From:
Phil Peet <s7(2)(a)
Sent:
Friday, 16 February 2024 1:51 pm
To:
Mat Collins; Alan Kerr; s7(2)(a)
Regan Toogood;
Dave Smith; Suzanne Rushmere;s7(2)(a)
;s7(2)(a)
Subject:
Re: GTC / UHCC / Abley catch up re landuse assumptions
Follow Up Flag:
Follow up
Flag Status:
Completed
Thanks Mat,
I now have access to the model viewer so I look forward to receiving a copy of the models, once you have
approval to release, so that we can peruse them.
Cheers,
Phil Peet
Director
s7(2)(a)
From: Mat Collins s7(2)(a)
Date: Thursday, 15 February 2024 at 11:50
To: Mat Collins s7(2)(a)
>, Alan Kerr s7(2)(a)
,
s7(2)(a)
Phil Peet
s7(2)(a)
, Regan Toogood s7(2)(a)
, Dave Smith
s7(2)(a)
, [email address] <[email address]>,
s7(2)(a)
Subject: GTC / UHCC / Abley catch up re landuse assumptions
Hi all, my brief minutes from the meeting today along with the modelling summary that was shared on screen.
Please reply all with any corrections/clarifications.
Mat Collins BEng (Hons)
Associate Transportation Planner
s7(2)(a)
Auckland + Wellington + Christchurch
abley.com
Be inspired - sign up now!
1
GTC / UHCC / Abley catch up re landuse assumptions
Thursday, 15 February 2024
11:02 am
GTC / UHCC / Abley catch up re landuse assumptions
Thu, 15 Feb, 11:00 am - 12:00 pm
Microsoft Teams Meeting
Link to Outlook Item
Invitation Message
Participants (9)
Mat Collins (Meeting Organizer)
Alan Kerr (Accepted Meeting)
Phernne Tancock (Accepted Meeting)
Phil Peet (Accepted Meeting)
Regan Toogood (Accepted Meeting)
Dave Smith
Suzanne Rushmere (Accepted Meeting)
Chris Hansen (Accepted Meeting)
Michael Hall (Accepted Meeting)
Notes
DS confirms that the UHCC transport model has been updated. Future land use assumptions for scenarios
have been determined by UHCC
DS gave an overview of the 3 Scenarios modelled, 3 step model with no mode shift
SR suggests that
o Scenario 1 is a starting point for assessing Southern Growth Area
o Scenario 2/3 are based on Council estimates for development areas, may not align with Guildford
Timber intent
SR confirms that all Scenarios account for MDRS, with uplift added to Greenfield Development Areas plus
some growth spread over existing urban, with a sense check to adjust for areas with no / more growth
might be feasible.
PT asks if SR can provide more detail on growth assumptions for Scenario 1.
Action - SR will check internally if growth assumptions and model details can be shared.
DS advises that the UHCC Transport Model is strategic, more detailed assessment using SIDRA is advised.
AK queried trip generation assumptions. DS confirmed that this is based on existing Census data. Based on
vehicle ownership and veh/HH. Existing good access to public transport is reflected in existing traffic
movements, the model has had calibration/validation of the transport model against observed traffic
movements.
DS confirmed that Abley can calibrate the model based on requests from PP/AK.
SR confirms that the transport model is UHCC's best attempt at incorporating PC49 (new road connection to
SGA) and MDRS/IPI. The model is suitable as a start point for Guildford to prep evidence from.
2
Created with OneNote.
3
