Half life of the Pfizer vaccine in the human body
Erika Whittome made this Official Information request to University of Auckland
Currently waiting for a response from University of Auckland, they must respond promptly and normally no later than (details and exceptions).
From: Erika Whittome
Dear University of Auckland,
This request is to Ms Petoussis Harris under your employ who recently gave evidence at the royal Covid enquiry last week. She said that the vaccine and its associated manufactured spike proteins break down in a couple of days in the human body.
This information request is to her:
I note that the product Comirnaty which Medsafe approved has the following description on its data sheet:
"The active ingredient is a single-stranded, 5’-capped messenger RNA (mRNA) produced using a cell-free in vitro transcription from the corresponding DNA templates, encoding the viral spike (S) protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). ".
1. Is the messenger ribonucleic acid or mRNA a genetic material?
2. What is the excretion and half-life of this active ingredient?
3. When does the messenger ribonucleic acid cease to give instructions to DNA in the human recipient?
Yours faithfully,
Erika Whittome
From: Erika Whittome
Dear University of Auckland & Ms Petoussis-Harris,
COVID-19 mRNA and adenoviral vector products function by delivering genetic instructions to human cells, which then produce foreign proteins (like the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein). This mechanism directly aligns with the FDA's own definitions of "gene therapy products."
The FDA has established the regulatory definition of gene therapy products through its authoritative guidance documents, specifically: "Guidance for Human Somatic Cell Therapy and Gene Therapy" (1998), which states that
"Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use," and "Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control (CMC) Information for Human Gene Therapy Investigational New Drug Applications" (2020), which defines gene therapy products as those that "mediate their effects by transcription and/or translation of transferred genetic material and/or by integrating into the host genome." These guidance documents are binding on the FDA under the Accardi doctrine, United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954), which prohibits agencies from departing from their own established rules, procedures, or interpretive frameworks without adequate justification.
See United States ex rel. Accardi v. Shaughnessy, 347 U.S. 260 (1954).
(From
https://www.regulations.gov/document/FDA...)
Yours faithfully,
Erika Whittome
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence
SPENCER JONES left an annotation ()
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research 4(1)
https://doi.org/10.56098/hqjnk479
From Innovation to Inquiry — COVID -19 mRNA
Vaccination and Its Global Consequences —
with Special Reference to New Zealand
Bruce Rapley, PhD
Consultant and Independent Researcher, Smart Technology, New Zealand;
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic involved the rapid deployment of novel biomedical technologies. Chief
among them were synthetic RNAs, introduced with limited longitudinal data, yet supported by
institutional consensus, and expedited regulatory pathways. Subsequent developments revealed
questions regarding safety, ethics, efficacy, and governance. This formal review, with specific
reference to New Zealand, examines the COVID-19 response, using synthetic RNA distributed
under Emergency Use Authorizations. A range of post-deployment signals, including immunological
anomalies (IgG4 class switching), clotting disorders, and residual DNA elements, remain
insufficiently investigated. Regulatory responses have not met the standard of precaution typically
applied to novel gene therapies. At the same time, low-cost interventions such as ivermectin were de-
prioritized, or suppressed. The temporal association between vaccine rollouts and excess non-
COVID mortality in several high-uptake nations warrants systematic, transparent analysis. To date,
no national authority has published comprehensive disaggregated mortality data by vaccination
status.
Keywords: adverse events, COVID-19 vaccination, Emergency Use Authorization, EUA, genetic engineering, IgG4 class
switching, mRNA vaccination, plasmid DNA, post-market surveillance, therapeutic suppression, ivermectin, spike protein toxicity,
regulatory oversight failure, scientific censorship, turbo cancer, vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, VITT
Link to this