This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Planning Committee meeting held on Thursday, 6 May 2021'.

 
 
  
 
 
Kōmiti Whakarite Mahere / Planning Committee 
 
CONFIDENTIAL MINUTES 
 
 
 
Confidential  minutes  of  a  meeting  of  the  Planning  Committee  held  in  the  Reception  Lounge, 
Auckland Town Hall, 301-305 Queen Street, Auckland on Thursday, 6 May 2021 at 10.03am. 
 
 



Planning Committee 
06 May 2021 
  
 
 
The confidential section of the meeting commenced at 2.56pm. 
 
 
C1 
Auckland Unitary Plan - Plan Change 26 - Clarifying the Relationship Between the 
Special Character Areas Overlay and Underlying Zone Provisions - Appeals
 
 
Cr C Fletcher declared an interest in Item C1: Auckland Unitary Plan - Plan Change 26 - 
Clarifying the Relationship Between the Special Character Areas Overlay and Underlying 
Zone Provisions - Appeals and took no part in the debate or vote on the matter. 
 
A presentation was provided. A copy has been placed on the official minutes and is 
available as a confidential minutes attachment.  
 
Mayor P Goff retired from the meeting at 3.11pm  
Cr C Fletcher retired from the meeting 3.19pm 

 
Note:  changes were incorporated, amending clause b), with the agreement of the meeting. 
 
Resolution number PLA/2021/44 
MOVED by Cr C Darby, seconded by Cr T Mulholland:   
That the Planning Committee: 
a) 
withdraw Plan Change 26 - Clarifying the Relationship Between the Special 
Character Areas Overlay and Underlying Zone Provisions under clause 8D of 
the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) for the 
following reasons: 

i) 
overall, the decision version of Plan Change 26 does not achieve better 
outcomes than can be achieved without the plan change; 

ii) 
the resource consent process efficiencies gained by clarifying which 
provisions have greater weight are outweighed by the outcomes that 
could result if greater weight is always afforded to the Special Character 
Areas overlay provisions; 

iii) 
the council’s resource consent practice was adjusted after the Budden 
Environment Court declaration and the approach adopted is proving to be 
not as onerous for both applicants and the council as first thought, when 
the plan change was prepared and publicly notified; 

iv) 
the appeals are unlikely to be resolved without proceeding to a hearing. 
Costs would be incurred in defending the decision on Plan Change 26, 
which is an inefficient use of resources given the decision does not 
achieve better outcomes; and 

v) 
Kāinga Ora’s appeal raises issues regarding the relevance of the National 
Policy Statement on Urban Development to the geographical extent of the 
Special Character Areas overlay. It is far more appropriate to deal with the 
extent of the Special Character Areas overlay and underlying zones in a 
comprehensive and integrated manner as part of implementing the 
National Policy Statement on Urban Development than through the Plan 
Change 26 appeal process. 

Restatement 
b) 
agree that the agenda report remain confidential, and that the resolutions be 
publicly restated within the next two weeks.  

CARRIED 
 
 
 
 
Confidential Minutes 
Page 3 
 


Planning Committee 
06 May 2021 
  
 
 
Attachments 

6 May 2021, Planning Committee: Item C1 - Auckland Unitary Plan - Plan Change 26 - 
Clarifying the Relationship Between the Special Character Areas Overlay and 
Underlying Zone Provisions - Appeals, presentation  
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.32pm 
The Chairperson thanked Members for their attendance 
and  attention  to  business  and  declared  the  meeting 
closed. 
 
CONFIRMED AS A TRUE AND CORRECT RECORD 
AT  A  MEETING  OF  THE  PLANNING  COMMITTEE 
HELD ON 
 
 
 
DATE:......................................................................... 
 
 
 
CHAIRPERSON:....................................................... 
 
Confidential Minutes 
Page 4 
 

Document Outline