OIA 9096 Tony Randle Email Correspondence Redacted.pdf

From:
Official Correspondence
Sent:
Monday, 29 November 2021 4:43 PM
To:
Out of Scope
Subject:
RE: Information Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of
PT Services
Hi Out of Scope

Yes leave this with us

1982

Out of Scope looks like this is a duplicate of OIA-9096.

Act
Ngā mihi
Out of Sco

Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
twitter | youtube | facebook

Information
From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 29 November 2021 4:04 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: FW: Information Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of PT Services

Good afternoon
Official

We have received this email below.  Is this the type of enquiry official correspondence would answer?  If not,
would you know who I can send this to?

the
Regards

Out of Scope
Senior Customer Response Representative, Customer Response Team
Te Rōpū Waeture | Regulatory Services
under
Email: [email address]
Phone: 0800 108 809
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
twitter | youtube | facebook

Released

1

From: Wellington Commuter <[email address]>
Sent: Saturday, 27 November 2021 12:22 AM
To: [email address]
Subject: Information Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of PT Services

[Note: This official information request is for The Road Efficiency Group that is a partner to Waka Kotahi and is sent
via Waka Kotahi because Local Government New Zealand recommended the best way to communicate with The
Road Efficiency Group was via Waka Kotahi (see below).]
Dear The Road Efficiency Group,
1982
I am interested in the development of the Public Transport Section of the One Network Framework (ONF). I
understand from a previous OIA request to Waka Kotahi (WK) that the initial draft of the ONF was developed by The
Act
Road Efficiency Group and was provided to WK on 1st September 2020: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/Road-Eff...
I would further note that one item of my request to WK was "Can I please have a copy of the communication to the
Road Efficiency Group that led to them to develop the ONF PT Tiers and to provide the ONF movement and place
classification discussion document to WK including the sender of the communication, the date of the
communication and any documents attached/linked to the communication?"
The WK response is: "In developing the One Network Framework (ONF) design, an international review of
movement and place frameworks was completed. As a result, the model layers (including public transport) are
included as an element of a complete movement and place framework and therefore encompassed in the design
Information
document." In addition WK, stated that "The international review of movement and place frameworks you refer to
was completed by a third party" and they did hold this review.
I seek the following information on the development of the Public Transport Section of the ONF by The Road
Efficiency Group.
1) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all international reviews that discuss which PT
Official
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services used to support the development of the ONF?
2) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
the
the ONF that discuss the criteria to be used for assessing if a PT service (bus or rail) is rapid transit?
3) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
the ONF that discuss Metro Rail Lines and why they are all considered to be rapid transit corridors under the ONF?
4) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF reports used to support the statement in
under
the 1 September ONF movement and place classification discussion document that "Buses > 40 services per hour"
are considered rapid transit and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services" ?
5) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "all Metro Rail lines would be classified as PT1 (highest
strategic significance) as they are considered rapid transit corridors irrespective of frequency, availability and or
volume of people movement."
Released
6) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "Buses > 40 services per hour" are considered rapid transit
and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services"
2

Thanks and kind regards,

Ngā mihi,

Sarah McLean
1982
Team Coordinator
Te Kāhui Kaunihera ō Aotearoa
Act

DDI 04 924 1214
E [email address]
W www.lgnz.co.nz

Information
From: Wellington Commuter <[email address]>
Sent: Thursday, 18 November 2021 11:43 PM
To: Information Centre <[email address]>
Subject: Contact for the Road Efficiency Group

Official
Hi
the

I am interested in contacting the Road Efficiency Group which I understand operates under Local Government New
Zealand.
under

Can you please provide me with a contact email address and phone number for the Road Efficiency Group?

Cheers

Released
Tony Randle
4

From:
Out of Scope
Sent:
Monday, 20 December 2021 2:41 PM
To:
Official Correspondence
Subject:
RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 has
been assigned to you
Hi team

Any response from AT or GWRC about this one?
1982

Ngā mihi

Out of Scop
Act

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Information
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 10:56 AM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Official
Subject: RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 has been assigned to you

Sent!
Out of
the

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 10:44 AM
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: FW: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 has been assigned to you

under
Kia ora team

I’ve just spoken to
ab
Out of Scop
out this one.

9) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with Auckland Transport on which PT
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?

10) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with the Greater Wellington
Released
Regional Council on which PT services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?

Can you please email Greater Wellington Regional Council and Auckland Transport and ask if they’re likely to have
any correspondence regarding Public Transport services (bus and rail) being considered rapid transit services, with
other members of the Road Efficiency Group (REG), aside from Waka Kotahi?

1

Apologies for the urgency but we need to know today.

Ngā mihi

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email:Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
1982
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
Act

Out of Scope
Information
Official
the
under
Released

1982
Act
Information
Official
the
under
Released

Kia ora koutou

Just touching base with you regarding the below request made to Waka Kotahi under the Official Information Act
1982.

Could you please confirm if GWRC and AT have any correspondence regarding Public Transport services (bus and
rail) being considered rapid transit services, with other members of the Road Efficiency Group (REG), aside from
Waka Kotahi?

Apologies for the urgency but we need a confirmation back by COP today if possible please.

1982
Ngā mihi
Out of Sco

Act
Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
twitter | youtube | facebook



-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2021 12:21 AM
Information
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of PT Services

Dear The Road Efficiency Group,

[Note: This official information request is for The Road Efficiency Group that is a partner to Waka Kotahi and is sent
Official
via Waka Kotahi because Local Government New Zealand recommended the best way to communicate with The
Road Efficiency Group was via Waka Kotahi.]

I am interested in the development of the Public Transport Section of the One Network Framework (ONF). I
the
understand from a previous OIA request to Waka Kotahi (WK) that the initial draft of the ONF was developed by The
Road Efficiency Group and was provided to WK on 1st September 2020:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nzta.govt.nz%2Fassets%2FRoad-
Efficiency-Group%2Fdocs%2Fonf-movement-and-place-classification-discussion-
document.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ac
under
e0f353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b2898ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=DhhpKEqn
HnyWIrr1Y6Xeg3bj9tX7qjEErrAqM25Xw%2BA%3D&reserved=0

I would further note that one item of my request to WK was "Can I please have a copy of the communication to the
Road Efficiency Group that led to them to develop the ONF PT Tiers and to provide the ONF movement and place
classification discussion document to WK including the sender of the communication, the date of the
communication and any documents attached/linked to the communication?"

Released
The WK response is: "In developing the One Network Framework (ONF) design, an international review of
movement and place frameworks was completed. As a result, the model layers (including public transport) are
included as an element of a complete movement and place framework and therefore encompassed in the design
document." In addition WK, stated that "The international review of movement and place frameworks you refer to
was completed by a third party" and they did hold this review.

2

I seek the following information on the development of the Public Transport Section of the ONF by The Road
Efficiency Group.

1) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all international reviews that discuss which PT
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services used to support the development of the ONF?

2) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
the ONF that discuss the criteria to be used for assessing if a PT service (bus or rail) is rapid transit?

3) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
the ONF that discuss Metro Rail Lines and why they are all considered to be rapid transit corridors under the ONF?

1982
4) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF reports used to support the statement in
the 1 September ONF movement and place classification discussion document that "Buses > 40 services per hour"
are considered rapid transit and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services" ?
Act

5) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "all Metro Rail lines would be classified as PT1 (highest
strategic significance) as they are considered rapid transit corridors irrespective of frequency, availability and or
volume of people movement."

6) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "Buses > 40 services per hour" are considered rapid transit
and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services"

7) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF meeting (or workshop) agendas,
Information
presentations, working papers or background reports where discussions on the criteria to classify rail PT services
under the ONF including if it would be assessed as rapid transit or not ?

8) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF meeting (or workshop) agendas,
presentations, working papers or background reports where discussions on the criteria to classify bus PT services
under the ONF including if it would be assessed as rapid transit or not ?
Official

9) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with Auckland Transport on which
PT services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?

the
10) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with the Greater Wellington
Regional Council on which PT services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?

11) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with Waka Kotahi on which PT
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?
under

If any of the requested information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it be provided in its complete and
original electronic format. It is also preferred that no information is redacted from any provided document because
it is assessed as being irrelevant or out of scope.

Yours faithfully,


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Released

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[email address]

3

Is [email address] the wrong address for Official Information requests to New Zealand
Transport Agency? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffyi.org.nz%2Fchange_request%2Fnew%3Fbo
dy%3Dnzta&data=04%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ace0f
353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b2898ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=zAwL8TTxNC9
Zm6qeB8miQ2kE%2BQbvSIaLsHtD7XEdqBI%3D&reserved=0

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright
policies:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffyi.org.nz%2Fhelp%2Fofficers&data=04
%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ace0f353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b28
1982
98ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAi
LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=xosTVNCJO8bhqmytK2GrWPkpZb2%2Bk
uS9KUWIxz%2FK7Pw%3D&reserved=0
Act

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your
organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.


-------------------------------------------------------------------


This message, together with any attachments, may contain information that is classified and/or subject to legal
privilege. Any classification markings must be adhered to. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
peruse, disclose, disseminate, copy or use the message in any way. If you have received this message in error, please
Information
notify us immediately by return email and then destroy the original message. This communication may be accessed
or retained by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency for information assurance purposes.
ATTENTION: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the
named recipient and receive this correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in
reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Unless otherwise
stated, any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of the
Official
organisation.
the
under
Released
4

From:
Section 9(2)(a)
Sent:
Monday, 20 December 2021 2:29 PM
To:
Section 9(2)(a) ; Democratic Services
Cc:
Section 9(2)(a)
Subject:
Re: URGENT FW: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY
Hi

I can confirm that Regional Tramsport at GWRC did not correspond with REG on the development of the rapid 1982
transit definitions in the ONF.

Section 9(2)(a)
Act

M

m

Section 9(2)(a)

m

m
Kaiwhakahaere Waka-ā-rohe|Manager, Regional Transport
Greater Wel ington Te Pane Matua Taiao
M: Section 9(2)(a)
100 Cuba St, Te Aro, Wellington 6011

Fol ow us online: Facebook | Twitter | gw.govt.nz
Outlook for iOS
From: Section 9(2)(a)
@gw.govt.nz>
Information
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 12:00:09 PM
To: Section 9(2)(a)
@gw.govt.nz>; Democratic Services <[email address]>
Cc: Section 9(2)(a)
@gw.govt.nz>; Section 9(2)(a)
@gw.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: URGENT FW: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY
Hi
Section 9(2)(a)  you may be best placed to respond to this. In Section 9(2)(a) absence, we are not aware of any documents (we
have done a quick search but couldn’t see anything).
Official
Thanks
Section 9(2)(a)
From: Democratic Services <[email address]>
the
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 10:58 am
To: Section 9(2)(a)
@gw.govt.nz>; Section 9(2)(a)
@gw.govt.nz>
Cc: Section 9(2)(a)
@gw.govt.nz>
Subject: URGENT FW: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY
Importance: High
under
Kia ora
Please see the request below.
Ngā mihi
Section 9(2)(a)
From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Rāhina, 20 Hakihea, 2021 10:56 a.m.
To: AT Official Information (AT) <[email address]>; Democratic Services
<[email address]>
Subject: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY
Released
Kia ora koutou
Just touching base with you regarding the below request made to Waka Kotahi under the Official Information Act
1982.
Could you please confirm if GWRC and AT have any correspondence regarding Public Transport services (bus and
rail) being considered rapid transit services, with other members of the Road Efficiency Group (REG), aside from
Waka Kotahi?
1

Apologies for the urgency but we need a confirmation back by COP today if possible please.
Ngā mihi
Out of Sco
Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
twitter | youtube | facebook

-----Original Message-----
From:
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2021 12:21 AM
1982
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of PT Services
Dear The Road Efficiency Group,
Act
[Note: This official information request is for The Road Efficiency Group that is a partner to Waka Kotahi and is sent
via Waka Kotahi because Local Government New Zealand recommended the best way to communicate with The
Road Efficiency Group was via Waka Kotahi.]
I am interested in the development of the Public Transport Section of the One Network Framework (ONF). I
understand from a previous OIA request to Waka Kotahi (WK) that the initial draft of the ONF was developed by The
Road Efficiency Group and was provided to WK on 1st September 2020:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nzta.govt.nz%2Fassets%2FRoad-
Efficiency-Group%2Fdocs%2Fonf-movement-and-place-classification-discussion-
document.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ac
e0f353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b2898ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=DhhpKEqn
Information
HnyWIrr1Y6Xeg3bj9tX7qjEErrAqM25Xw%2BA%3D&reserved=0
I would further note that one item of my request to WK was "Can I please have a copy of the communication to the
Road Efficiency Group that led to them to develop the ONF PT Tiers and to provide the ONF movement and place
classification discussion document to WK including the sender of the communication, the date of the
communication and any documents attached/linked to the communication?"
The WK response is: "In developing the One Network Framework (ONF) design, an international review of
Official
movement and place frameworks was completed. As a result, the model layers (including public transport) are
included as an element of a complete movement and place framework and therefore encompassed in the design
document." In addition WK, stated that "The international review of movement and place frameworks you refer to
was completed by a third party" and they did hold this review.
the
I seek the following information on the development of the Public Transport Section of the ONF by The Road
Efficiency Group.
1) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all international reviews that discuss which PT
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services used to support the development of the ONF?
2) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
under
the ONF that discuss the criteria to be used for assessing if a PT service (bus or rail) is rapid transit?
3) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
the ONF that discuss Metro Rail Lines and why they are all considered to be rapid transit corridors under the ONF?
4) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF reports used to support the statement in
the 1 September ONF movement and place classification discussion document that "Buses > 40 services per hour"
are considered rapid transit and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services" ?
5) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "all Metro Rail lines would be classified as PT1 (highest
strategic significance) as they are considered rapid transit corridors irrespective of frequency, availability and or
Released
volume of people movement."
6) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "Buses > 40 services per hour" are considered rapid transit
and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services"
2

7) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF meeting (or workshop) agendas,
presentations, working papers or background reports where discussions on the criteria to classify rail PT services
under the ONF including if it would be assessed as rapid transit or not ?
8) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF meeting (or workshop) agendas,
presentations, working papers or background reports where discussions on the criteria to classify bus PT services
under the ONF including if it would be assessed as rapid transit or not ?
9) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with Auckland Transport on which
PT services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?
10) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with the Greater Wellington
Regional Council on which PT services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?
11) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with Waka Kotahi on which PT
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?
1982
If any of the requested information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it be provided in its complete and
original electronic format. It is also preferred that no information is redacted from any provided document because
it is assessed as being irrelevant or out of scope.
Act
Yours faithfully,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[email address]
Is [email address] the wrong address for Official Information requests to New Zealand
Transport Agency? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffyi.org.nz%2Fchange_request%2Fnew%3Fbo
dy%3Dnzta&data=04%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ace0f
353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b2898ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=zAwL8TTxNC9
Information
Zm6qeB8miQ2kE%2BQbvSIaLsHtD7XEdqBI%3D&reserved=0
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright
policies:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffyi.org.nz%2Fhelp%2Fofficers&data=04
%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ace0f353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b28
98ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAi
Official
LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=xosTVNCJO8bhqmytK2GrWPkpZb2%2Bk
uS9KUWIxz%2FK7Pw%3D&reserved=0
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your
organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
the
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This message, together with any attachments, may contain information that is classified and/or subject to
legal privilege. Any classification markings must be adhered to. If you are not the intended recipient, you
must not peruse, disclose, disseminate, copy or use the message in any way. If you have received this
message in error, please notify us immediately by return email and then destroy the original message. This
under
communication may be accessed or retained by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency for information
assurance purposes.
Released
3

From:
Out of Scope
Sent:
Monday, 20 December 2021 3:43 PM
To:
Official Correspondence
Subject:
RE: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY CRM:001590003197
Thank you.

I don’t think there will be anything, it was just a last minute thought I had when sending it to
.
Out of Scop

1982
is r
Out of Scope
eviewing now so should be with you shortly.

Ngā mihi
Act

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Information
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 3:07 PM
Official
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: FW: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY CRM:001590003197

the
Hi

Out of Scop

Response from AT below.

Ngā mihi
Out of Sco
under

Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
twitter | youtube | facebook

Released
From: Section 9(2)(a)
@at.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 2:52 PM
To: AT Official Information (AT) <[email address]>; Official Correspondence
<[email address]>
Subject: RE: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY CRM:001590003197

1

Kia ora

Out of Scope
Unfortunately from the staff that I have been able to canvas it appears that we do not hold the
information.  Additionally those staff that may be able to 100% confirm it have already gone on leave and are not
able to be contacted.

I’m sorry that we are not able to help them any further.

Many thanks

Section 9(2)(a

From: AT Official Information (AT) <[email address]>
1982
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 2:30 p.m.
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY CRM:001590003197
Act

Kia ora

Out of Scope

Thank you for contacting Auckland Transport.

Our LGOIMA Team are doing everything to get an answer regarding the below.

Please note that most of ATs subject matter experts are already on leave but we will try to get back to you by COB
today.

Information
Ngā mihi,

Section 9(2)(a)| Customer Care Coordinator

Customer Care – Case Management
Level 4, 20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue, Auckland 1010
Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142
Official
P 09 355 3553 | F 09 355 3550
www.at.govt.nz
the

under


From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 10:56 a.m.
To: AT Official Information (AT) <[email address]>; [email address]
Subject: OIA-9096 INPUT NEEDED TODAY

Kia ora koutou
Released

Just touching base with you regarding the below request made to Waka Kotahi under the Official Information Act
1982.

Could you please confirm if GWRC and AT have any correspondence regarding Public Transport services (bus and
rail) being considered rapid transit services, with other members of the Road Efficiency Group (REG), aside from
2

Waka Kotahi?

Apologies for the urgency but we need a confirmation back by COP today if possible please.

Ngā mihi
Out of Sco

Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
twitter | youtube | facebook

1982

-----Original Message-----
Act
From:
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2021 12:21 AM
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of PT Services

Dear The Road Efficiency Group,

[Note: This official information request is for The Road Efficiency Group that is a partner to Waka Kotahi and is sent
via Waka Kotahi because Local Government New Zealand recommended the best way to communicate with The
Road Efficiency Group was via Waka Kotahi.]
Information

I am interested in the development of the Public Transport Section of the One Network Framework (ONF). I
understand from a previous OIA request to Waka Kotahi (WK) that the initial draft of the ONF was developed by The
Road Efficiency Group and was provided to WK on 1st September 2020:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nzta.govt.nz%2Fassets%2FRoad-
Efficiency-Group%2Fdocs%2Fonf-movement-and-place-classification-discussion-
document.pdf&data=04%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ac
Official
e0f353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b2898ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=DhhpKEqn
HnyWIrr1Y6Xeg3bj9tX7qjEErrAqM25Xw%2BA%3D&reserved=0
the

I would further note that one item of my request to WK was "Can I please have a copy of the communication to the
Road Efficiency Group that led to them to develop the ONF PT Tiers and to provide the ONF movement and place
classification discussion document to WK including the sender of the communication, the date of the
communication and any documents attached/linked to the communication?"
under

The WK response is: "In developing the One Network Framework (ONF) design, an international review of
movement and place frameworks was completed. As a result, the model layers (including public transport) are
included as an element of a complete movement and place framework and therefore encompassed in the design
document." In addition WK, stated that "The international review of movement and place frameworks you refer to
was completed by a third party" and they did hold this review.

I seek the following information on the development of the Public Transport Section of the ONF by The Road
Efficiency Group.
Released

1) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all international reviews that discuss which PT
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services used to support the development of the ONF?

2) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
the ONF that discuss the criteria to be used for assessing if a PT service (bus or rail) is rapid transit?
3

3) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all reports used to support the development of
the ONF that discuss Metro Rail Lines and why they are all considered to be rapid transit corridors under the ONF?

4) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF reports used to support the statement in
the 1 September ONF movement and place classification discussion document that "Buses > 40 services per hour"
are considered rapid transit and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services" ?

5) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "all Metro Rail lines would be classified as PT1 (highest
strategic significance) as they are considered rapid transit corridors irrespective of frequency, availability and or
volume of people movement."
1982

6) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF presentations, working papers or
background reports used to support the definition that "Buses > 40 services per hour" are considered rapid transit
Act
and bus services ">12 bus services per hour" are only considered PT2 "Spine Services"

7) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF meeting (or workshop) agendas,
presentations, working papers or background reports where discussions on the criteria to classify rail PT services
under the ONF including if it would be assessed as rapid transit or not ?

8) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any and all ONF meeting (or workshop) agendas,
presentations, working papers or background reports where discussions on the criteria to classify bus PT services
under the ONF including if it would be assessed as rapid transit or not ?

9) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with Auckland Transport on which
Information
PT services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?

10) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with the Greater Wellington
Regional Council on which PT services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?

11) Can The Road Efficiency Group please provide a copy of any correspondence with Waka Kotahi on which PT
Official
services (bus and rail) would be considered rapid transit services?

If any of the requested information is held in electronic form, it is preferred that it be provided in its complete and
original electronic format. It is also preferred that no information is redacted from any provided document because
the
it is assessed as being irrelevant or out of scope.

Yours faithfully,

under
-------------------------------------------------------------------

This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[email address]

Is [email address] the wrong address for Official Information requests to New Zealand
Transport Agency? If so, please contact us using this form:
Released
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffyi.org.nz%2Fchange_request%2Fnew%3Fbo
dy%3Dnzta&data=04%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ace0f
353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b2898ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d
8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=zAwL8TTxNC9
Zm6qeB8miQ2kE%2BQbvSIaLsHtD7XEdqBI%3D&reserved=0

4

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright
policies:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffyi.org.nz%2Fhelp%2Fofficers&data=04
%7C01%7Cofficial.correspondence%40nzta.govt.nz%7C5ba739d35f3d4481842f08d9ace0f353%7C7245e48ca9ff4b28
98ef05cfa8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637730905168069690%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAi
LCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=xosTVNCJO8bhqmytK2GrWPkpZb2%2Bk
uS9KUWIxz%2FK7Pw%3D&reserved=0

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your
organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

1982
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Act
This message, together with any attachments, may contain information that is classified and/or subject to legal
privilege. Any classification markings must be adhered to. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not
peruse, disclose, disseminate, copy or use the message in any way. If you have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately by return email and then destroy the original message. This communication may be accessed
or retained by Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency for information assurance purposes.
Important notice: The contents of this email and any attachments may be confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you have received this email
message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments; any use, disclosure or copying of this
message or attachments is prohibited. Any views expressed in this email may be those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the
views of Auckland Transport.
Information
Official
the
under
Released
5

From:
Vanessa Browne
Sent:
Monday, 20 December 2021 1:49 PM
To:
Out of Scope
Subject:
RE: For Approval - OIA-9096 - Tony Randle - Due 20 December 2021
Yes that’s great thanks

Out of Scope

1982

Vanessa Browne
Act
National Manager, Programme and Standards
Transport Services
Email: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz
Phone: Out of Scope

Mobile: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Majestic Centre, Level 7, 100 Wil is Street
PO Box 5084, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
Information

twitter | youtube | facebook

Official

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 1:33 pm
the
To: Vanessa Browne Out of Scope @nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: For Approval - OIA-9096 - Tony Randle - Due 20 December 2021

Thanks Vanessa, I don’t think it would hurt.

under
I’ve updated the draft to say:

As a member of the Road Efficiency Group (REG), Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency considers any information held
by the REG to also be information held by itself. Therefore, I can confirm that all documents falling within scope of
your request, unless already publicly available, were provided to you by Waka Kotahi on 19 July 2021, under
reference OIA-8243.

Ngā mihi
Released

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
1

Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

From: Vanessa Browne Out of Scope @nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 12:16 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
1982
Subject: RE: For Approval - OIA-9096 - Tony Randle - Due 20 December 2021

Thanks

Out of Scope

Act
That is fine. Do you think we should make a connecting statement to show that Waka Kotahi is part of the Road
Efficiency Group and that is why we are aware that the documents requested are the same as previously supplied?

Vanessa Browne
National Manager, Programme and Standards
Information
Transport Services
Email: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz
Phone: Out of Scope

Mobile: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Official
Majestic Centre, Level 7, 100 Wil is Street
PO Box 5084, Wellington 6140, New Zealand
the

twitter | youtube | facebook

under

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 11:24 am
To: Vanessa Browne Out of Scope @nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: For Approval - OIA-9096 - Tony Randle - Due 20 December 2021
Importance: High

Hi Vanessa
Released

Apologies for the urgency with this one, would you be able to review this OIA response?

We received a similar request from Mr Randle in June of this year which we have provided all documents in scope of
the request. He has now made essentially the same request, but has directed it to the REG instead of Waka Kotahi.
I’ve spoken with Out of Scope  who has confirmed all documents in scope of the request were provided to him
2

previously as part of the last OIA (attached). Your name is on the response but reading the memo, it looks like
Out of Scope
approved this as acting National Manager, Programme and Standards.
Summary of the Request

Requestor: Tony Randle

Subject: One Network Framework

Due date: 20 December 2021

Approved by: Out of Scope (Out of Scope
– previous response)

SME(s): Out of Scope
Ngā mihi
Out of Scop
Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Friday, 3 December 2021 9:51 AM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 - Draft due 29 November 2021
Hi Out of Scop
As per telecon, I am of the opinion that the Waka Kotahi team have provided all the information available to Tony
Randle previously, and that this request is as stated, a copy of a similar request addressed to Waka Kotahi.
Out of Scope
Out of Scope
under the Official Information Act 1982
DDI Out of Scope / M Out of Scope
From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2021 4:13 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; KOut of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 - Draft due 29 November 2021
Released
Hi Out of Scope
I spoke to Out of Scope about the request as his other recent ones. We’re confident we’ve already provided everything in
scope but Out of Scope suggested I double check with you to make sure nothing has been missed.
3

It looks like he’s trying a different avenue by directing the request to REG, rather than to Waka Kotahi thinking he’ll
get a different response.

Ngā mihi

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
1982
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Act
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2021 10:14 AM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; SaOut of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 - Draft due 29 November 2021

Information
Hi
–
Out of Scop
Out of Scope has been dealing with Tony Randle’s requests, of which we have had number,  the latest a
fortnight back.

Note he has also reached out to LGNZ.

Out of Scope
Official

Out of Scope
DDI Out of Scope / M Out of Scope
the

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November 2021 10:10 AM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
under
Subject: RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 - Draft due 29 November 2021

Good morning all

I’ve had a look over our previous requests, we’ve had a few from Mr Randle.

This latest request is nearly identical to the one we received form him in June 2021, OIA-8243:
https://infohub.nzta.govt.nz/otcs/cs.dll?func=ll&objId=49862419&objAction=viewheader.

Released
We have also had a couple of follow ups from him: OIA-8775 -
https://infohub.nzta.govt.nz/otcs/cs.dll?func=ll&objId=50599164&objAction=viewheader, and OIA-8939 -
https://infohub.nzta.govt.nz/otcs/cs.dll?func=ll&objId=50918547&objAction=viewheader.

Looking at these, it appears we’ve already provided him with everything in scope of the request. Out of Scope
are you be able to do a quick to make sure that there is nothing we’ve missed?
4

Ngā mihi

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
1982
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

Act

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2021 4:14 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 - Draft due 29 November 2021

Hi

Out of Scope

I am aware that similar OIA’s have come in previously in relation to this – probably from the same person – so please
Information
do check your files to see what’s on hand. Out of Scope  who I have added to this email was involved in leading
the ONF development, this process and received the previous related OIAs.

Section 9(2)(g)(i)

Official

I was involved in a first iteration of the development of the definitions. In that iteration we did not have the PT1
class identified as ‘Rapid’ which seems to be his key area o interest. I think we called PT1 ‘dedicated’ (but can check).
the
The terminology was later changed to align with other strategic government documents (NPS-UD) and that process
was initiated and led by Out of Scope who has since left the Agency. I’m happy to share what I have on file. For the
early work I was involved with we largely developed the skeleton tiers based on SME collaboration and looking at
documents like AT’s RPTP PT service classification so there may not be too much of interest on file. Out of Scope
and I did co-deliver one presentation to REG or TSIG though to get feedback, but again this was before ‘rapid’ was
introduced and I believe him and

Out of Scop presented again to propose/explain that.
under

I think in any response provided it needs to be made very clear that the ONF classifications available are DRAFT only
and the service frequencies shown are INDICATIVE. If the requester has some feedback on the draft tiers, I’m sure
the ONF team would warmly welcome the feedback.

Section 9(2)(g)(i)

Thank you,

Released
Out of Scope

Principal Multi-Modal Advisor, Safe & Sustainable Standards
Programme & Standards, Transport Services
Email: Out of Scope @nzta.govt.nz
5

Mobile: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2021 2:14 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: FW: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 - Draft due 29 November
2021

Hi

Out of Scop
1982

I wasn’t involved with the ONF classification for PT services, however hopefully Out of Scope will be able to help with
this.  I’ve also copied in Out of Scope who I think was involved with some of the initial technical work relating to PT and
Act
may have further insight on best person to coordinate.

Cheers
Out of Scope

Out of Scope

Principal Advisor, Public Transport
Transport Services
Email: Out of Scope @nzta.govt.nz
Information
Phone: Out of Scope
Mobile: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency

From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>   Official
Sent: Monday, 22 November 2021 1:52 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: FW: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 - Draft due 29 November
the
2021

Hi Out of Scope

One of our coordinators suggested you might be able to assist with the attached OIA request we’ve received
regarding the ONF Classification of PT Services.
under

This looks like it could work out to require a substantial amount of work to put together. If there are any parts of the
request which you think need to be refined, please let me know and I’ll get in touch with the requestor.

Ngā mihi

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Released
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
6

Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

Out of Scope
1982
Act
Information
Official
the
under
Released

From:
Out of Scope
Sent:
Monday, 20 December 2021 3:29 PM
To:
Out of Scope
Subject:
FW: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 has
been assigned to you
Attachments:
Official Information request - Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF
Classification of PT Services.msg
Hey

Out of Scop
1982

I’ve made the changes as discussed.

Ngā mihi
Act

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Information
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Official
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 2:58 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Cc: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
the
Subject: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 has been assigned to you

Hi Out of Scope  under
This is a automated email from the Ministerials Coordination team. The following task has been assigned to you to
action.
Due Today - Hi
,
Out of Scop  can you please review this OIA response? Haven't heard back from AT/GWRC on the two parts
we discussed this morning. Do you think we should extend to consult?
Summary of the Request
  Reference Number: OIA-9096
Released
  Type of Request: OIA - Official Information Act
  From: Tony Randle
  Subject: Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of PT Services
  Infohub Link: Open
  Draft Due Date: 2021-11-29
  Advisor: Out of Scope
1

From:
Out of Scope
Sent:
Monday, 20 December 2021 3:58 PM
To:
Out of Scope
Subject:
RE: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 has
been assigned to you
Happy with this. Could you drop in a paragraph to the memo explaining how we considered whether
correspondence from members of the REG to AT or GWRC would be in scope of those two questions, and
approached GW and AT about it, but ultimately decided that such correspondence, if it existed, would be out of
1982
scope.

And assign this to me to approve so I can tick that box.
Act

Cheers

Out of Scop

From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 2:58 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Cc: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>; Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: Ministerial Request (OIA - Official Information Act) Ref number OIA-9096 has been assigned to you

Information
Hi Out of Scope
This is a automated email from the Ministerials Coordination team. The following task has been assigned to you to
action.
Official
Due Today - Hi
,
Out of Scop  can you please review this OIA response? Haven't heard back from AT/GWRC on the two parts
we discussed this morning. Do you think we should extend to consult?
the
Summary of the Request
  Reference Number: OIA-9096
  Type of Request: OIA - Official Information Act
  From: Tony Randle
  Subject: Request to The Road Efficiency Group on the ONF Classification of PT Services
under
  Infohub Link: Open
  Draft Due Date: 2021-11-29
  Advisor: Out of Scope
View the request
Released
1

From:
Official Correspondence
Sent:
Monday, 20 December 2021 4:33 PM
To:
Out of Scope
Cc:
Out of Scope
Subject:
OIA-9096 APPROVED
Hi there,
1982
Out of Scope has approved your task
Comments from Manager:
Business Group coordinators please update the request status to "MS ADVISOR REVIEW"
Act
Information
Official
the
under
Released
1

From:
Out of Scope
Sent:
Wednesday, 12 January 2022 12:45 PM
To:
Official Correspondence
Subject:
RE: OIA-9096 RESPONSE
Hi team

Apologies for the delay getting back to you.

1982
Yes, still working on an email response. Just need the SME to fact check.

Ngā mihi
Act

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Senior Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: Out of Scope
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

Information

-----Original Message-----
From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Monday, 10 January 2022 1:59 PM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: OIA-9096 RESPONSE
Official

Hi

Out of Scop

the
Is the email response still being worked on?

Ngā mihi
Out of Sco

Ministerial Services
under
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency twitter | youtube | facebook

-----Original Message-----
From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Thursday, 23 December 2021 9:19 AM
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: RE: OIA-9096 RESPONSE

Hey

Out of Scop
Released

Yes checked with
,
Out of Scop  he said an email response is fine - No need for an NZT or another OIA.

Just need to run it past my SME, will hopefully hear back before Christmas.

Ngā mihi
1

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone: +64 6 826 4565
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

1982
-----Original Message-----
From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Thursday, 23 December 2021 9:18 AM
Act
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: RE: OIA-9096 RESPONSE

Hi

Out of Scope

Any update on the below?

Regards,

Out of Scop

Ministerial Services
Information
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency twitter | youtube | facebook

Official
-----Original Message-----
From: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 December 2021 10:29 am
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
the
Subject: RE: OIA-9096 RESPONSE

Morning Out of Scope

I'll check with
about
Out of Scop
this one shortly. I'm not sure.
under

Ngā mihi

Out of Scop

Out of Scope
Advisor, Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships
Email: Out of [email address]
Phone:Out of Scope
Released
Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency
Palmerston North
Private Bag 11777, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand

-----Original Message-----
2

From: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Sent: Tuesday, 21 December 2021 8:28 AM
To: Out of Scope
@nzta.govt.nz>
Subject: FW: OIA-9096 RESPONSE

Morning

Out of Scope

Please see the below response from Tony Randle in reply to OIA-9096.

Shall we log this as an NZT to answer whether it has gone to the Road efficiency group and what happened to the
[email address] request?

1982
Thanks

Out of Scope

Act
Portfolio Coordinator, Ministerial Services Te Waka Kotuia | Engagement & Partnerships

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Randle <[email address]>
Sent: Monday, 20 December 2021 10:59 PM
To: Official Correspondence <[email address]>
Subject: Re: OIA-9096 RESPONSE

Dear Official Correspondence,

With all due respect to Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency, this information request was NOT addressed to you.
Information

Local Government New Zealand stated, in writing, that to contact The Road Efficiency Group I must send it via Waka
Kotahi . For this reason, this information request is addressed:

"Dear The Road Efficiency Group,

Official
[Note: This official information request is for The Road Efficiency Group that is a partner to Waka Kotahi and is sent
via Waka Kotahi because Local Government New Zealand recommended the best way to communicate with The
Road Efficiency Group was via Waka Kotahi.] ..."

the
I also sent this request via email to [email address] but have not had any response via that channel either.

Can Waka Kotahi please confirm you have passed on this to The Road Efficiency Group as requested or provide me
with a contact email by which I can contact them directly?

under
Yours sincerely,

Tony Randle

-----Original Message-----

Dear Tony,


Released

Please find attached the response to your request of 22^nd November 2021 for information under the Official
Information Act 1982.



3

Regards



Ministerial Services
Te Waka Kōtuia | Engagement & Partnerships Waka Kotahi NZ Transport Agency

[1]twitter | [2]youtube | [3]facebook



[4][IMG]
1982



Act




-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[email address]

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright
policies:
https://aus01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffyi.org.nz%2Fhelp%2Fofficers&data=04
Information
%7C01%7CSam.Russell%40nzta.govt.nz%7C1ae9364555874c7491c508d9d3d46987%7C7245e48ca9ff4b2898ef05cfa
8edb518%7C0%7C0%7C637773731524530031%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2
luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=iyVyzwBY9F21bcoOM4Jf6%2FruR8UcqcLhPtV7s2fs
3cc%3D&reserved=0

If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your
Official
organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

the
under
Released
4