Released
under
the Official
Information
s6(a), s6(b)(i)
Act
s6(a)
1982
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Released
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
under
s6(a)
the Official
Information s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Act 1982
Released
14 October 2023
under
Minister of Defence
Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade
NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE DEPLOYMENT TO SUPPORT THE
the
ASSISTED DEPARTURE OF NEW ZEALANDERS FROM ISRAEL AND MIDDLE
EAST
Official
Purpose
To seek approval to deploy a Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft
s6(a)
to the Middle East region
s6(a)
, to assist the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade with consular efforts to facilitate the departure of
New Zealanders and approved individuals from Israel or other locations in the Middle
Information
East region.
Background
1.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) has stood up an Emergency
Crisis Centre to manage the consular response to the Israel/Gaza conflict.
2.
As part of this work, MFAT is working with Etihad Airways to facilitate the
departure of New Zealanders who want to leave Israel. One flight departed from Tel
Aviv earlier today (Saturday) with ten New Zealanders on-board. A further 46 travellers
are booked on Etihad’s Saturday service and will arrive in Abu Dhabi at 4am on
Act
Sunday (NZT). Demand for a third flight on Sunday has so far been low but could
surge if commercial departure options from Israel continue to decline or stop
altogether. MFAT’s advice to New Zealanders who want to leave Israel, is to do so
now.
1982
3.
These departure flights terminate at Abu Dhabi. MFAT has been clear to
travellers that they are responsible for making onward travel arrangements. But we
expect to come under significant pressure by evacuees to provide further assistance,
s6(a)
4.
MFAT has requested support from the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF),
through the deployment of a Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft, to provide strategic airlift to
support the consular response. NZDF is able to provide support to other government
1
agencies, and in support of mandated government activities such as consular efforts,
subject to the approval of relevant Ministers [CAB-21-MIN-0439].
5.
The situation in Israel remains fast evolving. It is hard to predict with certainty
what task the Boeing 757-2K2 could most usefully undertake, or even if it will be
required. However as it will take 2-3 days for the aircraft to reach the region, officials
Released
think it is prudent to seek Ministerial permission now with the best information to hand,
and provide updates if and as the situation evolves.
Rationale for deployment
6.
NZDF support is requested for the following reasons:
a) To provide contingency options against the possibility that a significant number
of New Zealanders become stranded in Abu Dhabi due to the unavailability of
onward flights. Currently, the risk of this is assessed as medium. While
under
capacity exists on Emirates, Qatar Airways and Singapore Airlines’ routes, it is
limited. Availability could also decline quickly as departures from Israel grow.
b) To provide a potential contingency to evacuate New Zealanders from Tel Aviv
whom are not able to depart Tel Aviv, either because one or both of the
remaining assisted departure commercial flights on Etihad Airways are
the
cancelled, or passengers miss those flights and are not able to secure flights
on flights operated by close partners. There are significant concerns that Israeli
airspace may be impacted on 15 October, which would affect the operation of
Official
our third assisted departure flight on Etihad.
c) To contribute to the consular response of close partners,
s6(a)
Proposed deployment
7.
It is proposed that Ministers approve the deployment of: a Boeing 757-2K2
Information
s6(a)
to the Middle East/Europe region
s6(a)
from the
planned date of departure (currently 16 October) of the Boeing 757-2K2.
8.
The NZDF Boeing 757-2K2 is currently scheduled to depart New Zealand not
before 06:00 on Monday 16 October from Royal New Zealand Air Force Base
Whenuapai, Auckland and arrive in the Middle East region on 18 October.
9.
The NZDF plans to base operations
s6(a)
utilising
existing arrangements and resources
s6(a)
Other bases
in the region may however end up being more suitable. The NZDF 757 would then
Act
collect New Zealanders from their location or a location which is convenient for the
New Zealanders to travel to.
1982
10.
s6(a), s6(b)(i)
11. The aircraft would be available to undertake airlift activities in support of the
consular response between locations in the Middle East region,
s6(a)
2
s6(a)
12
s6(a)
Released
13. It is proposed that the Minister of Defence and the Minister of Foreign Affairs be
advised of any increase
s6(a)
. Approval from the Minister of
Defence and the Minister of Foreign Affairs would also be sought if the deployment is
likely to exceed
s6(a)
duration, of if the security situation in the region changes
under
in a manner that would affect the support that NZDF could provide to MFAT.
14. To support the operation and provide consular support to New Zealanders on the
ground, a small MFAT team of up to four persons would be included as part of the
deployment.
the
Risks and considerations
s6(a)
Official
Information
16. While at present the security situation in Israel remains acceptable, it is possible
that the conflict in Israel/Gaza may escalate. In this context, it is possible that that
security situation
s6(a)
would be prejudicial to the health and safety of deployed
personnel. To mitigate this risk, NZDF will continue to assess the situation and will not
Act
deploy to any non-permissive location or if the risks to health and safety exceeds the
approved risk level.
Threat level
1982
s6(a)
18. However, the situation on the ground is still developing and remains uncertain.
The overall security environment could deteriorate rapidly with little warning.
Financial implications
19. The estimated cost of the proposed deployment of the Boeing 757-2K2 is
$0.850M - $1.02M. The cost can be funded from NZDF baselines.
3
Legal Considerations
Legal Basis
20. The deployment will at all times only enter the airspace and territory of other
countries with the consent of those countries, and will at all times comply with
international law. In particular, any flights into Israeli air space will only occur with prior
Released
permission of the Israeli government.
Rules of Engagement
21.
s6(a)
under
22.
s6(a)
the
Law of Armed Conflict
23. As this is an assisted departure of New Zealanders and other eligible persons
Official
only, the deployment will in no way be involved in the long-standing broader Israel-
Palestine conflict, including current hostilities between Israel and Hamas.
s6(a)
Civilian Casualties
Information
24. As this is an
s6(a)
assisted departure of New Zealanders, no civilian
casualties are expected. The situation on the ground in Israel is dynamic. Where lawful
military action results in civilian harm, the reporting requirements in Defence Force
Order 35 are to be followed as soon as reasonably practicable. Due to the nature of
the activity this may be on return to New Zealand.
Human Rights Risk Assessment
25. A human rights risk assessment (HRRA) would not typically be required for a
facilitated departure of this nature, and officials have not conducted one. Should the
situation change, officials would conduct a HRRA to ensure any risk of Detainee
Act
Handling.
26. Although detainee handling is considered to be a remote possibility as a
consequence of this deployment, officials will consider the risks associated. If risk and
1982
likelihood are assessed to be significant, officials would advise Ministers on approach.
Consultation
27. This paper has been jointly prepared by the Ministry of Defence and the New
Zealand Defence Force, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
Recommendations
28. It is recommended that you:
4
a)
Note that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade has requested the
support of the New Zealand Defence Force, as part of its efforts to assist
the departure of New Zealanders and other approved individuals from
Israel, due to the promixity of the Israel/Gaza conflict.
Released
Noted
b)
Note that the New Zealand Defence Force is preparing to deploy a Boeing
757-2K2 aircraft,
s6(a)
,
from 16 October.
Noted
c)
Note that the purpose of the deployment is to provide strategic airlift
under
capability to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, in support of New
Zealand’s consular response to the Israel-Gaza conflict.
Noted
d)
Note that the Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft is expected to be based
s6(a)
the
Noted
Official
e)
Note that the situation is fast evolving and that Ministers will be updated
on any significant changes from parameters outlined in this paper;
Noted
f)
Note that the Boeing 757-2K2 may, if required and provided the
environment remains permissive, undertake flights to to and from Tel Aviv
Information
to assist the departure of New Zealanders and other eligible individuals
stranded in Israel.
Noted
g)
Note that the deployment is estimated to cost $0.850M - $1.02M, and can
be funded from New Zealand Defence Force Baselines.
Noted
h)
s6(a)
Act
Noted
1982
i)
Approve the deployment of a Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft,
s6(a)
to the Middle East Region,
s6(a)
.
Yes No
5
j)
Note that if the commercial efforts to support the departure are successful
and NZDF support for the consular response are assessed as no longer
required ahead of 0600 16 October, officials will inform Ministers.
Noted
Released
k)
Refer this submission to the Prime Minister for concurrence.
Yes / No
l)
Note that the Prime Minister may wish to inform the Leader of the
Opposition of this proposed deployment.
Noted
under
the
ARN SHAW
ANDREW BRIDGMAN
Official
Brigadier
Secretary of Defence
For Chief of Defence Force
Date: 14/10/23
Date: 14/11/23
Information
TAHA McPHERSON
For Secretary of Foreign Affairs
and Trade
Date: 14/10/23
Act 1982
HON ANDREW LITTLE
HON NANAIA MAHUTA
Minister of Defence
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Date: 14 October 2023
Date:
6
Released
18 October 2023
under
Minister of Defence
Acting Minister of Foreign Affairs
UPDATE: NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE DEPLOYMENT TO SUPPORT
the
THE ASSISTED DEPARTURE OF NEW ZEALANDERS FROM ISRAEL AND
MIDDLE EAST
Official
Purpose
To update you on the easing of demand for consular assistance stemming from the
Israel-Gaza conflict, and to inform you that officials now assess that there is currently
no consular requirement to deploy the New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) Boeing
757-2K2 aircraft.
Information
The aircraft remains available for tasking under the permissions you granted on
14 October if the situation deteriorates. NZDF staff will remain integrated as part of the
MFAT-led Emergency Coordination Centre (ECC) that is managing the consular
response to the Israel-Gaza conflict and preparing for future contingencies as the
situation evolves.
Government support assisted the departure of New Zealanders from Israel
1.
The current status of MFAT’s consular response to the Israel/Gaza conflict is:
Act
a) Assisted departure flights operated from Tel Aviv to Abu Dhabi over the
weekend, with 55 individuals (including 40 New Zealanders) departing Israel
on these services. We understand almost all travellers have now booked
onwards travel from Abu Dhabi to New Zealand or other final locations. Of the
1982
capacity we had secured with Etihad, only 31% was used.
b) Many of the 232 New Zealanders still registered as being in Israel have now
departed the country.
c) MFAT’s present focus is on a much smaller group (approximately 20) that have
not replied to SafeTravel messages or attempts to contact them. Some of these
travellers may need assistance.
d) Commercial flights out of Israel continue to operate. Our advice to
New Zealanders who want to depart Israel, is to do so now using those flights.
1
e) The most challenging consular cases are in Gaza, where 11 New Zealanders
(and 1 family member) remain. MFAT has sought approval from the Israeli
Ministry of Foreign Affairs for them to depart Gaza via the currently closed
Rafah crossing into Egypt. However, the situation at the crossing is complex
and uncertain, and departure cannot be guaranteed. Note, however, 8
Released New Zealanders did manage to depart the West Bank via Jordan on
16 October.
The need to deploy the NZDF Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft was kept under review
2.
On 14 October, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defence approved the
deployment of a NZDF Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft
s6(a)
to the
Middle East/Europe regions to assist the consular response to the current Israel-Gaza
crisis and facilitate the departure of New Zealanders and approved individuals from
Israel or other locations in the Middle East/Europe regions.
under
3.
The 14 October submission noted that Ministers would be informed if the aircraft
was not assessed as required to assist the consular response.
Officials assess that there is currently no consular requirement to deploy
4.
Officials have kept the consular situation under constant review as they
the
assessed whether the deployment should proceed.
5.
Officials now assess that there is currently no consular requirement to deploy the
Official
NZDF Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft to the Eastern Mediterranean or the Middle East to
assist departure of New Zealanders from the Middle East region. This is because:
a) Most New Zealanders who arrived in Abu Dhabi on MFAT assisted departure
flights on 14 and 15 October, have either already arranged onwards travel
bookings from UAE or preferred the certainty of making their own onwards
commercial travel bookings;
Information
b) At the present time, the demand for assisted departure flights out of Israel has
stabilised at a diminished level, with commercial routes departing Tel Aviv
continuing to remain open;
c) Assisted departure flights by
s6(a)
are operating with significant
spare capacity, and may wind down in the coming days.
6.
Any deployment would now take place only if the situation changed to the point
where a consular need required the aircraft to play a role in evacuations.
The situation will remain under close review
Act
7.
The NZDF Boeing 757-2K2 will now continue with previously planned tasks, but
remains available to assist with the evacuation of New Zealanders, if required, s6(a)
dating from the 14 October submission. Ministers will be informed if a
1982
need to deploy the aircraft eventuates.
8.
NZDF will continue to be integrated in MFAT’s Emergency Coordination Centre
that is managing the consular response to the Israel-Gaza conflict and preparing for
future contingencies as the situation evolves.
9.
Officials noted that while the situation in Israel is relatively stable, the situation
remains fluid, and the security situation in both Israel/the Occupied Palestinian
2
Territories (OPT)1 and potentially the broader region could change quickly
s6(a)
10. Should a widening of the Israel-Gaza conflict result in a need to assist with any
international evacuation responses that might emerge, officials will engage with key
Released
partners to explore how New Zealand is best placed to contribute, with a view to
providing early advice to Ministers on a potential New Zealand response, or
contribution to a broader international response.
Consultation
11. This paper has been jointly prepared by the Ministry of Defence, the
New Zealand Defence Force, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.
under
Recommendations
12. It is recommended that you:
a)
Note that on 14 October, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defence
approved the deployment of a NZDF Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft
s6(a)
to the Middle East Region to assist the consular
the
response to the current Israel-Gaza crisis;
Noted
Official
b)
Note that the 14 October submission noted that Ministers would be
informed if the aircraft was not required to assist the consular response;
Noted
Information
c)
Note that MFAT assisted 55 individuals (including 40 New Zealanders) to
depart Tel Aviv to Abu Dhabi over the weekend, and almost all travellers
have booked onwards commercial travel from Abu Dhabi to New Zealand
or other final locations;
Noted
d)
Note that the demand for assisted departure flights out of Israel has
Act
stabilised at a diminished level with commercial routes departing Tel Aviv
remaining open;
Noted
1982
e)
Note that officials assess that there is currently no consular requirement
to deploy the NZDF Boeing 757-2K2 aircraft to the Eastern Mediterranean
or Middle East to assist departure of New Zealanders from the Middle East
region;
Noted
1 Notwithstanding Israel’s military withdrawl in 2005, Israel still exerts a sufficient degree of control over Gaza
to be considered an Occupying Power.
3
f)
Note that the aircraft remains available to deploy under the permissions
set out in the 14 October submission
s6(a)
, if the situation
deteriorates further and there is sufficient identified need;
Noted
Released
g)
Note that the regional security situation remains fluid, and the security
situation in both Israel/the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and
potentially the broader region, could change quickly;
Noted
h)
Note that NZDF will continue to be integrated in MFAT’s Emergency
Coordination Centre that is managing the consular response to the Israel-
under
Gaza conflict and preparing for future contingencies as the situation
evolves;
Noted
i)
Note that Ministers will be informed if a need to deploy the aircraft
the
eventuates or provided with early advice if a need to assist with any
international evacuation responses emerges;
Official
Noted
j)
Refer this submission to the Prime Minister for information;
Yes / No
k)
Recommend that a copy of this submission is shared with the Leader of
Information
the Opposition, for his awareness.
Yes / No
Act
KR SHORT
ANDREW BRIDGMAN
Air Marshal
Secretary of Defence
Chief of Defence Force
Date: 18 October 2023
1982
Date: 18 October 2023
4
Released
TAHA MacPHERSON
For Secretary of Foreign Affairs
and Trade
Date: 18 October 2023
under
the
Official
HON ANDREW LITTLE
Minister of Defence/Acting Minister
of Foreign Affairs
Date:
18 October 2023
Information
RT HON CHRIS HIPKINS
Prime Minister
Act
Date:
1982
5
Released
21 October 2023
Minister of Defence
Minister of Foreign Affairs
NEW ZEALAND DEFENCE FORCE PERSONNEL DEPLOYMENTS IN
under
RESPONSE
TO
THE
ISRAEL-GAZA
s6(a)
Purpose
1.
To update you on the deployment of New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF)
the
personnel in support of the New Zealand Government consular response to the Israel-
Gaza situation, and to seek your approval to pre-position
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
for contingency planning, in case the situation
Official
deteriorates and further NZDF assistance to consular efforts is required.
Middle East security and consular situation
2.
The security situation in Israel and Gaza, and in parts of the wider region,
remains tense.
s6(a)
Information
. There are already signs of
unrest in the wider Middle East region beyond Israel and Gaza; protests, movement
of militias, strikes on munition shipments (Syria), and clearing of civilians from areas
of possible threat are all occurring, while political and online rhetoric are strident. The
implications of any potential Israeli ground operation in Gaza on wider regional stability
remain unclear but are potentially significant.
3.
For New Zealand, the consular situation is manageable at the present time,
with most New Zealanders who wish to depart Israel and the Occupied West Bank
having done so already. Commercial flights are also still operating from Tel Aviv and
Act
other regional airports, although could be disrupted at any time. A small number of
New Zealand nationals remain in Gaza and the West Bank, where the ability of New
Zealand (and other partners) to assist our nationals remains very limited.
1982
4.
New Zealand has raised the SafeTravel alert level to ‘Level 4 – Do Not Travel’
for Lebanon, where there are currently 14 New Zealanders registered on SafeTravel.
s6(a)
1
s6(a)
s6(a), s9(2)(g)(i)
Released
6.
However, the significant uncertainties in the wider context (including where,
when and how any escalation of violence or conflict from Israel/Gaza could spill over
into the wider region), and the potential gravity of any further escalation, are such that
it would be prudent to ensure we are well positioned to assist New Zealanders should
an extraordinary consular response be necessary.
under
7.
Given New Zealand’s geographical distance from the Middle East region (which
limits our ability to respond rapidly to any changes in the security environment), a
prudent approach of ensuring New Zealand has suitable NZDF capability available to
support a consular response would have the objective of:
- Ensuring that NZDF personnel who could assist with consular response should
the
the situation worsen, are pre-positioned in a proximate location to unfolding
events (
s6(a)
); and
Official
- Ensuring that NZDF and consular personnel are well integrated into the
contingency planning processes of other partners on the ground, to ensure
opportunities to synchronise and leverage consular response efforts are
identified early.
Information
s6(a)
8.
While the consular need in the region is manageable at the present time, the
situation could deteriorate rapidly with implications for the broader Middle East region.
While those registered on SafeTravel are low as noted, demand for consular
assistance could increase significantly if conflict spreads. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs
and Trade (MFAT) has already deployed additional staff to Cairo, Ankara, Tel Aviv and
Cyprus to assist with consular and other functions.
9.
As a contingency, to give the Government options and to support the objectives
Act
set out in paragraph 7 above, the NZDF recommends the pre-positioning
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
1982
s6(a), s6(b)(i)
2
s6(a)
6( )
12.
s6(a)
Released
s6(a)
under
6( )
14.
s6(a)
.
the
s6(a)
s6(a)
Official
Information
Reputational and relationship benefits
16.
New Zealand is heavily reliant on support by partners in a range of consular
contexts, particularly in places where there is no New Zealand consular presence or
in high threat situations
s6(a)
Act 1982
17.
s6(a)
s6(a)
Any other operational function would be subject to approval by Ministers
3
18.
The
s6(a)
would have no mandate to undertake any operational activity
beyond engaging in contingency civilian evacuation planning and information sharing
s6(a)
activities
Any decision to deploy the team
s6(a)
would be subject
to further approval by relevant Ministers.
s6(a)
19.
The
will also not be involved in any operational planning that may be
Released
being undertaken by partner militaries
s6(a)
beyond contingency planning for
military-assisted evacuations.
s6(a)
20.
If the situation requires it, and if it is authorised by Ministers
ould
assist more actively in consular efforts.
s6(a)
under
Other Options considered
21.
s6(a)
the Official
22
6( )
s6(a)
Information
Risks
s6(a)
s6(a)
Act 1982
24.
s6(a)
4
Communications
25.
Once direction is received by Ministers, officials will develop advice for Ministers
on public communications (if any) relating to the pre-positioning
s6(a)
Released
Update on other elements of NZDF assistance
26.
On 13 October officials advised that the Chief of Defence Force had authorised
the deployment of one NZDF liaison officer to
s6(a)
to perform liaison and
communication in support of New Zealand’s consular response, and one
to support the
s6(a)
s6(a)
liaison officer.
s6(a)
under
27.
On 14 October, the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defence approved the
deployment of an NZDF Boeing 757 – 2K2 to the Middle East/Europe regions, to
support the New Zealand consular response. On 18 October, officials advised
Ministers that due to the easing of demand for consular assistance, there was not
the
presently a need to deploy the aircraft. However, the aircraft would remain available
for tasking under the permissions granted on 14 October, if the situation deteriorates.
Official
28.
In response to the rapidly evolving situation the Chief of Defence Force has
assessed that sending s6(a) further NZDF personnel to the region was necessary to
better support information flow and situational awareness.
s6(a)
Information
Threat levels
s6(a)
The direct threat to NZDF personnel remains
unchanged by recent events, however, the collateral threat has increased.
Recommendations
Act
30.
It is recommended that you:
a)
Note that the security situation in the Middle East as a result of the
1982
conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza in remains tense, but that the
number of New Zealanders requiring consular assistance as a result of
the security situation is currently low.
Noted
b)
Note that the deployment of additional NZDF personnel would ensure
that New Zealand is positioned to be able to assist New Zealand
nationals if the situation changes rapidly.
Noted
5
c)
Note that as a prudent contingency, the NZDF is preparing to pre-
position
s6(a)
s6(a)
to
assist in consular contingency planning efforts alongside close partners.
Released
Noted
s6(a)
d)
Approve the pre-positioning
s6(a)
s6(a)
.
Yes / No
e)
Note the
s6(a)
will not undertake any
operational activity beyond engaging in liaison, contingency planning for
s6(a)
consular responses and information sharing activities
and that
under
any further operational activity by the
s6(a)
will be subject to approval by Ministers.
Noted
f)
Note that on 13 October officials advised that the Chief of Defence
the
Force had authorised the deployment of two NZDF personnel to
support the New Zealand response to the Israel-Gaza situation.
Noted
Official
g)
Note that the Chief of Defence Force has subsequently authorised the
deployment of the following additional NZDF personnel:
i)
s6(a)
Information
ii)
s6(a)
Noted
h)
Note that the Boeing 757 – 2K2 aircraft remains available to deploy
under the permissions set out in the 14 October submission s6(a)
, if the situation deteriorates further and there is sufficient
identified need;
Act
Noted
1982
6
i)
Refer a copy of this submission to the Prime Minister.
Yes / No
Released
j)
Note that it may be appropriate to consult with the Leader of the
Opposition prior to a final decision being made, on the basis that a
decision should not be deferred until the next Government is formed.
Noted
under
the
pp
Official
KR SHORT
ANDREW BRIDGMAN
Air Marshal
Secretary of Defence
Chief of Defence Force
Date: 21/10/23
Date: 21/10/23
Information
pp
CHRIS SEED
Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Date: 21/10/23
Act
1982
HON ANDREW LITTLE
HON NANAIA MAHUTA
Minister of Defence
Minister of Foreign Affairs
Date:
Date:
21 October 2023
21 October 2023
7
1982
Act
s6(a)
s6(a)
Information
s6(a), s6(b)(i)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Official
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
the
under s6(a)
s6(a)
Released
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
1982
Act
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a), s6(b)(i)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a
s6(a)
)
Information
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Official
the
under
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a), s6(b)(i)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Released
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
1982
s6(a)
s6(a)
Act
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Information
s6(a)
Official
s6(a)
the
s6(a)
s6(a)
under
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Released
s6(a)
s6(a)
1982
s6(a)
s6(a)
Act
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Information
Official
the
under
s6(a)
s6(a)
Released
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
1982
s6(a)
Act
Information
Official
the
under
Released
s6(a)
s6(a)
1982
s6(a)
Act
s6(a), s6(b)(i)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Information
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Official
the
under
s6(a)
s6(a)
Released s6(a
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
1982
Act
Information
s6(a)
Official
the
s6(a)
s6(
)
under
s6(a)
s6(a)
s6(a)
Released
1982
Act
Information
Official
the
under
Released
