Veterans’ Affairs contracted health-service administration, procurement, oversight, and performance
SPENCER JONES made this Official Information request to New Zealand Defence Force
Currently waiting for a response from New Zealand Defence Force, they must respond promptly and normally no later than (details and exceptions).
From: SPENCER JONES
Dear Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand / New Zealand Defence Force,
Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request the following information concerning contracted, outsourced, or third-party administered health-related services for veterans, including but not limited to the administration of GP consultation reimbursements, pharmacy reimbursements, annual medical assessment processes, home independence services, treatment-card related claiming, and any associated provider-facing platforms or payment systems, for the period 1 January 2020 to the date of your response.
Please provide:
1. A list of all contracts, service agreements, memoranda of understanding, panel arrangements, procurement awards, or other formal arrangements under which external providers or entities have delivered, administered, reimbursed, processed, triaged, audited, or supported health-related services for Veterans’ Affairs clients.
For each arrangement, please include:
a. provider name
b. service description
c. commencement date and end date
d. procurement method used
e. total contract value or estimated value
f. responsible business unit
g. whether the arrangement replaced a previous provider or system.
2. Copies of the executed contracts, service specifications, schedules, statements of work, service descriptions, and KPI/performance schedules for:
a. Green Cross
b. ProCare
c. any other provider used for GP, pharmacy, treatment, rehabilitation, annual medical assessments, or reimbursement administration.
3. All procurement documents relating to the decision to change the provider for GP and prescription reimbursement administration from Green Cross to ProCare, including:
a. procurement plan
b. market analysis or market research
c. request for proposal or equivalent sourcing documents
d. evaluation criteria
e. moderation or scoring records
f. recommendation reports
g. approval papers
h. conflict of interest declarations
i. transition planning documents.
4. All performance monitoring material for each relevant provider from 2020 onward, including:
a. monthly, quarterly, or annual KPI reports
b. dashboards
c. audit reports
d. service reviews
e. contract management reports
f. performance breach notices
g. corrective action requests
h. correspondence concerning under-performance
i. meeting minutes where provider performance was discussed.
5. All documents that identify who within Veterans’ Affairs or NZDF is responsible for end-to-end oversight of these contracted or outsourced health-service arrangements after contract award, including:
a. governance structures
b. delegations
c. role descriptions
d. contract management frameworks
e. internal guidance
f. risk ownership documents.
6. Any internal reviews, lessons-learned reports, issue logs, briefings, or advice since 2020 relating to:
a. delays in provider payments or reimbursements
b. veterans being unable to access treatment because of provider claiming issues
c. transition risks when changing providers or systems
d. provider non-compliance with contractual requirements
e. data quality or reconciliation problems
f. rural access issues
g. complaints from veterans, GPs, pharmacies, or advocacy organisations about contracted health-service administration.
7. Any documents analysing whether current contracting or reimbursement arrangements align with commercial practice, value for money, veteran access needs, or administrative efficiency.
8. Statistics, by year where held, on:
a. number of claims or reimbursements processed through each provider
b. average processing times
c. declined, returned, queried, or unpaid claims
d. complaints received relating to provider-administered health reimbursements
e. number of providers enrolled in each system
f. any service disruption incidents.
9. Any internal audit, external audit, assurance review, or monitoring report since 2020 that assesses the effectiveness, efficiency, lawfulness, or data integrity of contracted or outsourced veterans’ health-service administration.
10. Copies of any briefings to the Minister for Veterans, Chief of Defence Force, Head of Veterans’ Affairs, or senior leadership relating to:
a. contracted health-service delivery
b. provider changes
c. service backlogs
d. oversight weaknesses
e. risks to veterans’ access to care.
If any part of this request is likely to be refused under section 18(f), please consider whether it can be refined or provided in stages under section 13, including by supplying a document schedule first.
Please provide the information electronically where possible.
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).


SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Public Annotation – Veterans’ Affairs Contracted Health Services Oversight (NZ)
This request seeks information about how Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand manages and oversees outsourced or third-party administration of veterans’ health services, including the recent transition from Green Cross to ProCare for GP consultation and prescription reimbursement processing.
International experience shows that outsourced veteran healthcare administration can create accountability gaps if contract performance and oversight are not closely monitored. For example, a recent audit by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Inspector General examined Community-Based Outpatient Clinic contracts and found that national oversight weakened after contract award, while contractors missed performance metrics frequently yet continued to receive full payment. That audit recommended stronger life-cycle oversight, improved monitoring of performance metrics, and clearer accountability mechanisms.
New Zealand veterans rely on external providers and reimbursement systems to access healthcare for accepted service-related conditions. Public reporting indicates that Veterans’ Affairs supports tens of thousands of clients each year and spends over $100 million annually on entitlements and support services. Recent procurement changes (including the move to ProCare from April 2026) raise reasonable public interest questions about how those arrangements are governed, monitored, and evaluated.
This OIA therefore asks for procurement documents, contracts, performance metrics, audit reports, oversight structures, and complaint data relating to outsourced administration of veteran healthcare services. The aim is to understand whether governance systems are sufficiently robust to ensure veterans receive timely care and that public funds are being administered effectively.
Given the growing number of veterans accessing support services and the complexity of cross-agency healthcare delivery in New Zealand, transparency around contract management, performance monitoring, and service continuity is clearly in the public interest.
Link to this