Evidentiary Basis for the 2017 Fluoride UL Update
Alisha Riley made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Alisha Riley to read a recent response and update the status.
From: Alisha Riley
Dear Ministry of Health,
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request the specific evidentiary and toxicological foundation used to justify the 2017 update to the Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs), specifically the decision to increase the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of fluoride for children aged 0–8 to 0.20 mg/kg bw/day.
Please provide the following official information:
1. Skeletal Retention & Demographic Modeling:
Please provide all internal risk assessments, toxicological modeling, or equity evaluations conducted prior to the 2017 UL increase that analysed chronic bioaccumulation risks for exclusively formula-fed infants. Please specify if these assessments explicitly accounted for the disproportionate cumulative exposure on ethnic cohorts with statistically higher formula-feeding rates (specifically Māori and Pacific infants).
2. The Under-8 Evidentiary Baseline:
Given that the 2009 New Zealand Oral Health Survey excluded children under 8 from fluorosis diagnostic reporting, please provide the specific contemporary domestic clinical datasets or epidemiological studies relied upon in 2017 to conclude that doubling the UL would not inflict severe structural harm (hypomineralization) on this unmonitored demographic.
3. Safety Benchmarks and Margins:
Please provide the internal policy documents or scientific guidelines justifying the use of "severe dental fluorosis" as the primary or sole biological benchmark for defining the UL, including documentation explaining why standard toxicological safety margins (e.g., 10x or 100x below the LOAEL) were not applied to the 2017 update.
4. Internal Communications:
Please provide all internal memoranda, meeting minutes, and communications between policy/science teams, the NHMRC, and Crown Law between January 2016 and December 2017 referencing the fluoride UL/NRV update. I specifically request any communications within this timeframe that concurrently reference the pending New Health New Zealand Inc v South Taranaki District Council litigation.
Thank you for your time.
Alisha Riley
From: OIA Requests
Kia ora Alisha,
Thank you for your request under the Official Information Act 1982 (the
Act), received by the Ministry of Health - Manatû Hauora on 25 March 2026.
You requested:
“The specific evidentiary and toxicological foundation used to justify the
2017 update to the Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs), specifically the
decision to increase the Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) of fluoride for
children aged 0–8 to 0.20 mg/kg bw/day.
Please provide the following official information:
1. Skeletal Retention & Demographic Modeling:
Please provide all internal risk assessments, toxicological modeling, or
equity evaluations conducted prior to the 2017 UL increase that analysed
chronic bioaccumulation risks for exclusively formula-fed infants. Please
specify if these assessments explicitly accounted for the disproportionate
cumulative exposure on ethnic cohorts with statistically higher
formula-feeding rates (specifically Mâori and Pacific infants).
2. The Under-8 Evidentiary Baseline:
Given that the 2009 New Zealand Oral Health Survey excluded children under
8 from fluorosis diagnostic reporting, please provide the specific
contemporary domestic clinical datasets or epidemiological studies relied
upon in 2017 to conclude that doubling the UL would not inflict severe
structural harm (hypomineralization) on this unmonitored demographic.
3. Safety Benchmarks and Margins:
Please provide the internal policy documents or scientific guidelines
justifying the use of "severe dental fluorosis" as the primary or sole
biological benchmark for defining the UL, including documentation
explaining why standard toxicological safety margins (e.g., 10x or 100x
below the LOAEL) were not applied to the 2017 update.
4. Internal Communications:
Please provide all internal memoranda, meeting minutes, and communications
between policy/science teams, the NHMRC, and Crown Law between January
2016 and December 2017 referencing the fluoride UL/NRV update. I
specifically request any communications within this timeframe that
concurrently reference the pending New Health New Zealand Inc v South
Taranaki District Council litigation.”
The reference number for your request is H2026080565. We will endeavour to
respond to your request as soon as possible and in any event no later than
24 April 2026 being 20 working days after the day your request was
received. If we are unable to respond to your request by then, we will
notify you of an extension of that timeframe.
If you have any queries regarding your request, please feel free to
contact the OIA Services Team on [1][email address]. If any
additional factors come to light which are relevant to your request,
please do not hesitate to contact us so that these can be taken into
account.
Under section 28(3) of the Act you have the right to ask the Ombudsman to
review any decisions made under this request. The Ombudsman may be
contacted by email at: [2][email address] or by calling 0800
802 602.
Ngâ mihi,
OIA Services Team
Ministry of Health | Manatû Hauora
M[3]inistry of Health information releases
show quoted sections
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
mailto:[email address]
2. mailto:[email address]
mailto:[email address]
3. https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
https://www.health.govt.nz/about-ministr...
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).
