Dear Crown Infrastructure Partners,

Under the Official Information Act 1982, I request:

1. Any analysis, business cases, or advice regarding CIP's potential role in supporting community-owned, locally operated, or smaller-scale telecommunications infrastructure providers in rural areas, including whether such support has been considered, proposed, or declined.

2. Any assessment of capital access barriers facing rural telecommunications infrastructure operators, including analysis of whether:
- Commercial banks adequately serve infrastructure financing needs in rural telecommunications
- Specialised or illiquid assets (such as telecommunications towers, point-to-point links, or rural network equipment) create financing barriers that prevent otherwise viable operators from accessing growth capital
- Crown infrastructure financing could address market failures where commercial lenders decline to finance rural telecommunications due to asset liquidity concerns rather than business viability concerns

3. Any advice to Ministers or shareholding Ministers regarding CIP's strategic direction for rural connectivity infrastructure, specifically:
- Whether CIP's mandate includes supporting non-incumbent, community-based, or regionally focused connectivity providers
- Whether government strategy assumes satellite services adequately address rural connectivity needs, rendering terrestrial infrastructure investment unnecessary
- What role, if any, CIP envisions for supporting locally operated alternatives to satellite or incumbent-operated services

4. Any assessment of competitive dynamics where well-capitalised providers (including satellite operators with substantial backing) compete against capital-constrained local operators who cannot access equivalent financing despite potentially offering superior local service, resilience benefits, or community economic outcomes.

5. Any analysis of whether Crown investment or financing support for community telecommunications infrastructure would align with:
- Regional economic development objectives
- Infrastructure resilience and redundancy goals
- Retention of technical capability and employment in regions
- Competition and consumer choice objectives

6. Any advice on mechanisms through which community infrastructure providers could access Crown financing, co-investment, or credit enhancement, or alternatively, documented reasons why such mechanisms are not considered appropriate or necessary.

Context: There appears to be a structural financing gap where rural telecommunications infrastructure providers cannot access commercial capital due to asset illiquidity concerns, while government has reduced/removed direct infrastructure funding. I am seeking to understand whether Crown entities have assessed this gap and what strategy, if any, exists to support community infrastructure providers in rural connectivity markets.

Yours faithfully,

Sam Brown