We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Marie please sign in and let everyone know.

Investigations and prosecutions under Maritime Transport Act 1994

Marie made this Official Information request to Canterbury Regional Council

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Marie to read a recent response and update the status.

From: Marie

Dear Canterbury Regional Council,

Could you please provide the following:

1. Could you please advise of any investigations and prosecutions by your council under the Maritime Transport Act 1994 in the last 10 years (or timeframe that doesn’t invoke the too must work refusal clause).

2. Your internal procedures/manuals and other documents in relation to whether you investigate and prosecute or Maritime New Zealand does.

3. What is your understanding (any agreements or memorandum of understanding with Maritime New Zealand) on decisions and how those decisions are made as to whether you or Maritime NZ investigate recreational boating incidents.

4. Please provide your standard operating procedures for investigating and prosecuting under the Maritime Transport Act 1994 (or general if not specific).

5. Please provide the criteria used to determine if you investigate an recreation boating incident.

6. Please provide the code of conduct and conflict of interest policy in relation to your investigators. For example, if a victim and complainant in a recreational boat incident is a friend of one of your investigators or officers, and then they called your officer on a weekend, then went your officers house to complain about the incident and told your officer how angry they were about the other people on board, and their treatment etc…(when police and harbour master were already aware of the incident and choose not to act) would your officer then be able to recommend and lead an investigation into the accident including making recommendations to prosecute the people the officers friend was angry at? (This situation did not involve your council, or other councils, but was a situation with an officer from a govt department investigating an incident under the circumstances described). I am not trying to get an opinion, rather demonstrate the angle I am taking regards policies and documents that relate to this and would either allow or disallow that example to happen in your organisation.

Yours faithfully,

Marie

Link to this

From: LGOIMA
Canterbury Regional Council

Kia ora Marie

Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (LGOIMA): Request for information

I refer to your email dated 11/06/2024.

As you might be aware, LGOIMA applies to all requests for information that we receive. We are able to respond immediately to some requests, but in instances where we need to collate information we do so and respond in accordance with our specified process.

Under LGOIMA, Environment Canterbury has 20 working days to respond to your request. Your request has been passed to the person(s) responsible for responding and you will be contacted as soon as possible but no later than 10/07/2024.

Please be advised that we put LGOIMA responses that are in the public interest onto our website. No personal details of the requester are given, but we do summarise the essence of the request alongside the response.

Your LGOIMA reference number is 2809C.

Ngâ mihi
Environment Canterbury

-----Original Message-----
From: Marie <[FOI #27224 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 3:11 PM
To: LGOIMA <[ECAN request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Investigations and prosecutions under Maritime Transport Act 1994

[You don't often get email from [FOI #27224 email]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]

Caution: This is an email from an external party. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments.

Dear Canterbury Regional Council,

Could you please provide the following:

1. Could you please advise of any investigations and prosecutions by your council under the Maritime Transport Act 1994 in the last 10 years (or timeframe that doesn’t invoke the too must work refusal clause).

2. Your internal procedures/manuals and other documents in relation to whether you investigate and prosecute or Maritime New Zealand does.

3. What is your understanding (any agreements or memorandum of understanding with Maritime New Zealand) on decisions and how those decisions are made as to whether you or Maritime NZ investigate recreational boating incidents.

4. Please provide your standard operating procedures for investigating and prosecuting under the Maritime Transport Act 1994 (or general if not specific).

5. Please provide the criteria used to determine if you investigate an recreation boating incident.

6. Please provide the code of conduct and conflict of interest policy in relation to your investigators. For example, if a victim and complainant in a recreational boat incident is a friend of one of your investigators or officers, and then they called your officer on a weekend, then went your officers house to complain about the incident and told your officer how angry they were about the other people on board, and their treatment etc…(when police and harbour master were already aware of the incident and choose not to act) would your officer then be able to recommend and lead an investigation into the accident including making recommendations to prosecute the people the officers friend was angry at? (This situation did not involve your council, or other councils, but was a situation with an officer from a govt department investigating an incident under the circumstances described). I am not trying to get an opinion, rather demonstrate the angle I am taking regards policies and documents that relate to this and would either allow or disallow that example to happen in your organisation.

Yours faithfully,

Marie

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #27224 email]

Is [ECAN request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Canterbury Regional Council? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

LGOIMA

Environment Canterbury
[Environment Canterbury] <https://www.ecan.govt.nz/?utm_source=ema...>
<tel:>
<tel:>
[ECAN request email]<mailto:[ECAN request email]> PO Box 345, Christchurch 8140
Customer Services: 0800 324 636<tel:0800324636>
24 Hours: 0800 76 55 88<tel:0800765588>
ecan.govt.nz<https://www.ecan.govt.nz/?utm_source=ema...>

[Facebook]<https://www.facebook.com/EnvironmentCant...> [Twitter] <https://twitter.com/ECan> [YouTube] <https://www.youtube.com/user/ECanGovt> [Instagram] <https://www.instagram.com/environment_ca...>

hide quoted sections

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Marie please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Canterbury Regional Council only: