This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Questions to Clive (CEO) and Weston (Mayor) and Councillors'.


 
7 November 2023 
Barry Murphy 
[FYI request #23796 email]  
 
 
 
 
 
Dear Mr Murphy 
 
OFFICIAL INFORMATION REQUEST  
 
I  refer  to  your  official  information  request  dated  11  August  2023  Questions  to  Clive  (CEO)  and 
Weston (mayor) and Councillors.  
 
We  apologise  for  the  lateness  of  this  response  and  acknowledge  it  is  not  within  legislative 
timeframes. 
 
1.      Clive & Weston, if you could both please provide a written statement as to the decision to use Field 1 
rather than Field 2 for the first stage as per question 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTRxFXrXk9wQ&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d50s   
 
Does not fit criteria for OIA has been forwarded for response. 
 
2.      What concerns were raised as to potential issues of this project, by any staff members or council 
contractors 
3.      What consideration was taken into account for Snowmass residents, as I’m certain there would have 
been some 
4.      What concerns were raised about Carrot Park, again Im sure there were some; if not then you don’t 
understand the value of your tourism or the carrot park   
Q 2,3 & 4 also in OIA request dated 18 July 2023, fyi20762, response provided 4 October 2023.  
 
5.      As per https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTRxUDrCk1xA&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d243s 
we are being told this is going ahead no matter what, I would like to know 
what each existing council representative feels about this. 
Does not fit criteria for OIA. 
 
6.      What was the process for choosing the independent and please provide documentation and policies 
surrounding this - https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTRxcEqCxpxg&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d802s  
 
 


Page 2 
 
Ruapehu District Council (RDC) holds a list of approved Commissioners of which Greg Hill was 
initially selected to determine the applications. The Executive Manager Regulatory & Customer 
Services holds delegated authority to make this selection, based on the Commissioner’s level of 
skills, experience, availability and understanding of our Rohe. However, in this particular occasion 
the Applicant has subsequently requested all applications (including those lodged with Horizons 
Regional Council) to be notified. 

Due to this request, RDC and Horizons will work together to determine a suitable independent 
Hearings panel to hear all applications in one Hearing. This discussion and decision will be held 
once all outstanding information is received from the Applicant and the applications are considered 
complete. 

This process is supported by RDC’s delegation register and the Resource Management Act 1991. 
7.      A question stating the independent may not be impartial was raised, was this at any time a concern, 
and if so, how was it mitigated - https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0dU-
n84kw&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d842s  
 
Does not fit criteria for OIA. 
 
8.      The walkway between snowmass and the carrot park is of great concern, as it will be a built site for a 
long period of time, the access may need to be cornered off, what are the plans for this and will there be a 
period of time it is closed for public use, and if so, what alternatives will be in place for people walking to 
town as no footpaths exist on the dangerous 70km/h SH49 - 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTRxMFontpxg&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d877s 
Under section 17(e) LGOIMA 1987 the document alleged to contain the information requested 
does not exist or despite reasonable efforts to locate it, cannot be found. 
 
9.      Please provide the traffic report stated in this question - 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTRxJYons-
wg&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d1130s 
Traffic report available kaingaora.govt.nz/teiteidrive 
 
10.     Clive, over the phone, you told me the funding was originally allocated for Taumarunui but was shifted 
to Ohakune due to a land claim from Ngata Rangi on the Taumarunui land, what was the address of the 
property at Taumarunui that was originally proposed  
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0JX_35olQ&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d1509s 

 
 
11.     Clive, you state there was. Community consultation as per 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0BR-
 

Page 3 
 
iU6kw&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d1560sA
m I correct that the only document pertaining is “Public and Affordable Housing Asset and Tenancy 
Management Strategy” or are there others?   
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0BZoippkw&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2esaveohakune%2ecom%2fpost%2frdc-
s-supposed-consultation-my-views 
No others. 
 
12.     Your document stated in point 11 highlighted wrap around services etc, have these been put in place, 
and if so what has changed since the policy was accepted?   
Under section 17(e) LGOIMA 1987 the document alleged to contain the information requested 
does not exist or despite reasonable efforts to locate it, cannot be found. 
 
13.     KO stated “it is not their roll to make that happen” to bring GP’s etc, so how will this happen - 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTRxAFqyg_kQ&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d1602s 
 Under section 17(e) LGOIMA 1987 the document alleged to contain the information requested 
does not exist or despite reasonable efforts to locate it, cannot be found. 
 
14.     The community confirmed the right to housing, but not the placement and intensification of this 
development, why did RDC thing this was ok - https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0RQ_ShplA&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d1696s 
Does not fit criteria for OIA. 
 
15.     As per https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0QAry9uwA&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dC
i%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d1844s 
please advise what consultation was done as KO stated this is RDC land and 
“we can ask Clive, where was that consultation and who was it had with”, please provide this information 
On listening to this section of the meeting we require more clarity around this question.   
 
16.     Clive, your statement at https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0RQ_X5qxw&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dC
i%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d1972s 
“Council felt, it was part of its roll to try and partner with people”; can you 
please advise who “Council” is and who decided this. Please also advise what the meaning of “felt” was in 
this context. Please confirm if this was an emotional feeling or a feeling in the best interest of rate payers 
and advise the people that had this feeling and the people that didn’t. 
Does not fit criteria for OIA. 
 
17.     Clive, please advise if any directives were given to you or any RDC staff member by Megan Woods (or 
via Kainga Ora) or any other minister or their staff, to keep this project quiet; and what those directives 
were. 
7(2)(i) enable any local authority holding the information to carry on, without prejudice or 
disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations). 
 
18.     Clive, you said at https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0NUqS4_xg&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d2031s 
that there was no point consulting on a piece of land that the government 
hadn’t committed to. Please clarify who you refer to here with “consulting” was this no point consulting 
with third parties, or with the community. If the former, consulting work started in at least October 2022. If 
the latter, why did you not consult with the public and rate payers before submitting resource consent, or 
when you already had design layouts of LOTs of land back in September 2022? 
Does not fit criteria for OIA has been forwarded for response. 
 

 

Page 4 
 
 
19.     There are 12 people on the MSD waitlist for houses in Ohakune. You were asked if people would be 
imported to fill the 15 homes proposed to be built as per 
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTRxdSqXhvwg&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d2040s 
. I pose the question, why is Ngata Rangi given special preference in this 
project for housing, and why are the people Helen refers to and you refer to, not following government 
process and being given special preferences? 
20.     Clive, can you or Weston confirm that the houses available on TradeMe that have double glazing and 
good heating standards etc, listed for under $500k are more expensive than the houses and land you are 
proposing (i.e. this project is a cheaper alternative to buying healthy homes off the market). Or can you 
confirm whether this will be a cost to tax payers as this is the only way to use government resources / 
money to get housing in the area 
Does not fit criteria for OIA has been forwarded for response. 
 
21.     We would like to request a zoom call with you and Weston for the public benefit of ratepayers as 
requested https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=8510&d=htHV5ALgD-
XFCO3ZuHuSI2x2pxEcmziTR0RRrihuzg&u=https%3a%2f%2fwww%2eyoutube%2ecom%2fwatch%3fv%3dCi
%5fXVvmmPr0%26t%3d2260s 

 
You  have  the  right  to  seek  an  investigation  and  review  by  the  Ombudsman  of  this  decision. 
Information  about  how  to  make  a  complaint  is  available  at  www.ombudsman.parliament.nz  or 
freephone 0800 802 602.  
 
If you wish to discuss any aspect of your request with us, including this decision, please feel free to 
contact [details of contact person].  
 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
 
 
Maggie Flonk 
MANAGER, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT