---

 | www.greenwoodroche.com
This email is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this email, please notify us immediately and then delete this email.  We do not
accept any responsibility for any computer viruses.
 
 
 
 
From: Geoff McLay <[email address]>
Sent: Friday, 13 October 2023 10:10 AM
To: John Greenwood
Cc: Law Examinations
Subject: Re: Victoria University of Wellington equity exam
 
Hi  John
I thought I had sent you a version with the correct mutlichoice answer bolded - let me
know if I didn’t
The fiduciary question is really asking for a comparison with Chrinside v Fay and the
variation Boardman v Phipps .  
Is that enough? Once again if I sent you the wrong version
 
Geoff
On 13 Oct 2023 at 7:47 AM +1300, John Greenwood <[email address]>,
wrote:
Hi Geoff-will get to this later today-is there an answer sheet? Regards John
 
From: Geoff McLay <[email address]>
Sent: Friday, 13 October 2023 3:52 AM
To: John Greenwood
Cc: Law Examinations
Subject: Victoria University of Wellington equity exam
 
Hi John

---

Sorry for delay .  Here is the draft exam.  It is worth 60 of the final grade.  The students have just done an
opinion on whether the the Supreme Court should allow the appeal in Cooper v Pinney., which was worth
40 per cent.
You will see that we are trying multichoice to focus on particular things in the course.  We are still playing
around with the wording - and these kinds of questions scare me a bit, but I think they are sufficiently
développed enough to show you the range of things we are asking
Any questions please just call 
I’m sorry this has taken me so long
Geoff

---