Operational Guidance and Search Clarification (Veterans’ Affairs)
SPENCER JONES made this Official Information request to New Zealand Defence Force
Currently waiting for a response from New Zealand Defence Force, they must respond promptly and normally no later than (details and exceptions).
From: SPENCER JONES
Dear New Zealand Defence Force,
Subject: Follow-Up Request – Operational Guidance and Search Clarification (Veterans Affairs).
Tēnā koutou,
I refer to OIA-2026-5662, which was refused under section 18(e) on the basis that no relevant information exists.
To assist clarity and ensure the scope is precise and manageable, I now request the following information only:
⸻
1️⃣ Operational Guidance and Role Definition Documents
Please provide copies of any documents currently held (or held at any time since 1 January 2019) that:
a) Describe, define, or explain the boundaries of Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand’s role in relation to referral or signposting to non-statutory support (including charities, community organisations, or mainstream services);
b) Provide internal guidance to staff regarding how to respond when veterans seek assistance outside statutory entitlements;
c) Describe how staff are instructed to handle enquiries that fall outside eligibility under the Veterans’ Support Act 2014.
This request is confined to operational guidance, manuals, aide-memoires, workflow documents, internal policy notes, or equivalent material. It does not seek the creation of new analysis.
⸻
2️⃣ Records of Engagement with the Veterans’ Advisory Board
Please provide copies of any documents (including emails, briefings, meeting papers, or file notes) since 1 January 2019 that:
a) Record discussions between Veterans’ Affairs and the Veterans’ Advisory Board concerning referral pathways, navigation support, or interaction with non-statutory services;
b) Define or clarify respective roles between VANZ and the Veterans’ Advisory Board regarding veteran support beyond statutory entitlements.
If such material exists only within meeting minutes or briefing packs, provision of the relevant extracts is sufficient.
⸻
3️⃣ Search Description (Search Adequacy Confirmation)
If any part of this request is refused under section 18(e), please provide:
a) A description of the systems searched (e.g., document management systems, email archives, shared drives);
b) The search terms used;
c) The roles or business units consulted.
This is requested to ensure transparency regarding the reasonableness of the search undertaken.
⸻
This request is deliberately confined to documents that either:
• Define operational boundaries; or
• Record actual engagement with governance bodies.
It does not seek expansion of mandate or policy reform material.
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
Yours faithfully,
SPENCER JONES
From: Ministerial Services
New Zealand Defence Force
Good morning Spencer Jones
Your request below has been received and a decision on your request will be provided as soon as possible and no later than 27 March 2026. Responses to requests for information that are considered to be in the wider public interest will be published on the New Zealand Defence Force website (www.nzdf.mil.nz).
Regards
Corporate and Ministerial Services
Office of the Chief of Defence Force
New Zealand Defence Force | Te Ope Kātua o Aotearoa
www.nzdf.mil.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: SPENCER JONES <[FOI #33887 email]>
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2026 10:14 pm
To: Ministerial Services <[NZDF request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Operational Guidance and Search Clarification (Veterans’ Affairs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in any doubt, please forward the email to [email address] and then delete the email from your Inbox. Thank you
Dear New Zealand Defence Force,
Subject: Follow-Up Request – Operational Guidance and Search Clarification (Veterans Affairs).
Tēnā koutou,
I refer to OIA-2026-5662, which was refused under section 18(e) on the basis that no relevant information exists.
To assist clarity and ensure the scope is precise and manageable, I now request the following information only:
⸻
1️⃣ Operational Guidance and Role Definition Documents
Please provide copies of any documents currently held (or held at any time since 1 January 2019) that:
a) Describe, define, or explain the boundaries of Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand’s role in relation to referral or signposting to non-statutory support (including charities, community organisations, or mainstream services);
b) Provide internal guidance to staff regarding how to respond when veterans seek assistance outside statutory entitlements;
c) Describe how staff are instructed to handle enquiries that fall outside eligibility under the Veterans’ Support Act 2014.
This request is confined to operational guidance, manuals, aide-memoires, workflow documents, internal policy notes, or equivalent material. It does not seek the creation of new analysis.
⸻
2️⃣ Records of Engagement with the Veterans’ Advisory Board
Please provide copies of any documents (including emails, briefings, meeting papers, or file notes) since 1 January 2019 that:
a) Record discussions between Veterans’ Affairs and the Veterans’ Advisory Board concerning referral pathways, navigation support, or interaction with non-statutory services;
b) Define or clarify respective roles between VANZ and the Veterans’ Advisory Board regarding veteran support beyond statutory entitlements.
If such material exists only within meeting minutes or briefing packs, provision of the relevant extracts is sufficient.
⸻
3️⃣ Search Description (Search Adequacy Confirmation)
If any part of this request is refused under section 18(e), please provide:
a) A description of the systems searched (e.g., document management systems, email archives, shared drives);
b) The search terms used;
c) The roles or business units consulted.
This is requested to ensure transparency regarding the reasonableness of the search undertaken.
⸻
This request is deliberately confined to documents that either:
•Define operational boundaries; or
•Record actual engagement with governance bodies.
It does not seek expansion of mandate or policy reform material.
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
Yours faithfully,
SPENCER JONES
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #33887 email]
Is [NZDF request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to New Zealand Defence Force? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.
