Discontinuation of support for people with autism spectrum disorders

Jill Adams made this Official Information request to Ministry of Health

The request was refused by Ministry of Health.

From: Jill Adams

Dear Ministry of Health,

I have previously requested information about the discontinuation of support for people with autism spectrum disorders, however I did not receive the information I asked for.

You have sent to me a 2012 NASC flow chart that instructs NASC how to decline services for people with ASD.

I would like information about the origin of this decision to cut services for people with ASD. Whose decision was it to do this and what written information do you have, as background material to this decision, given there must have been some sort of discussion, meetings, policies developed, or lead up to this decision, which must be in some written form somewhere within the MOH?

Yours faithfully,

Jill Adams

Link to this

Ministry of Health

Hello

This email is to acknowledge receipt of your enquiry to our customer service team.

A response to your enquiry will be provided to you within 10 business days. If your enquiry is urgent, please contact us on 0800 855 066.

Please note our business hours are Monday to Friday, 8am to 5pm.

Kind regards
Customer Service Representative
National Contact Centre
Ministry of Health

In response to:

Official Information Act request - Discontinuation of support for people with autism spectrum disorders

Jill Adams
to:
OIA requests at MOH
21/10/2013 08:16 p.m.
Show Details

Dear Ministry of Health,

I have previously requested information about the discontinuation
of support for people with autism spectrum disorders, however I did
not receive the information I asked for.

You have sent to me a 2012 NASC flow chart that instructs NASC how
to decline services for people with ASD.

I would like information about the origin of this decision to cut
services for people with ASD. Whose decision was it to do this and
what written information do you have, as background material to
this decision, given there must have been some sort of discussion,
meetings, policies developed, or lead up to this decision, which
must be in some written form somewhere within the MOH?

Yours faithfully,

Jill Adams

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an OIA request done via the FYI website.

Please do not send progress updates as PDF files.

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

If you find this service useful as an OIA officer, please ask your
web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************

*************************************************************************************
This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway
*************************************************************************************

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Ministry of Health

Dear Ms Adams        

Thank you for your request for official information, received by the
Ministry of Health on 22 October 2013.

Your request has been received and logged.  As required under the Official
Information Act 1982, the Ministry will respond to your request within 20
working days.  You should receive a response on or before 19 November
2013.

If a large amount of information has been requested or if the Ministry
needs to consult in order to make a decision, we may need to extend this
date (this is provided for in section 15A of the Act).  We will advise you
if such an extension is necessary.

The Ministry's reference number for your request is: H201304362
Yours sincerely
 
Government Relations
Corporate Services
Ministry of Health
[1]mailto:[email address]
****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

hide quoted sections

Link to this

Ministry of Health


Attachment Response letter Request Under the OIA 1982 Ref H201304362.pdf
1.1M Download View as HTML


Dear Ms Adams        

Thank you for your request for official information, received by the
Ministry of Health on 22 October 2013.

Your request has been received, logged and responded to as required under
the Official Information Act 1982. Please find attached a response to your
query.

The Ministry's reference number for your request is: H201304362.

Yours sincerely
Challen Wilson
Executive Assistant
Disability Support Services
National Services Purchasing
National Health Board
Ministry of Health
DDI: 04 816 3322

[1]http://www.health.govt.nz
[2]mailto:[email address]

****************************************************************************
Statement of confidentiality: This e-mail message and any accompanying
attachments may contain information that is IN-CONFIDENCE and subject to
legal privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, use, disseminate,
distribute or copy this message or attachments.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete this message.
****************************************************************************

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by the Ministry of Health's Content and Virus Filtering Gateway

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. http://www.health.govt.nz/
2. mailto:[email address]

hide quoted sections

Link to this

From: Jill Adams

Dear Ministry of Health,

You have replied that
"there have been no specific decision or cut in services"
In Canterbury we have been advised that the following has changed or been cut:
* People with a new diagnosis will not be eligible for services
* People needing a higher level of support can no longer have an increase eg an increase in Carer Support (payment for respite)
* People can no longer ask for Individualized funding, personal care, domestic assistance.
* Support for adults is no longer available.

In my opinion your statement "the approach to ASD eligibility nationally is inconsistent" is appalling. Why has this been allowed to go on for such a long time? Why has this not been sorted out?

Also, on the flow chart, I find your question " Does your NASC currently accept some ASD only referral?" to be totally unacceptable. Why is the MOH asking NASCs if they will accept referrals for this group? Why is the MOH not directing the NASCs to take this group? This group have many amongst them who have a non - negotiable need for support. Families and agencies should not have to be advocating to NASCs for support.
The question that you have "Do they have ASD support related needs? " in my opinion should be the main question.

I have been advised that there are now ASD specific services in Canterbury.
This is what they look like in Canterbury:
* Respite - this is done privately, if unable to obtain then the respite houses are full, and have long waiting lists. On your flow chart it states 'National where available'. What does this mean and what is being done to increase services to make respite available?
* Behaviour support - this is now a national service, which has 26 places, this is full, with a long waiting list. Where is the availability here?
* ASD DHB coordination for new referrals

I believe that the cuts that have happened have resulted in services and supports going backwards. Is this a move to a position whereby there is a minimization, denial, or in any way a watering down of the need for support for this group of people who have ASD, with an ID? In my opinion,it appears that it is already happening.

I do not believe that I have received clear communication from these requests, and the information has raised more questions than has answered.

I would be very happy to be proven totally wrong regarding cuts to services, and happy to hear that all services that have been cut, reduced or are now not available, are totally reinstated.

Yours faithfully,

Jill Adams

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Ministry of Health only: