Privacy Breach
Hannah Baxter made this Official Information request to New Zealand Police
The request was successful.
From: Hannah Baxter
Dear New Zealand Police,
Whether it is routine protocol for an officer at a traffic stop, such as a TAG checkpoint, to contact a subject driver's employer giving the employees name and nature of the traffic stop?
No offence was committed.
Yours faithfully,
Curious
New Zealand Police
Kia ora Hannah
I refer to your request of 9 December 2019 as below.
Your request is being actioned pursuant to the Official Information
Act 1982.
Kind regards
Ministerial Services
PNHQ
-----"Hannah Baxter" <[FOI #11837 email]>
wrote: -----
To: "OIA/LGOIMA requests at New Zealand Police"
<[New Zealand Police request email]>
From: "Hannah Baxter" <[FOI #11837 email]>
Date: 09/12/2019 08:56AM
Subject: Official Information request - Privacy Breach
Dear New Zealand Police,
Whether it is routine protocol for an officer at a traffic stop, such as a
TAG checkpoint, to contact a subject driver's employer giving the
employees name and nature of the traffic stop?
No offence was committed.
Yours faithfully,
Curious
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #11837 email]
Is [New Zealand Police request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to New Zealand Police? If so, please contact us using
this form:
[1]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[2]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
===============================================================
WARNING
The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.
Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately
References
Visible links
1. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
2. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
New Zealand Police
Kia ora Hannah
Please find attached the NZ Police response to your request.
Kind regards
Ministerial Services
PNHQ
===============================================================
WARNING
The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.
Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately
Connor Miller left an annotation ()
This request took much longer than 20 days to complete.
Mr Rodgers left an annotation ()
"This request took much longer than 20 days to complete."
No it didn't. There is a working day "holiday" from 25 Dec through to 15 Jan. In this particular case, they just squeaked in on the 20 day mark.
(9/12 to 28/01 minus 25/12 to 15/01)
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
Offensive? Unsuitable?
Requests for personal information and vexatious requests are not considered valid requests for Official Information (read more).
If you believe this request is not suitable, you can report it for attention by the site administrators
Report this request
[User 7569 name removed] (Account suspended) left an annotation ()
Of course it is not.
I hope you have made a complaint to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner.
Link to this