Complainants' Interviews

Ross Francis made this Official Information request to New Zealand Police

The request was refused by New Zealand Police.

From: Ross Francis

Dear New Zealand Police,

I have the following information request.

In November 1997, former Detective Colin Eade told reporter Melanie Reid that there were ”more than ten offenders” in the Christchurch Civic Creche (Peter Ellis) case. Exactly how many suspected offenders did Police identify and how many of these were female?

Were any of the 20 child complainants given diagnostic interviews? If so, how many of the child complainants underwent such interviews?

How many formal evidential interviews did each of the complainants undergo?

Yours faithfully,

Ross Francis

Link to this

Ross Francis left an annotation ()

This is a reminder that this request is overdue.

Link to this

From: WRIGHT-MCCARTHY, Hannah
New Zealand Police


Attachment image001.png
10K Download


Dear Mr Francis,

 

I refer to your Official Information request of 12 September 2018,
received by Police:

 

“In November 1997, former Detective Colin Eade told reporter Melanie Reid
that there were ”more than ten offenders” in the Christchurch Civic Crèche
(Peter Ellis) case.

Exactly how many suspected offenders did Police identify and how many of
these were female? Were any of the 20 child complainants given diagnostic
interviews?

If so, how many of the child complainants underwent such interviews? How
many formal evidential interviews did each of the complainants undergo?”

 

We apologize for the delay in processing your request-it was missed due to
administrative error.

 

Your request is being actioned pursuant to the Official Information Act
1982.

 

Kind Regards,

 

Hannah Wright-McCarthy

Ministerial Services Officer

Ministerial Services

E [1][email address]

 

[2]wordmark transparent

 

===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.

Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

New Zealand Police


Attachment Response.pdf
17K Download View as HTML


Afternoon Ross,
 
Please see the attached letter in relation to your latest request.
 
Kind regards,
 
Rachel
 

Canterbury OIA Team Leader | File Management Centre | Canterbury District
| New Zealand Police
Canterbury District Headquarters, 40 Lichfield Street, Christchurch
Central, DX WX 10057, Christchurch 8022

Safer Communities Together

===============================================================

WARNING

The information contained in this email message is intended for the
addressee only and may contain privileged information. It may also be
subject to the provisions of section 50 of the Policing Act 2008, which
creates an offence to have unlawful possession of Police property. If you
are not the intended recipient of this message or have received this
message in error, you must not peruse, use, distribute or copy this
message or any of its contents.

Also note, the views expressed in this message may not necessarily reflect
those of the New Zealand Police. If you have received this message in
error, please email or telephone the sender immediately

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
New Zealand Police only: