20 February 2026
Ref: DOIA-REQ-0025972-Sam Brown
Sam Brown
Email: [FYI request #33444 email]
Tēnā koe Sam
Thank you for your email of 6 January 2026 to the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment
(MBIE) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), the fol owing information:
1. Any analysis of economic or resilience implications if terrestrial telecommunications
infrastructure in rural areas is abandoned due to market dynamics, including assessment of
whether such infrastructure can be economically rebuilt if subsequently needed.
2. Any advice regarding whether maintaining multiple technology platforms (terrestrial and
satel ite) serves resilience, redundancy, or strategic interests, versus consolidating on single
satellite-based approach.
3. Any assessment of "path dependency" risks where short-term policy decisions create
irreversible market structure changes that constrain future options or create long-term
consumer harm.
4. Any advice to Ministers on whether government should actively preserve infrastructure
diversity in essential services markets, or whether allowing market concentration through
competitive dynamics is acceptable for telecommunications.
5. Any analysis of whether terrestrial infrastructure, once economically abandoned, represents
permanently lost optionality for:
•
Future competition if satel ite pricing rises;
•
Redundancy during satel ite service disruptions;
•
Data sovereignty and local routing of internet traffic; and
•
Regional economic development and local employment.
On 22 January 2026, you clarified that the time period for this request is 1 January 2022 to 6 January
2026. On 27 January 2026, you were advised that the date for replying to your request had been reset to
20 February 2026. This was done under section 15(1AA) of the Act.
I am refusing your request under section 18(e) of the Act as the documents al eged to contain the
information requested do not exist or, despite reasonable efforts to locate them, cannot be found.
I can advise that MBIE does not hold any direct analysis of the economic or resilience implications if
terrestrial telecommunications infrastructure in rural areas are abandoned (Question 1), or of whether
terrestrial telecommunications infrastructure, once economically abandoned, represent lost optionality
(Question 5).
I can further advise that MBIE has not provided any advice on maintaining multiple technology platforms
versus a single satellite-based approach (Question 2), or on preserving infrastructure diversity versus
al owing market concentration (Question 4). Additional y, I can advise that MBIE has not undertaken a
‘path-dependency’ assessment (Question 3).
If you wish to discuss any aspect of your request or this response, or if you require any further assistance,
please contact
[email address].
You have the right to seek an investigation and review by the Ombudsman of this decision. Information
about how to make a complaint is available at www.ombudsman.parliament.nz or freephone 0800 802
602.
Nāku noa, nā
Deborah Crawford
Manager, Communications Policy