Official Information Act 1982 request: communications with B416 and its members
Joshua Riley made this Official Information request to Christopher Luxon
Response to this request is delayed. By law, Christopher Luxon should normally have responded promptly and by (details and exceptions)
From: Joshua Riley
This request concerns the Prime Minister's responsibilities as Prime Minister
(including any advice, correspondence or communications received or sent in that
capacity). It is not limited to a single portfolio where the information relates to
the matters described below.
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request the following:
All communications — including but not limited to emails, text/SMS messages, instant
or direct messages on any platform (including but not limited to Signal, WhatsApp,
Messenger and iMessage), letters, briefings, aide-mémoire, meeting invitations, calendar
entries, meeting notes, minutes and file notes — sent to, sent by, or copying he Prime Minister, Rt Hon Christopher Luxon, and/or any member of his ministerial staff (including his Chief of Staff),
on the one hand, and any of the following on the other hand:
• B416 (including the B416 campaign/organisation);
• Cecilia Robinson;
• Anna Mowbray;
• Anna Curzon;
• Blair Knight;
• Malindi MacLean;
• any other director, officer, employee, member, representative or agent of B416;
• the author and the presenter of the aide-mémoire provided to the Prime Minister
on or about 17 April 2025 concerning restricting social media access for under-16s.
Period: 1 January 2025 to the date this request is processed.
For the avoidance of doubt, this request specifically includes:
1. communications held on personal devices or personal accounts that relate to official
business (consistent with the Ombudsman's guidance that the medium does not determine
whether information is "official information");
2. the aide-mémoire of on or about 17 April 2025, together with any drafts, attachments
and related correspondence;
3. internal communications among Ministers, ministerial staff and/or officials that
forward, discuss or respond to any communication from or about B416 or its members;
4. records of telephone calls or meetings (including calendar entries and notes)
involving any of the above parties.
These are five separate requests to five separate holders (the Office of the Prime Minister, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Hon Erica Stanford, the Ministry of Education, and the Department of Internal Affairs), each of which holds distinct information. I ask that this request be answered on the basis of the information held by the agency/office to which it is addressed, and
not consolidated with, or transferred wholesale to, another agency for a single combined
response. I accept that section 14 may require transferring specific information that is
held by, or more closely connected to, another agency; where that occurs, please notify
me which information has been transferred, to whom, and the basis for it, and answer the
remainder yourself.
I anticipate that s9(2)(a) may be considered. I note that it is subject to the
public-interest test in s9(1). These are communications between Ministers/officials and
an organised group lobbying to shape legislation — a matter in which the public interest
in disclosure is high — and the individuals concerned have advocated publicly on this
issue, including a public launch event with the Prime Minister, so any privacy interest
is limited. Comparable material has already been released under the OIA. Where any
genuinely personal detail (for example, a private phone number) is present, I ask that
it be redacted rather than used to withhold entire communications. On balance, I consider
that the public interest favours release.
If any part of this request is refused, please cite the specific section of the Act
relied on and release the balance. If you consider the request too large or insufficiently
particular, please contact me to refine it (rather than declining under section 18(f)).
I would appreciate a response in electronic form within the statutory 20 working days.
Please contact me if any aspect needs clarification.
From: Christopher Luxon (MIN)
Christopher Luxon
On behalf of the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Rt Hon Christopher Luxon,
thank you for your email. Please accept this as acknowledgement that your
message has been received.
While all emails are read and considered, due to the very high volume of
messages sent to the Prime Minister, it is not always possible to provide
a personal reply.
If the subject of your email is closely related to another ministerial
portfolio, we may refer you to the Minister who will be best placed to
review your message. If you have already copied your email to a Minister
or agency responsible for the issue you have raised, your message will be
noted.
If you are a Botany resident writing about a local issue or a constituent
matter, or you are writing to Rt Hon Christopher Luxon in his capacity as
the MP for Botany, please contact the Botany Electorate Office at
[1][email address].
If your email is an invitation, a media query, or a request under the
Official Information Act, you will receive a further response in due
course.
