Peter Ellis Case
Ross Francis made this Official Information request to Crown Law Office
The request was refused by Crown Law Office.
From: Ross Francis
Dear Crown Law Office,
I have the following request for information.
At paragraph 3 of his second affidavit into the Peter Ellis case, an affidavit that was submitted to the Court of Appeal, Dr Michael Lamb states:
“Dr. [Constance] Dalenberg summarizes her qualifications in paragraphs 1 through 7 of her affidavit, but a conventional curriculum vitae was not appended. References to the large number of research projects in which she has participated were thus unaccompanied by details concerning her contributions to the peer-reviewed professional literature. A computer-assisted search of both the medical and social science literatures on June 12, 1999 identified 14 publications since 1984. None of these publications were about interviewing young child abuse victims. Her curriculum vitae, obtained independently, likewise identified no publications concerned with forensic interviews of young alleged victims.”
Meanwhile, Dr Dalenberg told the Court of Appeal that her research on the relationship between fantasy and abuse had been published as a chapter in the Handbook of Interviewing (1999). Her chapter was about adult Holocaust survivors and did not cite her research on fantasy. Maggie Bruck advised the appellate Court that Dalenberg’s research on fantasy and abuse would not be accepted by a scientific peer-reviewed journal. She confirmed that it had been published in a professional newsletter.
What background checks (if any) did Crow Law carry out on Dr Dalenberg before it hired her? Was Crown Law aware that she had published no research into the interviewing of young child abuse victims? Did it ask Dr Dalenberg to amend any inaccuracies in her first affidavit? If so, what inaccuracies did Crown Law wish to have corrected? Please supply me with all information held by Crown Law about Dr Dalenberg at the time of her hiring.
At paragraph 10.2 of her first affidavit, Dr Dalenberg says “Lamb and Parsonson rarely mention that in the studies that show that children are quite suggestible, the children are often told that a trusted adult knows for certain that the ‘perpetrator’ committed the specific act, or that another adult was there at the time and knows that an event occurred”. What studies (if any) was Dr Dalenberg referring to when she made that comment?
In 2000, when Crown Law nominated Thomas Lyon, Gail Goodman and Karen Saywitz as its experts for the Ministerial Inquiry into the Peter Ellis case, what factors influenced Crown Law’s decision to overlook Dr Dalenberg? Please provide me with all records held by Crown Law about Thomas Lyon, Gail Goodman and Karen Saywitz between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2000.
Yours faithfully,
Ross Francis
From: OIA
Crown Law Office
Good Afternoon,
Please find the attached correspondence in relation to your request for information under the official information act 1982.
Kind Regards,
Crown Law Te Tari Ture o te Karauna
P O Box 2858 or DX SP20208 | Level 3 Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street | Wellington 6011
www.crownlaw.govt.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: Ross Francis [mailto:[FOI #8647 email]]
Sent: Monday, 10 September 2018 6:55 AM
To: OIA; Zoe Yeandle; Hayley Betteridge; Samantha Perkovic
Subject: Official Information request - Peter Ellis Case
Dear Crown Law Office,
I have the following request for information.
At paragraph 3 of his second affidavit into the Peter Ellis case, an affidavit that was submitted to the Court of Appeal, Dr Michael Lamb states:
“Dr. [Constance] Dalenberg summarizes her qualifications in paragraphs 1 through 7 of her affidavit, but a conventional curriculum vitae was not appended. References to the large number of research projects in which she has participated were thus unaccompanied by details concerning her contributions to the peer-reviewed professional literature. A computer-assisted search of both the medical and social science literatures on June 12, 1999 identified 14 publications since 1984. None of these publications were about interviewing young child abuse victims. Her curriculum vitae, obtained independently, likewise identified no publications concerned with forensic interviews of young alleged victims.”
Meanwhile, Dr Dalenberg told the Court of Appeal that her research on the relationship between fantasy and abuse had been published as a chapter in the Handbook of Interviewing (1999). Her chapter was about adult Holocaust survivors and did not cite her research on fantasy. Maggie Bruck advised the appellate Court that Dalenberg’s research on fantasy and abuse would not be accepted by a scientific peer-reviewed journal. She confirmed that it had been published in a professional newsletter.
What background checks (if any) did Crow Law carry out on Dr Dalenberg before it hired her? Was Crown Law aware that she had published no research into the interviewing of young child abuse victims? Did it ask Dr Dalenberg to amend any inaccuracies in her first affidavit? If so, what inaccuracies did Crown Law wish to have corrected? Please supply me with all information held by Crown Law about Dr Dalenberg at the time of her hiring.
At paragraph 10.2 of her first affidavit, Dr Dalenberg says “Lamb and Parsonson rarely mention that in the studies that show that children are quite suggestible, the children are often told that a trusted adult knows for certain that the ‘perpetrator’ committed the specific act, or that another adult was there at the time and knows that an event occurred”. What studies (if any) was Dr Dalenberg referring to when she made that comment?
In 2000, when Crown Law nominated Thomas Lyon, Gail Goodman and Karen Saywitz as its experts for the Ministerial Inquiry into the Peter Ellis case, what factors influenced Crown Law’s decision to overlook Dr Dalenberg? Please provide me with all records held by Crown Law about Thomas Lyon, Gail Goodman and Karen Saywitz between 1 January 2000 and 31 July 2000.
Yours faithfully,
Ross Francis
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #8647 email]
Is [Crown Law Office request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Crown Law Office? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Confidentiality Notice: This email may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by mistake, please:
(a) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply from your system; (b) do not act on this email in any other way. Thank you.
***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************
hide quoted sections
From: OIA
Crown Law Office
Good Morning,
Please find the attached correspondence in relation to your request for
information under the Official Information Act 1982.
Kind Regards
Crown Law Te Tari Ture o te Karauna
P O Box 2858 or DX SP20208 | Level 3 Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street |
Wellington 6011
[1]www.crownlaw.govt.nz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: This email may contain information that is
confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by mistake,
please:
(a) reply promptly to that effect, and remove this email and the reply
from your system; (b) do not act on this email in any other way. Thank
you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. http://www.crownlaw.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence