Indicative Weighting Scenarios
Investment  Focus on improving  Focus on people 
Program fit and delivery 
Workshop 
Objective 
Focus on Safety
Economic Focus
Social Focus
the public realm
movement
focus
Weighting 
Weightings
1982
The scenario places emphasis 
This scenario applies increased 
This scenario assumes increased emphasis 
This scenario addresses the relative 
Default weighting 
This scenario places increased 
on interventions that move 
importance on safety outcomes and 
on broader program fit and the ability to  This secenario assumes a  social support and business impacts.  It 
scenario - weighting  emphasis on the on improved 
Description*
people through the corridor, 
reduces overall weighting applied to  quickly deliver outcomes.  It reduces overal  
priority is placed on 
redcues overall weightings for 
Weighting determined by 
based on LGWM 
public realm, by increasing the 
with increased weighting 
investment objectives, while increasing  weightings for investment objectives and 
achieving maximum 
investment objectives and applies 
workshop MCA Assessors
priorities and 
weighting applied to place and  applied to bus travel time and  the weighting applied to pedestrian and  applies increased weighing to program fit 
economic return.
increased weighting to social and 
investment objectives
pedestrians.
pedestrian capacity.
general safety.
and delivery aspects. 
business impacts.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Act 
01
Investment Objective
IO - Bus Travel time and reliability
25%
15%
35%
10%
20%
20%
20%
21%
High (100%)
01
Investment Objective
IO - Bus passenger boarding and alighting comfort and conven
25ie
% nce
15%
10%
10%
20%
20%
20%
21%
High (100%)
01
Investment Objective
IO -  Pedestrian safety
20%
20%
10%
60%
20%
20%
20%
21%
High (100%)
01
Investment Objective
IO - Pedestrian capacity
20%
20%
35%
10%
20%
20%
20%
18%
High (80%)
02
Investment Objective
IO - Improve Place quality
10%
30%
10%
10%
20%
20%
20%
19%
High (90%)
Investment Objectives Total Weighting
60%
60%
60%
40%
20%
60%
20%
80%
03
Effect
E - Social 
17%
17%
17%
10%
10%
17%
25%
19%
Medium (70%)
04
Effect
E - Retail Impacts
17%
17%
17%
10%
10%
17%
25%
20%
High (80%)
5b
Effect
E - Cycling Level of Service 
17%
17%
17%
10%
10%
17%
10%
16%
Medium (60%)
06
Effect
E - General Safety 
17%
17%
17%
50%
10%
17%
10%
19%
Medium (70%)
E - Sustainability
17%
17%
17%
10%
10%
17%
10%
16%
Medium (60%)
07
Effect
E - Fit with LGWM Programme
17%
17%
17%
10%
50%
17%
10%
10%
Low
Effects  Objectives Total Weighting
20%
20%
20%
40%
40%
20%
60%
10%
11
Delivery, Maintenance and Operation
DM&O - Delivery
33%
33%
33%
33%
40%
33%
33%
40%
Low (less than 50%)
12
Delivery, Maintenance and Operation
DM&O - Operations and Maintenance
33%
33%
33%
33%
20%
33%
33%
55%
High
13
Delivery, Maintenance and Operation
DM&O - Timeframe for Delivery
33%
33%
33%
33%
40%
33%
33%
5%
Low (less than 10%)
DM&O Total Weighting
20%
20%
20%
20%
40%
20%
20%
10%
*These scenarios are place holder examples and may be replaced or updated as per LGWM instruction.
Information 
Official 
the 
under 
Released 

---