We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Shaharn Rushton please sign in and let everyone know.

ORIF Distal Radius

Shaharn Rushton made this Official Information request to Accident Compensation Corporation

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Shaharn Rushton to read a recent response and update the status.

From: Shaharn Rushton

Dear Accident Compensation Corporation,

Can you please provide how many times the following codes have been approved for surgery in NZ over the last 5 years; Core Item ID ELF09, ELF11

Yours faithfully,

S Rushton

Link to this

From: Government Services
Accident Compensation Corporation

Good afternoon Shaharn

 

Please find below the response to your 16 May 2018 information request.

 

Table 1: Count of accepted claims with selected service items code broken
down by elective surgery status between 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2017.
Elective
Service Item code Surgery 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Status
Approved
- 10 17 13 19 25
surgery
unlikely
Declined 4 <4 <4    
Surgery      
ELF09 - Orif Fracture happened <4 <4
Radius Or Ulna Surgery
happened        
-
invoiced <4
Surgery
happened 54 50 55 57 56
- paid
Approved
- 9
surgery
unlikely <4 <4 <4 <4
ELF11 - Awaiting        
Reconstr./Corrective Approval <4
Osteotomy Radius Declined <4 <4 <4 <4 <4
Surgery    
happened <4 <4 <4
Surgery
happened 29 24 15 15 21
- paid
Grand total 109 101 92 97 106

 

 

Interpreting the information

o A financial year is 1 July to 30 June.
o Accredited employer claims are excluded from the information.
o Only claims with an accepted cover decision have been included.
o The financial year in which the service was paid may differ to the
financial year in which the service was provided.
o The data was extracted on 8 June 2018 and may differ if run at a later
date.

 

Privacy

ACC does not disclose data below a certain level to protect the privacy of
individuals. This decision is made under section 9(2)(a) of the Official
Information Act 1982. Accordingly, we have used the value <4 where the
claim count is between one and three. This limits the potential for
particular individuals or matters specific to certain individuals from
being identified. Withholding in this way is necessary to protect the
privacy of these individuals. In doing so, we have considered the public
interest in making the information available and have determined that it
does not outweigh the need to protect the privacy of these individuals. 

 

Regards

Government Engagement and Support

Disclaimer:

"This message and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you believe you have received this email in error, please
advise us immediately by return email or telephone and then delete this
email together with all attachments. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are not authorised to use or copy this message or any
attachments or disclose the contents to any other person."

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Shaharn Rushton please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Accident Compensation Corporation only: