Refer to Legal Services for external counsel v15.0
Outputs
1982
4.0
Manage ongoing correspondence
Act
Attend
Linked Process
Prepare and Case Conference (CC)
Task
Linked Process
Create Bulk Print and Send CIR
Information
3.0
Book Case Conference
Official
2.0
Refer to Legal Services
the
1.0
Consider Legal Services Representation
under
Linked Process
Complete Background Review
Released
Review Specialist
ACC > Customer Insights and Comms > Manage Customer Reviews and Disputes > Manage Customer Reviews > Refer to Legal Services for external counsel
Uncontrolled Copy Only : Version 15.0 : Last Edited Thursday, 19 October 2023 4:59 pm : Printed Tuesday, 2 July 2024 11:16 am
Page 1 of 4
Refer to Legal Services for external counsel v15.0
Summary
Objective
This process will guide a Review Specialist on when and how to engage in Legal Representation as part of the review process.
Background
.
Outside of Scope
Owner
Expert
1982
Procedure
PROCESS
Complete Background Review
Review Specialist
Act
1.0 Consider Legal Services Representation
Review Specialist
a Check if the review should be referred to Legal Services.
NOTE Consideration factors are used to determine whether a review may be more appropriately managed by Exter-
nal Counsel. The consideration factors are not exhaustive, and the Review Specialist must have regard to the
surrounding factors of a review, especially the available resources to them in Resolution Services to support
them in managing difficult reviews, and the perception of referring a claim for External Counsel management.
Information
Official
the
under
Released
ACC > Customer Insights and Comms > Manage Customer Reviews and Disputes > Manage Customer Reviews > Refer to Legal Services for external counsel
Uncontrolled Copy Only : Version 15.0 : Last Edited Thursday, 19 October 2023 4:59 pm : Printed Tuesday, 2 July 2024 11:16 am
Page 2 of 4
NOTE What are the consideration factors?
The consideration factors are:
1) Is there a strategic reason for a referral to External Counsel?
• Is the topic one that ACC is currently litigating through the Courts?
• Does our argument need to be run in line with arguments that ACC is currently addressing in appeals (such as
mesothelioma claims)?
2) Is the legal issue complex or novel?
• Does the decision relate to a point of law that has not been considered by ACC/the Courts before?
• Is the review relating to an issue that may require specialist knowledge?
3) Is the review evidence complex or novel?
• Does our approach to certain evidence need to be in line with arguments that ACC is currently running in appeals
(such as mesothelioma claims)?
• Has the customer or their representative presented evidence that requires special legal consideration or careful
1982
cross examination that is better managed by an experienced lawyer?
4) Is there a live appeal or review that is managed by External Counsel that may impact the current review or vice
versa?
Act
• The presence of an existing appeal or review with External Counsel does not necessarily mean that a new review
must be managed by External Counsel. Are the issues at appeal/review related and likely to impact on each other?
• It is often beneficial to discuss this with the External Counsel managing the review or appeal before deciding whether
the new review needs to be managed externally.
5) Is the review high risk?
• Does the review have media involvement or interest?
• Has there been CE involvement or interest?
• Has there been recommendation for a review to be managed by External Counsel in previous correspondence on
the file (such as from TS, TAS or the weekly compensation panel)?
6) Is the review relating to a high-cost decision?
• Is the potential outcome of a review high cost to ACC (such as life-long serious injury cover and entitlements or
retrospective entitlements for a significant period of time?)
Information
7.) Does the customer have legal or advocate representation?
• There may be situations where certain advocates or representatives may be more appropriately managed by Exter-
nal Counsel for strategic reasons.
• ACC must think carefully before referring non-represented reviews to External Counsel because of the potential
perception of this.
8) What would be the public perception or impact on the customer of ACC referring the case for External Counsel
Official
representation?
• The ACC review process is meant to be a less-formal dispute resolution process outside of the Courts so there
needs to be consideration on the potential perception of using External Counsel in the case.
b Seek agreement by speaking to a Senior Review Specialist, if you believe the review meets the consideration points.
the
c In Outlook, email the External Counsel Review Specialist outlining the reasons external legal counsel is necessary.
d Transfer the ‘PRC REV – Complete Admin Review’ to the External Counsel Review Specialist for further management, if there
is agreement that external counsel is appropriate.
NOTE What if there is disagreement about whether the review should be managed by external counsel?
1. Ritwika provides a brief written rationale for the decline and offers a phone conversation if the referring Review Spe-
cialist doesn’t agree
under
2. Phone conversation takes place for Ritwika and the Review Specialist to talk more in attempt to reach agreement
3. If no agreement then escalated to the two Senior Review Specialists
4. If still no agreement, the request can be escalated to Greer
NOTE What if it is not agreed that External Counsel will manage the review?
Retain the review and continue onto making the initial client phone call.
2.0 Refer to Legal Services
Review Specialist
Released
a Create a bulk print selecting those documents in which Legal Services require to provide informed advice or appoint external
counsel.
b Complete the referral template, attach the above selected documents and send to [email address]
Legal Services Referral Template - November 2020.docx
ACC > Customer Insights and Comms > Manage Customer Reviews and Disputes > Manage Customer Reviews > Refer to Legal Services for external counsel
Uncontrolled Copy Only : Version 15.0 : Last Edited Thursday, 19 October 2023 4:59 pm : Printed Tuesday, 2 July 2024 11:16 am
Page 3 of 4
NOTE What is the timeframe to refer to Legal Services?
A referral should be sent within 7 days of receiving the review application. If it is not clear within 7 days that Legal Ser-
vices should be engaged (eg the case does not fall into one of the above categories), then a referral should be made
within 14 days.
Legal Service will advise within 7 days who will be assigned to the case.
c Go to 'Create Bulk Print and Sent CIR task' process to arrange the preparation of the file for Legal Services.
3.0 Book Case Conference
Review Specialist
a Coordinate with the assigned External Counsel (once appointed) and the client to schedule a case conference time.
NOTE What timeframe should a Case Conference be booked within?
The Review Specialist should allow a generous amount of time between the scheduling of the case conference and
1982
the holding off the case conference. (eg If scheduled on day 20 - book the case conference towards Day 70). This will
allow external counsel a sufficient period of time to familiarise themselves with the review matter.
NOTE Who should attend the Case Conference?
The Review Specialist should attend the Case Conference alongside the appointed Legal Counsel. The Review Spe-
Act
cialist will attend as the ACC representative who will maintain the overall management of the review process (eg
updating the Eos cog etc). It could also present valuable development for the Review Specialist.
b Add the appointed External Legal Counsel as a 'non contracted vendor' to Eos as a participant.
c Complete the ACC6239 (Appoint Reviewer) and leave on Eos as 'incomplete',
d Arrange the dispatch of the file to the nominated provider, the client (if they haven't already received a copy) and the selected
EC.
PROCESS
Create Bulk Print and Send CIR Task
Review Specialist
Information
PROCESS
Prepare and Attend Case Conference (CC)
Review Specialist
4.0 Manage ongoing correspondence
Review Specialist
a Remain involved to fulfil requests from Legal Counsel (eg seeking further internal information), and arranging the payment of
Official
Legal Counsel costs.
NOTE Who will write the submissions for hearing?
The appointed Legal Counsel will supply written submissions and represent ACC at the review hearing.
the
under
Released
ACC > Customer Insights and Comms > Manage Customer Reviews and Disputes > Manage Customer Reviews > Refer to Legal Services for external counsel
Uncontrolled Copy Only : Version 15.0 : Last Edited Thursday, 19 October 2023 4:59 pm : Printed Tuesday, 2 July 2024 11:16 am
Page 4 of 4