We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Chris McCashin please sign in and let everyone know.

Risks Outweigh Benefits to Children

Chris McCashin made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Chris McCashin to read recent responses and update the status.

From: Chris McCashin

Dear Ministry of Health, Ashley Bloomfield, Chris Hipkins, Jacinder Ardern,

There is now irrefutable evidence that the vaccine risks outweigh the benefits in young fit people especially children where there is a thousand-fold increase in adverse reactions to the injections in 2021 compared to the last decade from ALL other vaccinations.

Already in New Zealand there are over 1,500 adverse reactions some very serious and permanent in children when the risk to a healthy child who gets Covid-19 and has to go to hospital is 44 per 1,000,000 a % of 0.0044%. The following links provide testimony by experts to the Food and Drug Administration who overwhelmingly voted 16-2 against booster shot programmes with it even being discussed that the vaccines are killing more people than they are helping and also driving the Covid mutations such as Delta. The two links are to testimony in front of the FDA outlining the risks/issues. Please confirm why is this evidence being ignored by the Ministry of Health.
https://share.icloud.com/photos/0WH-F12h...

Can the Ministry of Health please provide the following urgently
All advice papers( including assessment of compliance with the NZ Bill of Rights Act) to the Minister on the Covid Public Health Response Vaccination Order ( this is still outstanding despite repeated requests) and the Cabinet advice and decision to approve the use of the Pfizervax for children 12 and older despite the insignificant risk of Covid for children and the many outstanding concerns about its short and long term safety, efficacy, integrity and effectiveness against the Delta and other strains

Provide all of the board/persons involved in who approved this vaccine for 12-15 year olds

Ashley Bloomfield has stated he requires a 90% vaccination rate. Given the number of adverse reactions to date across all age groups 45,331 I would estimate there will be 200,000 plus reactions and already 40 deaths in New Zealand. Can the Ministry of Health provide the Cost/Benefit analysis of this vaccine when virus deaths are so low in New Zealand.

Can you also provide the number of doctors that have been censured for highlighting these risks which can now not be ignored and provide formal apologies to these doctors

The following article also outlines that Covid-19 in India an area densely populated with 265,000,000 people is mostly free from Covid with the usage of Ivermectin. Can you provide the number of doctors who have attempted to sponsor Ivermectin products and if the Ministry of Health has dismissed these and for what reasons?

Please note the USA is also prescribing Ivermectin for Afghan refugees who arrive in the country. What justification does Ashley have for dismissing this product or not investigating when there is clear evidence it works.
https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-...

Can the Ministry of Health provide all links to discussions of therapeutics in any briefing meeting whether in a private or public setting and minutes associated. It appears therapeutics could end this pandemic in New Zealand yet everyone is complicit in destroying the physical and mental health of people with lockdowns and experimental drugs. Why is this being overlooked?

If therapeutics are not being mentioned has the government been bought off by Pfizer - can Ashley please answer that?

Regards,
Chris

Link to this

From: OIA Requests


Attachment image001.png
7K Download


Kia ora Chris,

 

Thank you for your request for official information received on 21
September 2021 for:

 

"There is now irrefutable evidence that the vaccine risks outweigh the
benefits in young fit people especially children where there is a
thousand-fold increase in adverse reactions to the injections in 2021
compared to the last decade from ALL other vaccinations.

 

Already in New Zealand there are over 1,500 adverse reactions some very
serious and permanent in children when the risk to a healthy child who
gets Covid-19 and has to go to hospital is 44 per 1,000,000 a % of
0.0044%.  The following links provide testimony by experts to the Food and
Drug Administration who overwhelmingly voted 16-2 against booster shot
programmes with it even being discussed that the vaccines are killing more
people than they are helping and also driving the Covid mutations such as
Delta.  The two links are to testimony in front of the FDA outlining the
risks/issues.  Please confirm why is this evidence being ignored by the
Ministry of Health.

[1]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...

 

Can the Ministry of Health please provide the following urgently All
advice papers( including assessment of compliance with the NZ  Bill of
Rights Act) to the Minister on the Covid Public Health Response
Vaccination Order ( this is still outstanding despite repeated requests)
and the Cabinet advice and decision to approve the use of the Pfizervax
for children 12 and older despite the insignificant risk of Covid for
children and the many outstanding concerns about its short and long term
safety, efficacy, integrity and effectiveness against the Delta and other
strains

 

Provide all of the board/persons involved in who approved this vaccine for
12-15 year olds

 

Ashley Bloomfield has stated he requires a 90% vaccination rate.  Given
the number of adverse reactions to date across all age groups 45,331 I
would estimate there will be 200,000 plus reactions and already 40 deaths
in New Zealand.  Can the Ministry of Health provide the Cost/Benefit
analysis of this vaccine when virus deaths are so low in New Zealand.

 

Can you also provide the number of doctors that have been censured for
highlighting these risks which can now not be ignored and provide formal
apologies to these doctors

 

The following article also outlines that Covid-19 in India an area densely
populated with 265,000,000 people is mostly free from Covid with the usage
of Ivermectin.  Can you provide the number of doctors who have attempted
to sponsor Ivermectin products and if the Ministry of Health has dismissed
these and for what reasons?

 

Please note the USA is also prescribing Ivermectin for Afghan refugees who
arrive in the country.  What justification does Ashley have for dismissing
this product or not investigating when there is clear evidence it works.

[2]https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...

 

Can the Ministry of Health provide all links to discussions of
therapeutics in any briefing meeting whether in a private or public
setting and minutes associated.  It appears therapeutics could end this
pandemic in New Zealand yet everyone is complicit in destroying the
physical and mental health of people with lockdowns and experimental
drugs.  Why is this being overlooked?

 

If therapeutics are not being mentioned has the government been bought off
by Pfizer - can Ashley please answer that?”

 

The Ministry's reference number for your request is: H202112817.

 

As required under the Official Information Act 1982, the Ministry will
endeavour to respond to your request no later than 19 October 2021, being
20 working days after the day your request was received.

 

Due to the COVID-19 global pandemic response, the Ministry is experiencing
significantly higher volumes of queries and requests for information. If
we are unable to respond to your request within this time frame, we will
notify you of an extension of that time frame.

 

If you have any queries related to this request, please do not hesitate to
get in touch.

 

Ngâ mihi

 

OIA Services

Government Services

Office of the Director-General

Ministry of Health

E: [3][email address]

 

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...
2. https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&...
3. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

From: OIA Requests

Kia ora Chris

Thank you for your request for official information, received on 21
September 2021 requesting:  

 Can the Ministry of Health please provide the following urgently All
advice papers( including assessment of compliance with the NZ Bill of
Rights Act) to the Minister on the Covid Public Health Response
Vaccination Order ( this is still outstanding despite repeated requests)
and the Cabinet advice and decision to approve the use of the Pfizervax
for children 12 and older despite the insignificant risk of Covid for
children and the many outstanding concerns about its short and long term
safety, efficacy, integrity and effectiveness against the Delta and other
strains
Provide all of the board/persons involved in who approved this vaccine for
12-15 year olds
Ashley Bloomfield has stated he requires a 90% vaccination rate. Given the
number of adverse reactions to date across all age groups 45,331 I would
estimate there will be 200,000 plus reactions and already 40 deaths in New
Zealand. Can the Ministry of Health provide the Cost/Benefit analysis of
this vaccine when virus deaths are so low in New Zealand.
Can you also provide the number of doctors that have been censured for
highlighting these risks which can now not be ignored and provide formal
apologies to these doctors
The following article also outlines that Covid-19 in India an area densely
populated with 265,000,000 people is mostly free from Covid with the usage
of Ivermectin. Can you provide the number of doctors who have attempted to
sponsor Ivermectin products and if the Ministry of Health has dismissed
these and for what reasons?
Can the Ministry of Health provide all links to discussions of
therapeutics in any briefing meeting whether in a private or public
setting and minutes associated. It appears therapeutics could end this
pandemic in New Zealand yet everyone is complicit in destroying the
physical and mental health of people with lockdowns and experimental
drugs. Why is this being overlooked?
If therapeutics are not being mentioned has the government been bought off
by Pfizer - can Ashley please answer that?
The Ministry of Health has decided to extend the period of time available
to respond to your request under section 15A of the Official Information
Act 1982 (the Act) as further collation and consultation is required. 

You can now expect a response to your request on, or before, 9 November
2021.

You have the right, under section 28 of the Act, to ask the Ombudsman to
review my decision to extend the time available to respond to your
request.

Ngā mihi

OIA Services
Government Services
Office of the Director-General
Ministry of Health
E: [1][email address]

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

N.R.B left an annotation ()

Do people know that the pfizer/biontech and comirnaty are actually two vaccines, apparently interchangeable. Read top three paragraphs of document https://www.fda.gov/media/144414/downloa...

Link to this

victor left an annotation ()

NZ Stats.
0 - 49years.
100% recovery rate.

0 - 9y
1.55% hospitalization rate
O% ICU rate
100% recovery rate
0.xx case rate

10 - 19y
1.24% hospitalization rate
O.15% ICU rate
100% recovery rate
0.xx case rate

20 - 29y
2.89% hospitalization rate
O.25% ICU rate
100% recovery rate
0.xx case rate

30 - 39y
2.68% hospitalization rate
O.65% ICU rate
100% recovery rate
0.xx case rate

40 - 49y
9.26% hospitalization rate
1.02% ICU rate
100% recovery rate
0.xx case rate

Risk benefit profile was hidden or not produced and certainly has not be puliciced

MOH medsafe know there is only risk profile and that benefits are fallacy.

So they hide.

Link to this

Mr Rodgers left an annotation ()

"Do people know that the pfizer/biontech and comirnaty are actually two vaccines"

Did you actually read the link you provided?
Quote: "COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is an FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine made by Pfizer for BioNTech."

Quote: "The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or effectiveness."

Same manufacturer, same ingredients, just different names for different markets.

Link to this

N.R.B left an annotation ()

Did you miss the last sentence? 'Certain differences' is legally distinctive. Also plural, how many and what differences?
Lets look at some words.

Certain - specific but not explicitly named or stated

Differences - a point or way in which people or things are dissimilar

Series - One after another. Sequentially. The experiments were done in series.

[1] The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products can
be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or effectiveness
concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact safety or
effectiveness.

If a claim about safety and effectiveness is made then I must assume something was measured.

Link to this

Mr Rodgers left an annotation ()

Perhaps this might help:
https://www.nebraskamed.com/COVID/you-as...

"The confusion stems from this section of the FDA's Comirnaty Vaccine Information for Recipients and Caregivers sheet:

....

The FDA desires to have a single, combined Vaccine Information Sheet. A single sheet keeps things simple for the people administering and receiving the vaccines. Since the branded and unbranded vials of vaccines are chemically identical, despite being legally distinct, this information must be included."

Link to this

Chris McCashin left an annotation ()

There is one reason and one reason only as to why their are two vaccines. Cominarty is fully approved by the FDA - but BioNTech is not and will keep operating under the emergency use authorisation. Pfizer have not started manufacturing the Cominarty vaccine because there are thousands of BioNTech injections still available that have liability protection. They will keep administering BioNTech under the emergency use authorisation which shields them from liability.

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Chris McCashin please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Ministry of Health only: