanisha
Please refer to the link to the immigration instructions that I provided you below. A16.1 does not include the reference that you have provided. The current priorisation re SMC and RFW as per A16.1 has been in place since February 2020. All of the previous 'versions' since 2010 do not have this reference. When the RFW categories were included as a priority the names of the categories were stated and not the actual immigration instruction. Please refer to the below version of A16.1 from 29 November 2010. The prioritisation as per A16.1 applies to all applicants.
16.1 General Instructions as to the order and manner of processing residence applications (29/11/2010)
See also Immigration Act 2009 ss 26(4), 411
Pursuant to section 26(4) of the Immigration Act
2009 and acting under delegated authority from the Chief Executive of the Department of Labour, I hereby give the following general instructions as to the order and manner of processing residence class visa applications under Government residence
instructions:
a. First priority will be given to the following types and categories of applications for residence class visas in preference to applications under other types and categories:
i.Skilled Migrant Category (SMC) applications with job offers will have priority;
ii.All business categories;
iii.Residence from Work category applications :
o Talent (Accredited Employer);
o Talent (Arts, Culture and Sport);
o Long Term Skill Shortage List;
iv.Refugee Policy;
v.Partnership and Dependent Child applications where the partner or sponsor is,
o a New Zealand citizen, or
o the holder of a permanent resident visa, and who has been absent from New Zealand for a period of at least two years prior to the date of the application being accepted for consideration apart from short visits within that period. (Note that in the case of a partnership application the New Zealand partner and the applicant must have been living together for
12 months or more in a partnership that is genuine and stable).
b. Second priority will be given to the following types and categories of applications for residence class visas :
i.Partnership and Dependent Child applications (other than those in instruction (a)).
c. Third Priority will be given to the following types and categories of applications for residence class visas:
i.Parent category;
ii.Adult Sibling and Adult Child category.
d. These instructions do not prevent immigration officers according urgency to the processing of any particular residence class visa application when the individual circumstances so warrant that.
e. The previous General Instructions made pursuant to section 13BA of the Immigration Act 1987 are revoked.
Regards
Penny Hazlett
SENIOR BUSINESS ADVISOR, OPERATIONS SUPPORT
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FYI request #14807 email]
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
www.govt.nz <http://www.govt.nz/> - your guide to finding and using New Zealand government services
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any opinions expressed in this message are not necessarily those of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivery to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use is strictly prohibited. Please contact the sender and delete the message and any attachment from your computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hide quoted sections
From: Tanisha Ghai
Dear INZ BVO Ops Response,
Thanks for the above reply, this request is not regarding my application being under priority or non-priority. This ops manual entry is a little confusing for me, I am just trying to understand the prioritization criteria defined in OPS manual.
The above criteria under priority being assigned for PRV :
Does this only apply if applicant is outside New Zealand ?
If this is the case : Why was this criteria added in "November 2020" to ops manual when all offshore applications were closed. What will this criteria prioritize till offshore applications are closed.
Yours sincerely,
Tanisha Ghai
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence