legal receipts, Byrne Vs NZTA, 2019
gerard byrne made this Official Information request to New Zealand Transport Agency
The request was refused by New Zealand Transport Agency.
From: gerard byrne
Dear New Zealand Transport Agency,
can you please provide a copy of all receipts from Kensington swan, in relation to the Byrne vs NZTA employment court hearing in Nov, 2019.
you know the one which you lost and were found to be breaking the law.
Yours faithfully,
gerard byrne
From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency
Dear Gerard
This email acknowledges your attached request for information made under
the Official Information Act 1982.
Your request has been forwarded to the appropriate section of the
Transport Agency for response. They will contact you if they require
clarification of your request, more time to respond, or if your request
has been transferred to another organisation to respond to. Unless more
time is required, the Transport Agency will send a response to you within
20 working days of receiving your request – in this instance on or before
14 February 2020.
If you would like to discuss your request with the Transport Agency,
please contact us by email at [1][email address].
Regards
_________ __________________________________________
Ministerial Services
Government | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
National Office / 50 Victoria Street
Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand
_________ _____________________________________
[2]cid:image002.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [3]cid:image003.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [4]cid:image004.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0
Find the latest transport news, information, and advice on our website:
[5]www.nzta.govt.nz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may
contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you must delete
this email and may not use any information contained in it. Legal
privilege is not waived because you have read this email.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://www.facebook.com/TransportAgency
3. https://twitter.com/nzta_news
4. http://www.youtube.com/user/NZTransportA...
5. http://www.nzta.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
From: Official Correspondence
New Zealand Transport Agency
Dear Gerard
Please find attached the response to your request of 6 January 2020 for
information under the Official Information Act 1982.
Regards
_________ __________________________________________
Ministerial Services
Government | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
National Office / 50 Victoria Street
Private Bag 6995, Wellington 6141, New Zealand
_________ _____________________________________
[1]cid:image002.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [2]cid:image003.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0 [3]cid:image004.jpg@01D56496.5A7CD4A0
Find the latest transport news, information, and advice on our website:
[4]www.nzta.govt.nz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is only intended to be read by the named recipient. It may
contain information which is confidential, proprietary or the subject of
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you must delete
this email and may not use any information contained in it. Legal
privilege is not waived because you have read this email.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.facebook.com/TransportAgency
2. https://twitter.com/nzta_news
3. http://www.youtube.com/user/NZTransportA...
4. http://www.nzta.govt.nz/
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
gerard byrne left an annotation ()
Dear Chris Lokum. it is only still ongoing because your counsel are fighting over $4500 . it will be interesting to see how much your counsel charge us taxpayers for that.
Link to this