Thank you again for taking the time to write.
Kind regards,
Office of Rt Hon Christopher Luxon
Prime Minister of New Zealand
Minister for National Security and Intelligence
Minister Responsible for Ministerial Services
Leader of the National Party
Member of Parliament for Botany
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
From: Rt Hon Christopher Luxon
Kia ora Joshua,
Thank you for your email received 23^rd June 2026, in which you submitted
an Official Information Act request as follows:
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request the following:
All communications — including but not limited to emails, text/SMS
messages, instant
or direct messages on any platform (including but not limited to Signal,
WhatsApp,
Messenger and iMessage), letters, briefings, aide-mémoire, meeting
invitations, calendar
entries, meeting notes, minutes and file notes — sent to, sent by, or
copying he Prime Minister, Rt Hon Christopher Luxon, and/or any member of
his ministerial staff (including his Chief of Staff),
on the one hand, and any of the following on the other hand:
• B416 (including the B416 campaign/organisation);
• Cecilia Robinson;
• Anna Mowbray;
• Anna Curzon;
• Blair Knight;
• Malindi MacLean;
• any other director, officer, employee, member, representative or agent
of B416;
• the author and the presenter of the aide-mémoire provided to the Prime
Minister
on or about 17 April 2025 concerning restricting social media access
for under-16s.
Period: 1 January 2025 to the date this request is processed.
For the avoidance of doubt, this request specifically includes:
1. communications held on personal devices or personal accounts that
relate to official
business (consistent with the Ombudsman's guidance that the medium
does not determine
whether information is "official information");
2. the aide-mémoire of on or about 17 April 2025, together with any
drafts, attachments
and related correspondence;
3. internal communications among Ministers, ministerial staff and/or
officials that
forward, discuss or respond to any communication from or about B416
or its members;
4. records of telephone calls or meetings (including calendar entries
and notes)
involving any of the above parties.
These are five separate requests to five separate holders (the Office of
the Prime Minister, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Hon
Erica Stanford, the Ministry of Education, and the Department of Internal
Affairs), each of which holds distinct information. I ask that this
request be answered on the basis of the information held by the
agency/office to which it is addressed, and
not consolidated with, or transferred wholesale to, another agency for a
single combined
response. I accept that section 14 may require transferring specific
information that is
held by, or more closely connected to, another agency; where that occurs,
please notify
me which information has been transferred, to whom, and the basis for it,
and answer the
remainder yourself.
I anticipate that s9(2)(a) may be considered. I note that it is subject to
the
public-interest test in s9(1). These are communications between
Ministers/officials and
an organised group lobbying to shape legislation — a matter in which the
public interest
in disclosure is high — and the individuals concerned have advocated
publicly on this
issue, including a public launch event with the Prime Minister, so any
privacy interest
is limited. Comparable material has already been released under the OIA.
Where any
genuinely personal detail (for example, a private phone number) is
present, I ask that
it be redacted rather than used to withhold entire communications. On
balance, I consider
that the public interest favours release.
If any part of this request is refused, please cite the specific section
of the Act
relied on and release the balance. If you consider the request too large
or insufficiently
particular, please contact me to refine it (rather than declining under
section 18(f)).
Your request is being considered in accordance with the Act, and you can
expect a response by 22^nd July 2026 (date determined by the [1]OIA
calculator).
Ngâ mihi nui
Sonya Ford
Correspondence Lead Advisor | Office of Rt Hon Christopher Luxon
Prime Minister
Minister for National Security and Intelligence
Minister Responsible for Ministerial Services
Private Bag 18041, Parliament Buildings, Wellington 6160, New Zealand
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Joshua Riley <[2][FOI #34945 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2026 4:57 PM
To: Christopher Luxon (MIN) <[3][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Official Information Act 1982
request: communications with B416 and its members
This request concerns the Prime Minister's responsibilities as Prime
Minister
(including any advice, correspondence or communications received or sent
in that
capacity). It is not limited to a single portfolio where the information
relates to
the matters described below.
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request the following:
All communications — including but not limited to emails, text/SMS
messages, instant
or direct messages on any platform (including but not limited to Signal,
WhatsApp,
Messenger and iMessage), letters, briefings, aide-mémoire, meeting
invitations, calendar
entries, meeting notes, minutes and file notes — sent to, sent by, or
copying he Prime Minister, Rt Hon Christopher Luxon, and/or any member of
his ministerial staff (including his Chief of Staff),
on the one hand, and any of the following on the other hand:
• B416 (including the B416 campaign/organisation);
• Cecilia Robinson;
• Anna Mowbray;
• Anna Curzon;
• Blair Knight;
• Malindi MacLean;
• any other director, officer, employee, member, representative or agent
of B416;
• the author and the presenter of the aide-mémoire provided to the Prime
Minister
on or about 17 April 2025 concerning restricting social media access
for under-16s.
Period: 1 January 2025 to the date this request is processed.
For the avoidance of doubt, this request specifically includes:
1. communications held on personal devices or personal accounts that
relate to official
business (consistent with the Ombudsman's guidance that the medium
does not determine
whether information is "official information");
2. the aide-mémoire of on or about 17 April 2025, together with any
drafts, attachments
and related correspondence;
3. internal communications among Ministers, ministerial staff and/or
officials that
forward, discuss or respond to any communication from or about B416
or its members;
4. records of telephone calls or meetings (including calendar entries
and notes)
involving any of the above parties.
These are five separate requests to five separate holders (the Office of
the Prime Minister, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Hon
Erica Stanford, the Ministry of Education, and the Department of Internal
Affairs), each of which holds distinct information. I ask that this
request be answered on the basis of the information held by the
agency/office to which it is addressed, and
not consolidated with, or transferred wholesale to, another agency for a
single combined
response. I accept that section 14 may require transferring specific
information that is
held by, or more closely connected to, another agency; where that occurs,
please notify
me which information has been transferred, to whom, and the basis for it,
and answer the
remainder yourself.
I anticipate that s9(2)(a) may be considered. I note that it is subject to
the
public-interest test in s9(1). These are communications between
Ministers/officials and
an organised group lobbying to shape legislation — a matter in which the
public interest
in disclosure is high — and the individuals concerned have advocated
publicly on this
issue, including a public launch event with the Prime Minister, so any
privacy interest
is limited. Comparable material has already been released under the OIA.
Where any
genuinely personal detail (for example, a private phone number) is
present, I ask that
it be redacted rather than used to withhold entire communications. On
balance, I consider
that the public interest favours release.
If any part of this request is refused, please cite the specific section
of the Act
relied on and release the balance. If you consider the request too large
or insufficiently
particular, please contact me to refine it (rather than declining under
section 18(f)).
I would appreciate a response in electronic form within the statutory 20
working days.
Please contact me if any aspect needs clarification.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #34945 email]
Is [5][Christopher Luxon request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Christopher Luxon? If so, please contact us using this form:
[6]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://fyi....
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[7]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://fyi....
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/agen...
2. mailto:[FOI #34945 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[FOI #34945 email]
5. mailto:[Christopher Luxon request email]
6. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/fyi.o...
7. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/fyi.o...
From: Sarah Boyle
Tēnā koe Joshua,
Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA).
Following an initial assessment, we are seeking clarification and
refinement of parts of your request. As currently framed, it appears to
seek all communications of the kinds listed in your request between the
Prime Minister or his office and the named individuals/entities,
irrespective of the subject matter, and including where any ministerial
staff member in this office may have been copied into such communications,
during the period 1 January 2025 to 23 June 2026.
As your request does not specify a particular subject matter, we will need
to search using the names of the individuals and entities identified. This
will allow us to identify any relevant:
o emails received or sent by the Prime Minister or his office during the
specified period; and
o formal advice, briefings, aides-mémoire, correspondence, and other
documents received by the Prime Minister or his office during that
period.
Other records, such as text messages, instant or direct messages on
various platforms, and phone calls are not centrally searchable. While key
records are retained in accordance with the Public Records Act 2005, your
request appears to seek all communications, regardless of their nature or
significance. Therefore, identifying and reviewing any material
potentially relevant to your request for a period of almost 18 months
would likely require substantial collation or research, engaging section
18(f) of the OIA.
Consistent with section 18B of the OIA, we are consulting with you to
determine whether the request can be refined to avoid the potential
application of section 18(f). Would you be willing to refine your request
so that it is limited to:
o emails received or sent by the Prime Minister or his office during the
specified period; and
o formal advice, briefings, aides-mémoire, correspondence, and other
documents received by the Prime Minister or his office during that
period?
We note also that your request does not provide an exhaustive list of
names. To help us identify all potentially relevant information, could you
please specify who you mean by:
o “any other director, officer, employee, member, representative, or
agent of B416”; and
o “the author and presenter of the aide-mémoire provided to the Prime
Minister on or about 17 April 2025 concerning restricting social media
access for under-16s”?
Please note that if you refine or clarify your request, we may treat the
refined request as a new request for the purposes of calculating the
statutory timeframe, consistent with section 15(1AA) of the OIA.
We would appreciate your reply by Friday, 3 July 2026.
Get [1]Outlook for iOS
------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Joshua Riley <[2][FOI #34945 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2026 4:57 PM
To: Christopher Luxon (MIN) <[3][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Official Information Act 1982
request: communications with B416 and its members
This request concerns the Prime Minister's responsibilities as Prime
Minister
(including any advice, correspondence or communications received or sent
in that
capacity). It is not limited to a single portfolio where the information
relates to
the matters described below.
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request the following:
All communications — including but not limited to emails, text/SMS
messages, instant
or direct messages on any platform (including but not limited to Signal,
WhatsApp,
Messenger and iMessage), letters, briefings, aide-mémoire, meeting
invitations, calendar
entries, meeting notes, minutes and file notes — sent to, sent by, or
copying he Prime Minister, Rt Hon Christopher Luxon, and/or any member of
his ministerial staff (including his Chief of Staff),
on the one hand, and any of the following on the other hand:
• B416 (including the B416 campaign/organisation);
• Cecilia Robinson;
• Anna Mowbray;
• Anna Curzon;
• Blair Knight;
• Malindi MacLean;
• any other director, officer, employee, member, representative or agent
of B416;
• the author and the presenter of the aide-mémoire provided to the Prime
Minister
on or about 17 April 2025 concerning restricting social media access
for under-16s.
Period: 1 January 2025 to the date this request is processed.
For the avoidance of doubt, this request specifically includes:
1. communications held on personal devices or personal accounts that
relate to official
business (consistent with the Ombudsman's guidance that the medium
does not determine
whether information is "official information");
2. the aide-mémoire of on or about 17 April 2025, together with any
drafts, attachments
and related correspondence;
3. internal communications among Ministers, ministerial staff and/or
officials that
forward, discuss or respond to any communication from or about B416
or its members;
4. records of telephone calls or meetings (including calendar entries
and notes)
involving any of the above parties.
These are five separate requests to five separate holders (the Office of
the Prime Minister, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Hon
Erica Stanford, the Ministry of Education, and the Department of Internal
Affairs), each of which holds distinct information. I ask that this
request be answered on the basis of the information held by the
agency/office to which it is addressed, and
not consolidated with, or transferred wholesale to, another agency for a
single combined
response. I accept that section 14 may require transferring specific
information that is
held by, or more closely connected to, another agency; where that occurs,
please notify
me which information has been transferred, to whom, and the basis for it,
and answer the
remainder yourself.
I anticipate that s9(2)(a) may be considered. I note that it is subject to
the
public-interest test in s9(1). These are communications between
Ministers/officials and
an organised group lobbying to shape legislation — a matter in which the
public interest
in disclosure is high — and the individuals concerned have advocated
publicly on this
issue, including a public launch event with the Prime Minister, so any
privacy interest
is limited. Comparable material has already been released under the OIA.
Where any
genuinely personal detail (for example, a private phone number) is
present, I ask that
it be redacted rather than used to withhold entire communications. On
balance, I consider
that the public interest favours release.
If any part of this request is refused, please cite the specific section
of the Act
relied on and release the balance. If you consider the request too large
or insufficiently
particular, please contact me to refine it (rather than declining under
section 18(f)).
I would appreciate a response in electronic form within the statutory 20
working days.
Please contact me if any aspect needs clarification.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #34945 email]
Is [5][Christopher Luxon request email] the wrong address for Official Information
requests to Christopher Luxon? If so, please contact us using this form:
[6]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://fyi....
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[7]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://fyi....
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://aka.ms/o0ukef
2. mailto:[FOI #34945 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[FOI #34945 email]
5. mailto:[Christopher Luxon request email]
6. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/fyi.o...
7. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/fyi.o...
From: Joshua Riley
Thank you for your letter of 29 June and for consulting under section 18B. I'm happy to clarify, and to refine where it genuinely helps, and I think we can resolve this without engaging section 18(f). My responses are below.
Scope is already defined by correspondent
The request is confined to communications between the Prime Minister or his ministerial staff and a specific, finite set of correspondents — B416 and the named individuals. A search by those names over the period is a bounded exercise, and because B416 is a single-issue group, subject and correspondent largely coincide. I'm content for the search to be conducted by those names. I don't think a subject-matter limit is necessary to make the request manageable; but if it assists your review, you may treat as in scope any communication that concerns, refers to, or arises from B416's advocacy or the proposal to age-restrict social media for under-16s.
Emails and formal documents
I'm content for the bulk of the search to proceed as you propose — emails received or sent by the Prime Minister or his office, and formal advice, briefings, aides-mémoire, correspondence and other documents received by his office — searched by the names below. As you note, those are searchable, so this part shouldn't raise section 18(f).
Text messages, instant messages and call records — the key part for this office
I don't accept that these should fall away, and for the Office of the Prime Minister they are the most important part of the request. My request expressly covered communications held on personal devices or accounts that relate to official business, consistent with the Ombudsman's guidance that the medium does not determine whether something is official information. “Not centrally searchable” is not the same as “not held”: it means the records sit with individuals rather than in a central system. Records of exactly this kind — text messages between B416 and this office on this very topic — have already been released under the OIA and reported by the NZ Herald in November 2025, including messages between B416's Cecilia Robinson and the Prime Minister's Chief of Staff, and between Anna Mowbray and the Prime Minister. This office therefore plainly holds, and has previously produced, records of precisely this kind.
Rather than a central sweep, I'm content to narrow this element to a targeted search: please ask the Prime Minister and the members of his ministerial staff who dealt with this matter — including the Chief of Staff — to check their work and personal devices and accounts for text messages, instant messages and call records, within the period, with B416 or the named individuals. A search of a defined set of custodians for named correspondents is manageable and should not engage section 18(f).
Please answer for what this office holds — don't transfer it wholesale
As my request sets out, I have made separate requests to DPMC and three other holders, and asked each to answer for what it holds rather than consolidating. The ministerial correspondence, the text and message records described above, and the copy of the 17 April 2025 aide-mémoire provided to the Prime Minister are all held by this office and are for this office to answer. Please don't transfer them wholesale to DPMC or another agency. Section 14 should be used only for specific items genuinely more closely connected to another agency, with notice to me of what was transferred, to whom, and why, as I requested.
Clarification 1 — B416 and its representatives
The individuals I named are Cecilia Robinson, Anna Mowbray, Anna Curzon, Blair Knight and Malindi MacLean. By “any other director, officer, employee, member, representative or agent of B416” I mean any person communicating in that capacity — in practice, any communication from a b416.co.nz address, or sent or signed on B416's behalf. To assist your search, that plainly includes B416's chief executive, Nicole Green; please add her as a named search term, and treat any other person corresponding on B416's behalf as within scope.
Clarification 2 — the author and presenter of the 17 April 2025 aide-mémoire
I'm not in a position to name them; identifying who prepared and presented that advice is part of what the request seeks to establish. The document is sufficiently identified by its date (on or about 17 April 2025), its recipient (the Prime Minister) and its subject (restricting social media access for under-16s). As the aide-mémoire was provided to the Prime Minister, this office holds the copy that was provided to him; I ask that it be located — together with its drafts, attachments and related correspondence — and that its author and the person who presented it be identified.
Timeframe
This is clarification and refinement in response to your own section 18B consultation, so I ask that the original timeframe be treated as continuing to run rather than restarting. If you nonetheless treat the refined request as made today under section 15(1AA), please confirm that and tell me the new due date.
I'm happy to keep refining in writing if anything else would help.
From: Sarah Boyle
Kia ora Joshua,
Thank you for your email of 2 July 2026 refining your request under the
OIA. Please accept our apologies for the delay in acknowledging your
refinement.
We have interpreted your refined request as seeking:
Communications, including attachments such as briefings, held by this
office, for the period 1 January 2025 to 23 June 2026, where the
communications are between the Prime Minister or ministerial staff and
B416 or its representatives. This includes emails, text messages and other
electronic messages, meeting and call records, and an aide-mémoire dated
17 April 2025 relating to restricting social media access for under-16s.
Under section 15(1AA) of the Official Information Act, the timeframe for
responding to your request is calculated from the date the refinement was
received. Accordingly, the new due date for a decision on your request is
31 July 2026.
Yours sincerely
Sarah Boyle
show quoted sections
From: Joshua Riley
I'm writing with information to assist the search on my request. This is not an amendment or refinement of my request, and I don't ask that it be treated as one — it is information to help ensure the search captures what is already within the scope you set out on 17 July.
1. The group operates under more than one name
B416 is not the only name this group uses. As reported by the NZ Herald, the wider initiative operates under the name the Children's Online Safety Society, with B416 as a focused campaign within it. The registered entity is the Before16 Charitable Trust, registered in January 2025.
This matters practically. The aide-mémoire provided to the Prime Minister on 17 April 2025 was sent under the name Children's Online Safety Society, not B416 — as the published DPMC release shows (https://www.dpmc.govt.nz/sites/default/f...). A search confined to “B416” would not have found it. Since my request covers representatives and agents of B416, and B416 is a campaign of that society, correspondence under the society's name is correspondence from the same body and is already within scope.
I would be grateful if searches could include: “B416”, “Before 16”, “Before16”, “Before16 Charitable Trust” and “Children's Online Safety Society”; Cecilia Robinson, Anna Mowbray, Anna Curzon, Blair Knight, Malindi MacLean and Nicole Green; Dr Samantha Marsh and Dr Maneesh Deva; and Holly Brooker, in connection with “Makes Sense”.
2. Two matters this office is uniquely placed to answer
First, DPMC advised me on 20 July 2026 that a meeting took place on 6 May 2025 between staff in the Prime Minister's Office, including the Chief of Staff Cameron Burrows, and B416's chief executive Nicole Green, Anna Curzon and Cecilia Robinson, attended by a DPMC Policy Advisory Group advisor. DPMC states it holds no formal records of that meeting. My request covers meeting invitations, calendar entries, meeting notes and file notes, and your restatement of 17 July confirms meeting and call records are within scope. As the meeting involved this office's own staff, I ask that the search include any calendar entry or invitation, any notes taken, and any correspondence arranging or following up that meeting.
Second, the published DPMC release shows that the 17 April 2025 aide-mémoire was sent by Cecilia Robinson direct to the Prime Minister's parliamentary address, and forwarded from this office to DPMC officials on 18 April. My request asks this office to identify the author and the presenter of that aide-mémoire; as the original was received here, this office is best placed to confirm that, together with any drafts, attachments and related correspondence.
I appreciate your assistance, and I'm happy to clarify anything further in writing.
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).
