Scaling up of radiofrequency radiation emissions - is the science, the monitoring & the research rigorous & at arms-length from industry interests?
J Bruning made this Official Information request to Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
The request was successful.
      From: J Bruning
      
    
    Dear Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment,
This is not to be forwarded to the Ministry of Health. This is a request specifically directed to MBIE who administers the Resource Management (National Environmental Standards for Telecommunication Facilities) Regulations 2016 (NESTF Regulations) as well as the Radiocommunications Regulations 2001, Radiocommunications Act 1989 and the Telecommunications Act 2001.
Installations of base stations and small cell devices have accelerated. As a consequence, population level radiofrequency radiation exposures, thermal and non-thermal from multiple sources have scaled up. Yet there is very little information publicly demonstrating that MBIE, as the responsible agency and the agency that controls the science and research budget, is taking steps to understand and evaluate the altered risk environment.
[1] MBIE is the responsible agency for establishing and maintaining maximum exposure limits for the public. NESTF 2016 Users Guide states ‘The standard sets maximum exposure limits for the public that are around 50 times lower than the recognised threshold for established effects.’
(i) Please transparently disclose these maximum exposure limits (which I presume is detailed in NZS 2772.1:1999) for the public (do not refer me to a paywalled PDF document). This includes residential exposure limit standards for acute and chronic exposure limits.
(ii) Please state what the ‘recognised threshold for established effects’ is and supply complete citations for the scientific studies used to establish the threshold level.
(iii) Please advise names of all New Zealand-based expert public-sector scientists/technical experts who have supplied expert information or reports discussing the safety of these standards (NZS 2772.1: 1999), during the period January 2020 and December 2023.
[2] (a) Please advise which funding schemes have been established; and which public-sector funding pots have been established by MBIE, to enable the following activities to be undertaken by publicly-funded, non-industry researchers:
(i) Long-term or spot assessments to monitor and record levels of microwave radiation in New Zealand urban environments in order to assess effects from increasing proliferation of cellular communications systems.
(ii) Methodological reviews of the scientific literature to assess the evidence on health risk from non-thermal radiofrequency fields exposures based on proximity to base stations or small cell devices.
(iii) Assessments of chronic (long-term) risk to vulnerable populations: including infants, children; and people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity and microwave syndrome.
(iv) Cost-benefit analyses of cost, speed, reliability and energy efficiency of 5G communications in comparison to existing broadband and wired solutions.
(b) Please supply research received by MBIE discussing issues (i) - (iv).
[3] (a) Please advise what funding has been set aside for MBIE as regulator with oversight to investigate citizen complaints of health deterioration following the installation of base stations, small-cell devices or 5G or wireless ‘smart’ meters in proximity to their residence. (b) Please advise the name of the database established to record complaints.
[4] Please supply all memos/reports/emails reviewing global levels and best practice RFR standards regarding maximum exposure limits for the public.
[5] Please supply memos/reports/emails discussing the potential lowering of New Zealand RFR standards.
(Note: The paper Ministry of Health. 2022. Interagency Committee on the Health Effects of Non-ionising Fields: Report to Ministers 2022, does not attempt to review the scientific literature but rather, serves as a discussion paper which only vaguely covers the content above and cites often quite old, or narrow in scope research. As such, it is not sufficiently rigorous for regulatory purposes.)
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
J Bruning
        From: Ministerial Services
        Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
      
    
    Ref: DOIA 2324-1443
 
Kia ora J Bruning,
 
On behalf of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment I
 acknowledge your email of 9 January 2024 requesting under the Official
 Information Act 1982 (the Act), the following:
 
‘Dear Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, This is not to be
 forwarded to the Ministry of Health. This is a request specifically
 directed to MBIE who administers the Resource Management (National
 Environmental Standards for Telecommunication Facilities) Regulations 2016
 (NESTF Regulations) as well as the Radiocommunications Regulations 2001,
 Radiocommunications Act 1989 and the Telecommunications Act 2001.
 Installations of base stations and small cell devices have accelerated. As
 a consequence, population level radiofrequency radiation exposures,
 thermal and non-thermal from multiple sources have scaled up. Yet there is
 very little information publicly demonstrating that MBIE, as the
 responsible agency and the agency that controls the science and research
 budget, is taking steps to understand and evaluate the altered risk
 environment. _openBraceIdentifier_1_closeBraceIdentifier_ MBIE is the
 responsible agency for establishing and maintaining maximum exposure
 limits for the public. NESTF 2016 Users Guide states ‘The standard sets
 maximum exposure limits for the public that are around 50 times lower than
 the recognised threshold for established effects.’ (i) Please
 transparently disclose these maximum exposure limits (which I presume is
 detailed in NZS 2772.1:1999) for the public (do not refer me to a
 paywalled PDF document). This includes residential exposure limit
 standards for acute and chronic exposure limits. (ii) Please state what
 the ‘recognised threshold for established effects’ is and supply complete
 citations for the scientific studies used to establish the threshold
 level. (iii) Please advise names of all New Zealand-based expert
 public-sector scientists/technical experts who have supplied expert
 information or reports discussing the safety of these standards (NZS
 2772.1: 1999), during the period January 2020 and December 2023.
 _openBraceIdentifier_2_closeBraceIdentifier_ (a) Please advise which
 funding schemes have been established; and which public-sector funding
 pots have been established by MBIE, to enable the following activities to
 be undertaken by publicly-funded, non-industry researchers: (i) Long-term
 or spot assessments to monitor and record levels of microwave radiation in
 New Zealand urban environments in order to assess effects from increasing
 proliferation of cellular communications systems. (ii) Methodological
 reviews of the scientific literature to assess the evidence on health risk
 from non-thermal radiofrequency fields exposures based on proximity to
 base stations or small cell devices. (iii) Assessments of chronic
 (long-term) risk to vulnerable populations: including infants, children;
 and people with electromagnetic hypersensitivity and microwave syndrome.
 (iv) Cost-benefit analyses of cost, speed, reliability and energy
 efficiency of 5G communications in comparison to existing broadband and
 wired solutions. (b) Please supply research received by MBIE discussing
 issues (i) - (iv). _openBraceIdentifier_3_closeBraceIdentifier_ (a) Please
 advise what funding has been set aside for MBIE as regulator with
 oversight to investigate citizen complaints of health deterioration
 following the installation of base stations, small-cell devices or 5G or
 wireless ‘smart’ meters in proximity to their residence. (b) Please advise
 the name of the database established to record complaints.
 _openBraceIdentifier_4_closeBraceIdentifier_ Please supply all
 memos/reports/emails reviewing global levels and best practice RFR
 standards regarding maximum exposure limits for the public.
 _openBraceIdentifier_5_closeBraceIdentifier_ Please supply
 memos/reports/emails discussing the potential lowering of New Zealand RFR
 standards. (Note: The paper Ministry of Health. 2022. Interagency
 Committee on the Health Effects of Non-ionising Fields: Report to
 Ministers 2022, does not attempt to review the scientific literature but
 rather, serves as a discussion paper which only vaguely covers the content
 above and cites often quite old, or narrow in scope research. As such, it
 is not sufficiently rigorous for regulatory purposes.)
 
Please note that the days from 25 December 2023 to 15 January 2024
 (inclusive) are defined as non- working days in the Act and are not
 counted in the calculation for the response due date. This may affect the
 time period for responding to your request.
 
We will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible, and no
 later than 13 February 2024, being 20 working days after the day your
 request was received. If we are unable to respond to your request by then,
 we will notify you of an extension of that timeframe.  If you have any
 enquiries regarding your request feel free to contact us via email to
 [1][MBIE request email].
 
 
Nâku noa, nâ
Ministerial Services
 
Corporate Services, Finance & Enablement
Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
15 Stout Street, Wellington 6011 |  PO Box 1473 Wellington 6140
 
 
References
Visible links
 1. mailto:[MBIE request email]
        From: *OIA
        Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment
      
    
    Ref: 2324-1443
Dear J Bruning
Please see attached documents in response to your Information Request of 9
 January 2024.
If you have any queries regarding your request, feel free to email us at
 [1][email address]
 
 
Ngâ mihi nui
 
MINISTERIAL SERVICES
Building Resources and Markets
25 The Terrace – Pastoral House, Wellington Central, Wellington 6011
 
References
Visible links
 1. mailto:[email address]
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
 - Download a zip file of all correspondence (note: this contains the same information already available above).
 

