-----Original Message-----
From: ASE
[mailto:[FYI request #17825 email]] Sent: Friday, 3 December 2021 4:13 PM
To: C Hipkins (MIN)
<[Chris Hipkins request email]> Subject: Official Information request - COVID-19 inoculations and culpability for human rights
violations, crimes against humanity, and/or war crimes
To Chris Hipkins,
To the extent that it is practicable, this request extends to all persons, boards, councils, committees,
subcommittees, organisations, bodies, or individuals advising on such matters, or otherwise exerting
influence in any capacity. If this request relates to information that you have reason to believe may
be held by any other persons or bodies, I trust that you will forward this request to them and advise
accordingly.
Is Chris Hipkins aware of any long-term safety data for any COVID-19 inoculations? If so, what is that
data?
Is Chris Hipkins aware of any long-term efficacy data for any COVID-19 inoculations? If so, what is
that data?
Considering what is and what is not known of long-term safety and efficacy of COVID-19
inoculations, what consideration has Chris Hipkins given to the status of COVID-19 inoculations as
“experimental” medical treatments? What scientific and medical basis does Chris Hipkins have for
asserting that COVID-19 inoculations are not “experimental” medical treatments? If this has not
been considered by Chris Hipkins, then why has this not been considered?
What contingency plans have been considered by Chris Hipkins, if COVID-19 inoculations may prove
to be unsafe, ineffective, unnecessary, and/or otherwise harmful to personal health and/or public
health (as “public health” is generally understood)? If this has not been considered by Chris Hipkins,
then why has this not been considered?
In consideration of positions, polices, and/or legislation (including, but not limited to messaging and
medical advice, collective punishments, and segregation) which may appear as intent to use force,
fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion to encourage,
incentivize, or otherwise promote COVID-19 inoculations, what consideration has Chris Hipkins given
to the effects of such positions, polices, and/or legislation respecting healthcare providers' legal and
ethical obligations to empower their patients to exercise their rights of informed consent (including
rights of informed refusal)? How do such positions, polices, and/or legislation respect patients' rights
regarding informed consent (including rights of informed refusal)? If this has not been considered by
Chris Hipkins, then why has this not been considered?
In consideration of positions, polices, and/or legislation (including, but not limited to messaging and
medical advice, collective punishments, and segregation) which may appear as intent to use force,
fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion to encourage,
incentivize, or otherwise promote COVID-19 inoculations, what consideration has Chris Hipkins given
to the effects of such positions, polices, and/or legislation respecting individual human rights
(including human rights as recognised under national and international frameworks), such as
individual human rights to privacy and confidentiality of medical information; and individual human
rights to refuse medical treatment, with or without reason? If this has not been considered by Chris
Hipkins, then why has this not been considered?
In consideration of the questions raised above, and related matters, what consideration has Chris
Hipkins given to the possibility that positions, polices, and/or legislation (including, but not limited to
messaging and medical advice, collective punishments, and segregation) which may appear as intent
to use force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior forms of constraint or coercion to
encourage, incentivize, or otherwise promote COVID-19 inoculations, may expose proponents,
advocates, and/or actors on behalf of such positions, polices, and/or legislation to culpability for
human rights violations, crimes against humanity, and/or war crimes? If this has not been
considered by Chris Hipkins, then why has this not been considered?
Thank you,
ASE 2021120302
-------------------------------------------------------------------
This is an Official Information request made via the FYI website.
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FYI request #17825 email]
Is [Chris Hipkins request email] the wrong address for Official Information requests to Chris Hipkins?
If so, please contact us using this form:
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&d=m5Ct4QUXSUDNOu3-
VoZzdxue4tQJdBQIg0RsOx3xUg&u=https%3a%2f%2ffyi%2eorg%2enz%2fchange%5frequest%2fnew
%3fbody%3dchris%5fhipkins
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy
and copyright policies:
https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=15517&d=m5Ct4QUXSUDNOu3-
VoZzdxue4tQJdBQIg0k9OxmgBQ&u=https%3a%2f%2ffyi%2eorg%2enz%2fhelp%2fofficers
If you find this service useful as an Official Information officer, please ask your web manager to link
to us from your organisation's OIA or LGOIMA page.
