2 December 2025
By email: [FYI request #32768 email]
Tēnā koe AC
I refer to your information request dated 6 November 2025 made under the Official Information Act
1982 (the Act):
Does the University still produce grade comparison reports (as described in this critic article)?
https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.critic.co.nz%2Ffea
tures%2Farticle%2F1342%2Fnot-all-papers-created-
equal&data=05%7C02%7Coia%40otago.ac.nz%7C1f847bd65fcf4306d49508de1d012f10%7
C0225efc578fe4928b1579ef24809e9ba%7C0%7C0%7C638980088226187427%7CUnkno
wn%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4z
MiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=N%2BA5M%2FL3
qL%2B5rNiarF3%2F43XWcbdoG2wgw%2B%2Fugq1MEUs%3D&reserved=0
Can the reports referred to in this article, or more recent ones if they exist, be disclosed?
Our response to your request follows.
Anonymised statistical academic results data for papers offered by the University of Otago are
published on our website: https://www.otago.ac.nz/about/quickstats. We do this so that all students
can access this information at any time. The data excludes information we would withhold under
section 9(2)(a) of the Act, to protect the privacy and wellbeing of students.
The published spreadsheet indicates the number of students who achieved a particular grade or
percentage mark for semester 1, semester 2, full year and summer school papers for each year from
2019 to 2024, and summer school and semester 1 papers for 2025. Further information on the
University’s
Proactive Release Policy for Academic Results is available here:
https://www.otago.ac.nz/administration/policies/policy-collection/proactive-release-policy-for-
academic-results
The
Critic article referenced in your request, dated 22 August 2011, notes that the last grade
comparison reports were circulated in 2008. As this information is more than ten years old, the
University has no obligation to retain it under the Public Records Act 2005. Obtaining this information,
if it exists, would also involve substantial research and collation, and neither extending the time limit
nor determining a charge would enable the request to be reasonably met. Accordingly, we decline this
part of your request under section 18(f) of the Act.
We hope the information we have provided is helpful.
Office of the Registrar and Secretary to the Council | Te Tari o Te Pouroki me te Kaituhi ki te Kaunihera
PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
[University of Otago request email]
otago.ac.nz
If you are not satisfied with our response to your information request, section 28(3) of the Act provides
you with the right to ask an Ombudsman to investigate and review this response. However, we would
welcome the opportunity to discuss any concerns with you first.
Ngā mihi
Bill Frewen
Manager Policy and Compliance