Out of Scope
8/20/2025 2:31 AM
{"messageType":5,"body":{"user":"human","message":"can you please create a high-level summary of the selected part and remove any agency
names","disableLinksProcessing":true,"shouldApplyInputLinkTheme":true,"commandText":"can you please create a high-level summary of the
selected part and remove any agency names","hydratedEntities":[]},"feedbackData":{"feedbackArea":"Copilot","contextData":{"cardMetaData":"
{\"prompt\":\"can you please create a high-level summary of the selected part and remove any agency names\",\"promptId\":\"bc2eec01-bf87-
4c9d-9728-3162593df622\",\"enabledPlugins\":[\"BingWebSearch\",\"EnterpriseSearch\"]}","sydneyContextData":
{"conversationId":"","sydneyEndpoint":"https://substrate.office.com/m365chat/SecuredChatHub","requestId":"bc2eec01-bf87-4c9d-9728-
3162593df622","utteranceTimeStamp":"2025-08-20T02:30:52.992Z","locale":"en-us"},"feedbackContextData":{"prompt":"can you please create a
high-level summary of the selected part and remove any agency names","promptId":"bc2eec01-bf87-4c9d-9728-
3162593df622"},"groundingSource":"CurrentContext+Web","entryPoint":"Chat","enabledPlugins":
[{"id":"BingWebSearch","source":"BuiltIn"}]}},"shouldShowAIGeneratedIndicator":false,"feedbackSectionPosition":"None","showMinifiedUI":false,"showAni
{\"correlationId\":\"8c090bca-b255-4a77-830c-db5276c2e793\"}","messageId":"b00f8755-d4d9-4ac2-9821-
1d7f8ff5b27b","shouldShowCopyButton":false,"shouldShowHandoffButton":false,"shouldShowReadAloudButton":false,"overrideDirection":"ltr"}
can you please create a high-level summary of the selected part and remove any agency names
Out of Scope
8/20/2025 2:31 AM
can you please create a high-level summary of the selected part and remove any agency names
Copilot in Word 8/20/2025 2:31 AM
{"messageType":5,"body":{"user":"chat","message":"Sure! Here's a high-level summary of the selected part without any agency names:\n\n---
\n\n**Feedback Summary and Actions:**\n\n1. **General Feedback:**\n - No edits were suggested for some documents.\n - Changes were
recommended to reflect the Copyright Review and to track employment and effects of AI on the Creative Sector.\n - Figures for certain policies
were updated.\n - Specific edits were requested regarding R&D, and these were added directly into the document.\n - Questions were raised
about the focus on healthcare as an opportunity and the need for a broader discussion on risk appetite and stance.\n - Emphasis was placed on
exploring cross-agency collaboration, particularly in data sharing and leverage.\n - The strategy should include a people lens, highlighting that
technology delivers efficiency, but culture drives productivity.\n\n2. **Privacy and Trust:**\n - The interplay between AI and privacy was
highlighted, with suggestions to strengthen documents by referencing privacy implications and guidance.\n - Trust in AI among New Zealanders
is low, with concerns about the malicious use of AI and lack of regulation.\n - Public trust needs to grow before embedding AI in the Public
Service.\n\n3. **Support and Strategy:**\n - Overall support for the strategy was expressed, but it was noted that it is not ambitious enough.\n -
The strategy would benefit from more discussion on challenges to AI uptake and improved alignment with other reforms.\n - Additional AI case
studies and clarification on next steps were recommended.\n - The importance of targeted external consultation with technology companies and
public service agencies was emphasized.\n\n4. **Guidance and Training:**\n - Recommendations were made to refer to foundational elements
for supporting the policy environment.\n - Public Service AI Training should be included as a key capability.\n - The strategy should commit to a
strong data foundation and periodic review cycles.\n\n5. **Population and Climate Implications:**\n - Population implications for specific groups
and climate impacts of AI adoption were highlighted.\n - International cooperation and contributions to AI use in data production were
suggested.\n\n6. **Regulatory and Financial Considerations:**\n - Financial implications and regulatory impact assessments were discussed.\n -
The need for clearer guidance on supporting the public service in relation to AI was emphasized.\n - Questions were raised about safeguards to
prevent AI-related harms and the protection of intellectual property and data.\n\n7. **Ethical and Social Considerations:**\n - The strategy
should address ethical considerations and the potential social and civil opportunities and challenges of AI.\n - A coordinated harm-reduction
approach was recommended to prevent AI-related harm.\n - The environmental impact of AI solutions and Māori Data Sovereignty were also
highlighted.\n\n8. **Implementation and Success Indicators:**\n - The strategy should include clear objectives, measurable outcomes, and
actions linked to these objectives.\n - Success indicators and key performance indicators are essential for tracking progress and building public
confidence.\n\n---\n\nI hope this summary is helpful! If you need any further details or adjustments, please let me know.
😊","allowImages":false,"enableLinkDataDownload":false,"disableLinksProcessing":false},"feedbackData":{"feedbackArea":"Copilot","contextData":
{"cardMetaData":"{\"prompt\":\"can you please create a high-level summary of the selected part and remove any agency
names\",\"promptId\":\"8c090bca-b255-4a77-830c-db5276c2e793\",\"enabledPlugins\":
[\"BingWebSearch\",\"EnterpriseSearch\"]}","feedbackContextData":{"prompt":"can you please create a high-level summary of the selected part
and remove any agency names","promptId":"8c090bca-b255-4a77-830c-db5276c2e793","interactionId":"93111f20-a28f-46a2-922e-
759e060352d8"},"featureName":"Chat QnA","entryPoint":"Chat","feedbackClientAppName":"WordWin32CopilotOCV","sydneyContextData":
{"conversationId":"8d0ed8c5-7cb5-43fe-bcbd-
1e3e360a61cc","sydneyEndpoint":"https://substrate.office.com/m365Copilot/ChatHub","requestId":"8c090bca-b255-4a77-830c-
db5276c2e793","utteranceTimeStamp":"2025-08-20T02:31:06.623Z","feedbackMessageId":"93111f20-a28f-46a2-922e-
759e060352d8","locale":"en-US"},"groundingSource":"CurrentContext+Web","enabledPlugins":
[{"id":"BingWebSearch","source":"BuiltIn"}]}},"shouldShowAIGeneratedIndicator":true,"feedbackSectionPosition":"Footer","showAnimation":true,"clpSensit
{"labelId":"738466f7-346c-47bb-a4d2-4a6558d61975","iconType":"NonEncryption","tooltipText":"UNCLASSIFIED is when the compromise of
information does not have the potential to cause harm or breach a person's privacy.","badgeText":"UNCLASSIFIED"},"telemetryData":"
{\"featureName\":\"Chat QnA\",\"correlationId\":\"8c090bca-b255-4a77-830c-db5276c2e793\"}","messageId":"203959c7-ecfa-4ebd-a95b-
40a3fce22c1a","messageAttributionProps":{"promptId":"8c090bca-b255-4a77-830c-
db5276c2e793"},"shouldShowCopyButton":false,"shouldShowHandoffButton":false,"shouldShowReadAloudButton":false,"chatCardIndex":1,"overrideDire
Sure! Here's a high-level summary of the selected part without any agency names: --- **Feedback Summary and Actions:** 1. **General
Feedback:** - No edits were suggested for some documents. - Changes were recommended to reflect the Copyright Review and to track
employment and effects of AI on the Creative Sector. - Figures for certain policies were updated. - Specific edits were requested regarding R&D,
and these were added directly into the document. - Questions were raised about the focus on healthcare as an opportunity and the need for a
broader discussion on risk appetite and stance. - Emphasis was placed on exploring cross-agency collaboration, particularly in data sharing and
leverage. - The strategy should include a people lens, highlighting that technology delivers efficiency, but culture drives productivity. 2. **Privacy
and Trust:** - The interplay between AI and privacy was highlighted, with suggestions to strengthen documents by referencing privacy
implications and guidance. - Trust in AI among New Zealanders is low, with concerns about the malicious use of AI and lack of regulation. -
Public trust needs to grow before embedding AI in the Public Service. 3. **Support and Strategy:** - Overall support for the strategy was
expressed, but it was noted that it is not ambitious enough. - The strategy would benefit from more discussion on challenges to AI uptake and
improved alignment with other reforms. - Additional AI case studies and clarification on next steps were recommended. - The importance of
targeted external consultation with technology companies and public service agencies was emphasized. 4. **Guidance and Training:** -
Recommendations were made to refer to foundational elements for supporting the policy environment. - Public Service AI Training should be
included as a key capability. - The strategy should commit to a strong data foundation and periodic review cycles. 5. **Population and Climate
Implications:** - Population implications for specific groups and climate impacts of AI adoption were highlighted. - International cooperation and
contributions to AI use in data production were suggested. 6. **Regulatory and Financial Considerations:** - Financial implications and regulatory
impact assessments were discussed. - The need for clearer guidance on supporting the public service in relation to AI was emphasized. -
Questions were raised about safeguards to prevent AI-related harms and the protection of intellectual property and data. 7. **Ethical and Social
Considerations:** - The strategy should address ethical considerations and the potential social and civil opportunities and challenges of AI. - A
coordinated harm-reduction approach was recommended to prevent AI-related harm. - The environmental impact of AI solutions and Māori
Data Sovereignty were also highlighted. 8. **Implementation and Success Indicators:** - The strategy should include clear objectives, measurable
outcomes, and actions linked to these objectives. - Success indicators and key performance indicators are essential for tracking progress and
building public confidence. --- I hope this summary is helpful! If you need any further details or adjustments, please let me know. 😊
