This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'LGWM Golden Mile Alternatives and Options Report Supporting Analysis'.

1 November 2021 
Tony Randle 
[FYI request #16347 email] 
REF: OIA-8866 
Dear Tony 
Request made under the Official Information Act 1982 
Thank you for your email of 1 October 2021 containing requests for information under the Official 
Information Act 1982 (the Act) made as a follow-up to my response to you of 20 September 2021. 
Please find attached a clearer version of Table 3 - Summary of Golden Mile Section Relationships on 
page 7 of Appendix D Bus Travel Time, Reliability, Comfort and Convenience Report. 
We have reviewed the decision about your request, and it remains unchanged. We do not consider 
there are any other factors which would render it desirable, in the public interest, to make the 
previously withheld or refused information available. Under section 28 of the Act, you have the right to 
ask the Ombudsman to review my decision to withhold some information and refuse some portions 
this request. The contact details for the Ombudsman can be located at 
Regarding question 15, there were no attachments to the original email. The pdf noted attachments as 
a couple of the images were deleted in the process – these were restored in the pdf that was sent to 
Regarding part 2 of your follow up request, an agenda for the MCA workshop is included in document 
12. As you were previously advised, all meeting notes and discussion points were captured in MCA 
scoring and summary, which were provided to you. Your request for further information is refused 
under section 18(e) of the Act as the documents requested do not exist. 
The complete calculation and formula you have requested in parts 1, 4, 9, 10, 12, 31, 35 and 36 are 
the intellectual property of the respective contractors that completed this work. As such I am 
withholding this information under section 9(2)(b) to protect information where the making available of 
the information: 
would disclose a trade secret; or 

would be likely unreasonably to prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied 
or who is the subject of the information. 
In addition, this information is withheld under section 9(2)(ba)(i) to protect information which is subject 
to an obligation of confidence or which any person has been or could be compelled to provide under 
the authority of any enactment, where the making available of the information would be likely to 
prejudice the supply of similar information, or information from the same source, and it is in the public 
interest that such information should continue to be supplied. 
In regard to part 16, the source for this data was modelling. We provided you the outputs of modelling 
undertaken, but “actual calculation spreadsheets” as you have requested do not exist. I am refusing 
this request under section 18(e) of the Act as the document alleged to contain the information 
requested does not exist. 
The snapper data you have asked for in your follow up to request 37 consists of card numbers which 
may identify individuals. I am withholding this information under section 9(2)(a) of the Act, to protect 
the privacy of individuals. 
With respect to the information that has been withheld, I do not consider there are any other factors 
which would render it desirable, in the public interest, to make the information available. 
As noted above, under section 28 of the Act, you have the right to ask the Ombudsman to review my 
decision to withhold certain information and refuse some requests.  
If you would like to discuss this reply with Let’s Get Wel ington Moving, please contact Willy Trolove, 
Interim Communications and Engagement Manager, by email to [email address]. 
Yours sincerely 
David Dunlop  
Interim Programme Director