Dear University of Otago,

I understand that the Faculty of Dentistry decided to remove UCAT as a requirement for entry into the BDS program from 2025 onwards, citing equity as the reason. I was hoping you could elaborate further on how the UCAT affects equity in this context.

The UCAT (and previously the UMAT) has been used by the University of Otago since 2008 and also by other universities internationally as early as 2006 as a tool for assessing abilities and qualities essential for healthcare professionals. It was and still is (in other universities) a crucial entry requirement for many medical and dental schools. It is crucial to assess individual's critical thinking and problem-solving, decision-making under pressure, interpersonal skills and empathy, and ethical reasoning.

Such skills are not easily measured by academic grades alone. I believe a test like the UCAT provides an equal opportunity for all candidates to demonstrate these abilities, which are essential for becoming a competent healthcare professional.

For domestic students, the cost of the exam could potentially be covered through a cost-related course from StudyLink, ensuring accessibility for all applicants.

Given that candidates are already incurring tuition fees or loans to pursue health sciences and apply for dentistry, the UCAT cost seems relatively manageable in comparison. Could you please clarify further how removing the UCAT aligns with equity principles?

Yours faithfully,

Laura Black