'Big Tech' select agreements for NZ Schools
Dave Lane made this Official Information request to Ministry of Education
This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for Dave Lane to read recent responses and update the status.
From: Dave Lane
Dear Ministry of Education,
In the light of the recently re-signed agreements with Microsoft and Google, I'd like to revisit my previous request for information about the rationale behind purchasing Microsoft and Google products for all NZ schools at a national level. Previously, a similar query resulted in a response admitting that the Min of Ed had *lost* the agreements you had a signed with both Microsoft and Google. Similarly, it became apparent that your weekly meetings with both foreign multinationals are not minuted. Great access for them, no accountability for all of us in NZ. I'm hoping that this time around such poor process won't be repeated.
I am keen to understand the decision making process and other considerations surrounding the profound decision by the Ministry of Education to supply, based on national-level agreements, Microsoft and Google digital services to (nearly) all primary, secondary, and tertiary educational institutions in Aotearoa NZ.
These services are now deeply woven into the fabric of almost all of our schools, and have become crucial dependencies across the curriculum and communications between students, schools, and the community. They frame and mediate almost every digital activity taking place in almost all our educational contexts. This has profoundly influenced (and limited) the now pervasive incorporation of digital technologies through our entire education system.
I request the following information from the Ministry:
1. the tender documents that resulted in Microsoft and Google becoming primary suppliers of technologies for schools throughout New Zealand
2. the role(s) within the Ministry responsible for signing-off the decision to *renew* the procurement of Microsoft and Google technologies for schools.
3. the name(s) of the Ministry department(s) (and in which Ministry) which negotiated the contracts with Microsoft and Google.
4. any documents by external (to the MoE) experts, identifying and comparing digital technology options with relevance to this decision.
5. dated minutes (including list of attendees) of meetings in which the renewal Microsoft and/or Google technology agreements were discussed.
6. any documents identifying alternatives to Microsoft and Google technologies, that were considered but dismissed, and any documents explaining reasons why.
7. a timeline of meetings between the Ministry staff and Microsoft and Google employees (or their commercial partners) including minutes and attendance.
8. a list of any external experts consulted in the course of this process, including any declarations of pecuniary interests (or noting that those were never requested).
9. any advice from external experts regarding the pedagogic or cultural suitability of Microsoft or Google technologies as the dominant technologies in NZ schools.
10. any documents pertaining to the 'terms of use' or 'terms of service' of the Microsoft and Google services adopted (e.g. MS Office 365 and Google Classroom/Hapara), including any reviews covering the legal liabilities, e.g. legal opinions.
11. any documents/communications offering information/guidance to school boards adopting these technologies or raising concerns.
12. any documents/communications (internal or otherwise) discussing the balance of responsibility/liability between the Ministry of Education and school trustees, especially regarding the relationship between Microsoft & Google and school students and/or their parents/guardians. This should include an discussion of informed consent or compliance or related concerns.
13. any documents/communications discussing legal liabilities related to procurement of these digital technologies (or competing technologies, subsequently not selected) in relation to NZ's obligations under the CPTPP agreement and its Investor State Dispute Settlement provisions.
14. any documents/communications discussing how the Ministry would respond to either small or large scale refusal (by school boards or parents/guardians) to accept the terms of use of either the Microsoft or Google digital services, and any advice the have had, either legal or from adjacent organisations like the NZSTA.
15. any documents/communications discussing the Ministry's role in informing and advising school trustees on the terms of use of Microsoft and Google digital technologies and managing liabilities like breaches or responding to changes to those terms which the vendors claim the right to make at their whim.
16. any documents/communications discussing concerns about ways in which Microsoft or Google might use (for profit or otherwise) the data or metadata generated by members of the education community, e.g. students, educators, staff, and parents/guardians, on whom the use of these technologies was imposed.
17. any documents/communications mentioning the term 'colonisation' in relation the adoption of Microsoft and Google digital tools.
Many thanks for your assistance in this matter.
Nāku noa, nā,
Dave Lane
From: Enquiries National
Ministry of Education
Thank you for your email to the Ministry of Education.
This is an auto generated response confirming your email has been received.
Please do not respond to this message.
We will respond to your email as soon as possible.
Tēnā koe mō tō īmēra mai ki te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga.
He urupare aunoa tēnei hei whakaatu kua tae mai tō īmēra
ki a mātou. Kaua noa e whakautu i tēnei karere.
Mea ake nei ka urupare tonu atu mātou ki tō īmēra.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is
confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
email and attachments is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please notify the author immediately and erase all copies of the
email and attachments. The Ministry of Education accepts no
responsibility for changes made to this message or attachments after
transmission from the Ministry.
hide quoted sections
From: Enquiries National
Ministry of Education
Kia ora Dave
Thank you for the information request below. The Ministry will consider
and respond to your request in accordance with the Official Information
Act 1982 (the Act).
Under section 15(1) of the Act, we are required to make and inform you of
our decision on your request as soon as reasonably practicable and in any
case not later than 20 working days after the day on which your request is
received. You can therefore expect to receive our decision on your
request on or before the 7 February 2025. If more than 20 working days
are needed due to the potential workload and/or consultations involved in
answering your request, we will notify you accordingly.
Please note, the period between 25 December – 15 January are not
considered to be “working days” for the purposes of calculating the 20
working day timeframe for providing a response under the Act.
In the interim, if you have any questions about your request, please email
[1][email address].
Ngā mihi
Enquiries National Team | Te Tāhuhu o te Mātauranga | Ministry of
Education | PN education.govt.nz
We shape an education system that delivers equitable and excellent
outcomes He mea tārai e mātou te mātauranga kia rangatira ai, kia mana
taurite ai ōna
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Lane <[2][FOI #29607 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2024 5:38 PM
To: Enquiries National <[3][email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - 'Big Tech' select agreements for
NZ Schools
[You don't often get email from
[4][FOI #29607 email]. Learn why this is
important at [5]https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]
Dear Ministry of Education,
In the light of the recently re-signed agreements with Microsoft and
Google, I'd like to revisit my previous request for information about the
rationale behind purchasing Microsoft and Google products for all NZ
schools at a national level. Previously, a similar query resulted in a
response admitting that the Min of Ed had *lost* the agreements you had a
signed with both Microsoft and Google. Similarly, it became apparent that
your weekly meetings with both foreign multinationals are not minuted.
Great access for them, no accountability for all of us in NZ. I'm hoping
that this time around such poor process won't be repeated.
I am keen to understand the decision making process and other
considerations surrounding the profound decision by the Ministry of
Education to supply, based on national-level agreements, Microsoft and
Google digital services to (nearly) all primary, secondary, and tertiary
educational institutions in Aotearoa NZ.
These services are now deeply woven into the fabric of almost all of our
schools, and have become crucial dependencies across the curriculum and
communications between students, schools, and the community. They frame
and mediate almost every digital activity taking place in almost all our
educational contexts. This has profoundly influenced (and limited) the now
pervasive incorporation of digital technologies through our entire
education system.
I request the following information from the Ministry:
1. the tender documents that resulted in Microsoft and Google becoming
primary suppliers of technologies for schools throughout New Zealand 2.
the role(s) within the Ministry responsible for signing-off the decision
to *renew* the procurement of Microsoft and Google technologies for
schools.
3. the name(s) of the Ministry department(s) (and in which Ministry) which
negotiated the contracts with Microsoft and Google.
4. any documents by external (to the MoE) experts, identifying and
comparing digital technology options with relevance to this decision.
5. dated minutes (including list of attendees) of meetings in which the
renewal Microsoft and/or Google technology agreements were discussed.
6. any documents identifying alternatives to Microsoft and Google
technologies, that were considered but dismissed, and any documents
explaining reasons why.
7. a timeline of meetings between the Ministry staff and Microsoft and
Google employees (or their commercial partners) including minutes and
attendance.
8. a list of any external experts consulted in the course of this process,
including any declarations of pecuniary interests (or noting that those
were never requested).
9. any advice from external experts regarding the pedagogic or cultural
suitability of Microsoft or Google technologies as the dominant
technologies in NZ schools.
10. any documents pertaining to the 'terms of use' or 'terms of service'
of the Microsoft and Google services adopted (e.g. MS Office 365 and
Google Classroom/Hapara), including any reviews covering the legal
liabilities, e.g. legal opinions.
11. any documents/communications offering information/guidance to school
boards adopting these technologies or raising concerns.
12. any documents/communications (internal or otherwise) discussing the
balance of responsibility/liability between the Ministry of Education and
school trustees, especially regarding the relationship between Microsoft &
Google and school students and/or their parents/guardians. This should
include an discussion of informed consent or compliance or related
concerns.
13. any documents/communications discussing legal liabilities related to
procurement of these digital technologies (or competing technologies,
subsequently not selected) in relation to NZ's obligations under the CPTPP
agreement and its Investor State Dispute Settlement provisions.
14. any documents/communications discussing how the Ministry would respond
to either small or large scale refusal (by school boards or
parents/guardians) to accept the terms of use of either the Microsoft or
Google digital services, and any advice the have had, either legal or from
adjacent organisations like the NZSTA.
15. any documents/communications discussing the Ministry's role in
informing and advising school trustees on the terms of use of Microsoft
and Google digital technologies and managing liabilities like breaches or
responding to changes to those terms which the vendors claim the right to
make at their whim.
16. any documents/communications discussing concerns about ways in which
Microsoft or Google might use (for profit or otherwise) the data or
metadata generated by members of the education community, e.g. students,
educators, staff, and parents/guardians, on whom the use of these
technologies was imposed.
17. any documents/communications mentioning the term 'colonisation' in
relation the adoption of Microsoft and Google digital tools.
Many thanks for your assistance in this matter.
Nāku noa, nā,
Dave Lane
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[6][FOI #29607 email]
Is [7][Ministry of Education request email] the wrong address for Official
Information requests to Ministry of Education? If so, please contact us
using this form:
[8]https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[9]https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please
ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA
page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is
confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
email and attachments is prohibited. If you have received this email in
error please notify the author immediately and erase all copies of the
email and attachments. The Ministry of Education accepts no responsibility
for changes made to this message or attachments after transmission from
the Ministry.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. mailto:[FOI #29607 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. mailto:[FOI #29607 email]
5. https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific...
6. mailto:[FOI #29607 email]
7. mailto:[Ministry of Education request email]
8. https://fyi.org.nz/change_request/new?bo...
9. https://fyi.org.nz/help/officers
hide quoted sections
Things to do with this request
- Add an annotation (to help the requester or others)
- Download a zip file of all correspondence