If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
hide quoted sections
From: Ministerial Services
New Zealand Defence Force
Good morning Spencer Jones
Your request below has been received and a decision on your request will be provided as soon as possible and no later than 27 March 2026. Responses to requests for information that are considered to be in the wider public interest will be published on the New Zealand Defence Force website (www.nzdf.mil.nz).
Regards
Corporate and Ministerial Services
Office of the Chief of Defence Force
New Zealand Defence Force | Te Ope Kātua o Aotearoa www.nzdf.mil.nz
-----Original Message-----
From: SPENCER JONES <[FOI #33887 email]>
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2026 10:14 pm
To: Ministerial Services <[NZDF request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Operational Guidance and Search Clarification (Veterans’ Affairs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Do not follow guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If in any doubt, please forward the email to [email address] and then delete the email from your Inbox. Thank you
Dear New Zealand Defence Force,
Subject: Follow-Up Request – Operational Guidance and Search Clarification (Veterans Affairs).
Tēnā koutou,
I refer to OIA-2026-5662, which was refused under section 18(e) on the basis that no relevant information exists.
To assist clarity and ensure the scope is precise and manageable, I now request the following information only:
⸻
1️⃣ Operational Guidance and Role Definition Documents
Please provide copies of any documents currently held (or held at any time since 1 January 2019) that:
a) Describe, define, or explain the boundaries of Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand’s role in relation to referral or signposting to non-statutory support (including charities, community organisations, or mainstream services);
b) Provide internal guidance to staff regarding how to respond when veterans seek assistance outside statutory entitlements;
c) Describe how staff are instructed to handle enquiries that fall outside eligibility under the Veterans’ Support Act 2014.
This request is confined to operational guidance, manuals, aide-memoires, workflow documents, internal policy notes, or equivalent material. It does not seek the creation of new analysis.
⸻
2️⃣ Records of Engagement with the Veterans’ Advisory Board
Please provide copies of any documents (including emails, briefings, meeting papers, or file notes) since 1 January 2019 that:
a) Record discussions between Veterans’ Affairs and the Veterans’ Advisory Board concerning referral pathways, navigation support, or interaction with non-statutory services;
b) Define or clarify respective roles between VANZ and the Veterans’ Advisory Board regarding veteran support beyond statutory entitlements.
If such material exists only within meeting minutes or briefing packs, provision of the relevant extracts is sufficient.
⸻
3️⃣ Search Description (Search Adequacy Confirmation)
If any part of this request is refused under section 18(e), please provide:
a) A description of the systems searched (e.g., document management systems, email archives, shared drives);
b) The search terms used;
c) The roles or business units consulted.
This is requested to ensure transparency regarding the reasonableness of the search undertaken.
⸻
This request is deliberately confined to documents that either:
•Define operational boundaries; or
•Record actual engagement with governance bodies.
It does not seek expansion of mandate or policy reform material.
Kind regards,
Spencer Jones
Yours faithfully,
SPENCER JONES
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #33887 email]
Is [NZDF request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to New Zealand Defence Force? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this Internet Email message is intended
for the addressee only and may contain privileged information, but not
necessarily the official views or opinions of the New Zealand Defence Force.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or
distribute this message or the information in it.
If you have received this message in error, please Email or telephone
the sender immediately.
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
Public Annotation – Follow-Up Request Focused on Operational Guidance and Search Adequacy
Following the refusal of OIA-2026-5662 under section 18(e) (“information does not exist”), I have submitted a narrower and more precisely framed follow-up request.
The original request sought records discussing responsibility for veteran navigation outside statutory entitlements. The response asserted that, because Veterans’ Affairs New Zealand (VANZ) has no authority to expand beyond the Veterans’ Support Act 2014, no relevant information exists.
Rather than re-arguing the scope of statutory authority, the follow-up request focuses on two objective and verifiable categories of records:
1. Operational Guidance and Role Definition Documents
This includes any internal manuals, workflow documents, staff guidance, aide-memoires, or policy notes that describe:
• The boundaries of VANZ’s referral role;
• How staff are instructed to respond when veterans seek assistance outside statutory entitlements; and
• How enquiries falling outside eligibility are handled in practice.
These are operational governance documents, not policy reform proposals.
2. Records of Engagement with the Veterans’ Advisory Board (VAB)
The request seeks any existing communications, meeting papers, minutes, or briefings that:
• Record discussions about referral pathways or navigation support; or
• Clarify respective roles between VANZ and the VAB in relation to non-statutory support.
This reframing does not expand the scope of the inquiry. It narrows it to document classes that should reasonably exist within any functioning public agency, regardless of whether its statutory mandate is limited.
Importantly, the request also asks that, if section 18(e) is relied upon again, a description of the search undertaken be provided (including systems searched and business units consulted). This ensures transparency about the adequacy of the search process.
The purpose of this follow-up is not adversarial. It is to determine, in a structured and proportionate way:
• Whether operational boundaries are documented;
• Whether referral practice is formally guided;
• Whether engagement with the Veterans’ Advisory Board has been recorded; and
• Whether the earlier refusal reflects genuine absence of records or an overly narrow interpretation of the request.
This clarification keeps the matter focused on governance documentation and search transparency, rather than on questions of legislative reform.
I will await the response within the statutory timeframe.
Link to this