Request for data on internal HR complaints, investigations, and resolution outcomes – 30 June 2021 to 31 August 2025

Phoebe Robertson made this Official Information request to Ministry for the Environment

Currently waiting for a response from Ministry for the Environment, they must respond promptly and normally no later than (details and exceptions).

From: Phoebe Robertson

Dear Ministry for the Environment,

This request is part of a broader project on psychological safety and HR practices in the public sector.

Pursuant to the Official Information Act 1982, I request the following information relating to internal staff complaints made to Human Resources between 30 June 2021 and 31 August 2025.

1. Total Complaints & Monthly Breakdown

Please provide:
• The total number of internal staff complaints raised with HR (including, but not limited to, complaints relating to bullying, harassment, discrimination, cultural safety, or psychologically unsafe environments)
• A monthly breakdown of these complaints over the requested period, to allow identification of trends

2. Resolution Pathways

For the complaints identified above, please advise:
a. How many were formally investigated
b. How many were informally closed, redirected, or deemed “resolved without investigation”
c. How many were withdrawn by the complainant
    • If recorded, please include any noted reasons for withdrawal (e.g. staff exit, concern about reprisal, mediation)
d. The outcome of each complaint, recorded in aggregated form, e.g.:
    • No action taken
    • Informal resolution
    • Escalated to formal action or investigation
    • Referred to external mediator
    • Staff resignation or exit
    • Disciplinary action
e. How many complaints remained open or unresolved for longer than 6 months, and how many remained unresolved after 12 months
f. Of the complaints that were closed informally or not investigated, how many were closed with no documented follow-up action or engagement with the complainant?

3. Time to Resolution
• The average and median time taken to resolve or close complaints, measured from the date of receipt to final resolution or closure
• If feasible, a comparison between complaints that were formally investigated and those informally closed or redirected

4. Complaint Characteristics

If recorded, please provide an aggregated breakdown of complaints by:
• Business group / Directorate
• Ethnicity of the complainant (e.g. Māori, Pākehā, Pacific, Asian)
• Nature or category of complaint (e.g. bullying, harassment, discrimination, cultural safety concerns, unsafe workplace)
• Whether the complaint involved the conduct of a manager or team leader
• Whether the complainant exited the Ministry within 12 months of the complaint being made

5. Multiple Complaints & Repeat Concerns

If recorded, please advise:
• Whether any individuals (particularly those in managerial or leadership positions) were the subject of more than one complaint during the period
• An anonymised count of such repeat instances (e.g., “3 managers were subject to 2 or more complaints each between 2021–2025”)

6. Reporting to Senior Leadership

Please provide any internal guidance, policy, or documented practice that sets out:
• When and how complaints about managers or team leaders are required to be reported to:
• the relevant General Manager
• the Chief Executive
• the People & Culture Governance Group, Audit & Risk Committee, or other internal forums
• Whether the Ministry has a threshold or risk rating system to determine which complaints are escalated to senior leadership
• Whether complaints involving repeat allegations or staff exits are flagged or tracked at a leadership or governance level

7. Manager–Manager Complaint Dynamics

Please advise:
• How complaints made about managers by other managers (e.g. inter-leader bullying, conflict, or misuse of process) are managed
• Whether there are internal rules or protections in place to ensure such complaints are independently investigated, and not handled by close peers or reporting lines (e.g. a GM and their direct reports)

8. Transparency of Investigations & Risk Tracking
• Whether the Ministry maintains any risk register, dashboard, or tracking tool that monitors:
• The volume and category of internal HR complaints
• The number of unresolved or repeat complaints involving the same individuals
• Complaints with themes of psychological harm, cultural safety, or retaliation
• If such a register or tool exists, please provide:
• A high-level description of its structure and oversight
• Which teams or leadership roles have access to it

9. Escalation Frameworks

Please provide:
• Any internal HR policies, guidance documents, or decision-making frameworks that outline how complaints are assessed and escalated to:
• Senior leadership
• The Chief Executive
• Internal governance or assurance forums
• Any specific criteria or thresholds used to determine when a complaint should be:
• Formally investigated
• Escalated to an external mediator
• Reported to internal audit or external bodies

Format and Privacy
• Please provide the information in spreadsheet format (CSV or Excel) where possible
• I understand that some individual-level details may be withheld under section 9 of the Act. I request that anonymised or aggregated versions be provided to allow for pattern analysis.
• Where information is withheld, please state the specific grounds relied upon under the Act.

Ngā mihi,
Phoebe Robertson

Link to this

From: Taku Mahi
Ministry for the Environment

Kia ora Phoebe Robertson,

Thank you for your Official Information Act request received on
25/09/2025.

We will endeavour to respond to your request as soon as possible and in
any event no later than 20 working days after the day your request was
received. If we are unable to respond to your request by then, we will
notify you of an extension to that timeframe.

Please note the Ministry for the Environment will release responses to
selected OIA requests on our [1]OIA responses page shortly after the
response has been sent.

If you have any queries, please feel free to contact us at
[MFE request email].

Please note that this Taku Mahi inbox is not monitored.

Ngâ mihi nui

Ministerial Services Team 

Ministry for the Environment – Manatû Mô Te Taiao

Email: [MFE request email] Website: [2]www.mfe.govt.nz 

8 Willis Street, Wellington Central, Wellington 6011

References

Visible links
1. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/about-us/official...
2. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/

Link to this

From: OIA
Ministry for the Environment


Attachment OIAD 1764 Notification of extension.pdf
302K Download View as HTML


Kia ora Phoebe
Please find attached a notification of extension for your request.
Ngâ mihi
Matthew

Ministerial Services Team 

Ministry for the Environment – Manatû Mô Te Taiao

Email: [1][MFE request email] Website: [2]www.mfe.govt.nz 

8 Willis Street, Wellington Central, Wellington 6011

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Phoebe Robertson <[FOI #32387 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2025 6:35 PM
To: OIA <[MFE request email]>
Subject: Official Information request - Request for data on internal HR
complaints, investigations, and resolution outcomes – 30 June 2021 to 31
August 2025
 
MFE CYBER SECURITY WARNING
This email originated from outside our organisation. Please take extra
care when clicking on any links or opening any attachments.

Dear Ministry for the Environment,

This request is part of a broader project on psychological safety and HR
practices in the public sector.

Pursuant to the Official Information Act 1982, I request the following
information relating to internal staff complaints made to Human Resources
between 30 June 2021 and 31 August 2025.

1. Total Complaints & Monthly Breakdown

Please provide:
        •       The total number of internal staff complaints raised with
HR (including, but not limited to, complaints relating to bullying,
harassment, discrimination, cultural safety, or psychologically unsafe
environments)
        •       A monthly breakdown of these complaints over the requested
period, to allow identification of trends

2. Resolution Pathways

For the complaints identified above, please advise:
a. How many were formally investigated
b. How many were informally closed, redirected, or deemed “resolved
without investigation”
c. How many were withdrawn by the complainant
    • If recorded, please include any noted reasons for withdrawal (e.g.
staff exit, concern about reprisal, mediation)
d. The outcome of each complaint, recorded in aggregated form, e.g.:
    • No action taken
    • Informal resolution
    • Escalated to formal action or investigation
    • Referred to external mediator
    • Staff resignation or exit
    • Disciplinary action
e. How many complaints remained open or unresolved for longer than 6
months, and how many remained unresolved after 12 months
f. Of the complaints that were closed informally or not investigated, how
many were closed with no documented follow-up action or engagement with
the complainant?

3. Time to Resolution
        •       The average and median time taken to resolve or close
complaints, measured from the date of receipt to final resolution or
closure
        •       If feasible, a comparison between complaints that were
formally investigated and those informally closed or redirected

4. Complaint Characteristics

If recorded, please provide an aggregated breakdown of complaints by:
        •       Business group / Directorate
        •       Ethnicity of the complainant (e.g. Mâori, Pâkehâ, Pacific,
Asian)
        •       Nature or category of complaint (e.g. bullying,
harassment, discrimination, cultural safety concerns, unsafe workplace)
        •       Whether the complaint involved the conduct of a manager or
team leader
        •       Whether the complainant exited the Ministry within 12
months of the complaint being made

5. Multiple Complaints & Repeat Concerns

If recorded, please advise:
        •       Whether any individuals (particularly those in managerial
or leadership positions) were the subject of more than one complaint
during the period
        •       An anonymised count of such repeat instances (e.g., “3
managers were subject to 2 or more complaints each between 2021–2025”)

6. Reporting to Senior Leadership

Please provide any internal guidance, policy, or documented practice that
sets out:
        •       When and how complaints about managers or team leaders are
required to be reported to:
        •       the relevant General Manager
        •       the Chief Executive
        •       the People & Culture Governance Group, Audit & Risk
Committee, or other internal forums
        •       Whether the Ministry has a threshold or risk rating system
to determine which complaints are escalated to senior leadership
        •       Whether complaints involving repeat allegations or staff
exits are flagged or tracked at a leadership or governance level

7. Manager–Manager Complaint Dynamics

Please advise:
        •       How complaints made about managers by other managers (e.g.
inter-leader bullying, conflict, or misuse of process) are managed
        •       Whether there are internal rules or protections in place
to ensure such complaints are independently investigated, and not handled
by close peers or reporting lines (e.g. a GM and their direct reports)

8. Transparency of Investigations & Risk Tracking
        •       Whether the Ministry maintains any risk register,
dashboard, or tracking tool that monitors:
        •       The volume and category of internal HR complaints
        •       The number of unresolved or repeat complaints involving
the same individuals
        •       Complaints with themes of psychological harm, cultural
safety, or retaliation
        •       If such a register or tool exists, please provide:
        •       A high-level description of its structure and oversight
        •       Which teams or leadership roles have access to it

9. Escalation Frameworks

Please provide:
        •       Any internal HR policies, guidance documents, or
decision-making frameworks that outline how complaints are assessed and
escalated to:
        •       Senior leadership
        •       The Chief Executive
        •       Internal governance or assurance forums
        •       Any specific criteria or thresholds used to determine when
a complaint should be:
        •       Formally investigated
        •       Escalated to an external mediator
        •       Reported to internal audit or external bodies

Format and Privacy
        •       Please provide the information in spreadsheet format (CSV
or Excel) where possible
        •       I understand that some individual-level details may be
withheld under section 9 of the Act. I request that anonymised or
aggregated versions be provided to allow for pattern analysis.
        •       Where information is withheld, please state the specific
grounds relied upon under the Act.

Ngâ mihi,
Phoebe Robertson

-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #32387 email]

Is [MFE request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to
Ministry for the Environment? If so, please contact us using this form:
[3]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[4]https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[MFE request email]
2. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/
3. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
4. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers

Link to this

From: Phoebe Robertson

noted, thanks Matt.

Yours sincerely,

Phoebe Robertson

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Ministry for the Environment only: