This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'COVID-19 Technical Advisory Group: Advice on asymptomatic Covid-19 testing'.
Document Two
Science & Technical Advisory 
Request for Advice (RfA) 
This form contains the details relevant to the questions posed to the Science and Technical 
Advisory (STA) team. The STA will respond to the request using this form which will also be 
stored in the STA content management system for future reference. 
This form, or parts of it, may also be forwarded to other relevant parties as appropriate. 
Whether all close contacts of a confirmed case should have a Day 12 test before 
Subject 
release from quarantine 
Title 
Day 12 PCR testing of close contacts 
1982
Out of scope
Act 
Information 
Official 
the 
under 
Released 

Document Two
Response to Request for Advice 
 

Out of scope
1982
Act 
Information 
Official 
the 
 
Meeting summary – Day 12 PCR testing of close contacts 18/08/2020 
Issue: whether all close contacts of a confirmed case should be required to have 
under 
day 12 PCR testing prior to release from quarantine (currently only required for 
people in managed isolation facilities, and Health Care Workers as part of their 
return to work criteria). The main considerations are the utility and feasibility of 
undertaking day 12 PCR testing for close contacts, and whether it needs to be more 
nuanced – e.g. testing just household close contacts, vs all close contacts. 
Released 
Other input: 
The NZ Micro Network considered this from a lab perspective and suggest that 
asymptomatic close contacts should be tested at day 12: 

To provide consistency with MIF testing of incoming travellers 

Makes more sense that some other testing currently performed (population at 
higher risk) 

Low volumes, so wouldn’t be a huge pressure on labs 

Note however that how/where these people will be tested may be an issue 
(e.g. for rural communities) if these people are not also in MIF or a specific 
local solution is not in place (e.g. one dedicated clinic or testing site).  

The opportunity to add alternative swabbing was also raised. 
 

Document Two
Little evidence was found for what other countries are doing in 
this space. In Tasmania they encourage close contacts to get a 
test around day 10-12.  
Meeting summary 
In principle, there was general support for the concept of day 12 testing of all or 
some close contacts. However, it was noted that testing volumes for close contacts 
may not actually be low, and it could be quite complicated. There were also 
questions raised about whether this would be enforceable. 
There was agreement that different types of close contacts are at different levels of 
risk. In particular, there was agreement that household close contacts are at 
particularly high risk (similar to those in MIFs) and should be tested twice. If there is 
a need to prioritise close contact testing this is where efforts should be concentrated.  
1982
It was suggested that testing of close contacts outside of the household level might 
be at the discretion of the PHU, based on an assessment of risk on a case by case 
Act 
basis. For example, if transmission is seen in a workplace (e.g. Americold cluster), 
day 12 testing should extend to all workers there. 
There was a comment that there may be value in developing a three-level risk 
system to help determine who should be tested twice. 
There was some discussion about whether children who are close contacts should 
also be tested. It was noted that at the moment there doesn’t appear to be an issue 
Information 
with children having the second test. 
However, there was some concern that having different recommendations for 
different types of close contacts may create confusion (among different types of 
close contacts, and for those making case by c
Official ase decisions about testing). Any 
decision will need to be clearly communicated, including to Healthline. 
the 
 
 
 
under 
Sarah Mitchell drafted an internal memo on 20 August based on the 
discussion, with further additions/ amendments made by Harriette Carr 
before approval by Caroline McElnay.  
 
Note that for the current Auckland based outbreak, the local 
Next Steps  Released 
Medical Officer of Health has recommended all close contacts have 
a day 12 test.
 
 
See memo attached for reference (unsigned version) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Document Two
 
Memo   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date: 
20.08.2020 
To: 
Caroline McElnay 
Copy to: 
Ian Town 
From: 
Harriette Carr 
1982
Subject: 
Day 12 PCR testing of close contacts 
Act 
For your: 
Action   Decision  
 
 
Background 
There is an urgent need for the Ministry to confirm in writing today whether close contacts of cases 
now require a negative day 12 swab before release from quarantine. All PHUs need to know as soon 
as possible as some close contacts of the Auckland cluster are now nearing 12 days since last 
Information 
exposure with a case while potentially infectious. 
Currently there is little evidence internationally that other countries have implemented this (partly due 
to the current state of COVID-19 within other countries). 
The NZMN network considered this from a lab perspective and suggested that asymptomatic close 
Official 
contacts should be tested at day 12:  the 

To provide consistency with MIF testing of incoming travellers 

Makes more sense that some other testing currently performed (population at higher risk) 

Low volumes, so wouldn’t be a huge pressure on labs 

Note however that how/where these people will be tested may be an issue (e.g. for rural 
communities) if these people are not also in MIF or a specific local solution is not in place 
under 
(e.g. one dedicated clinic or testing site).  

The opportunity to add alternative swabbing was also raised. 
 
At a meeting between members of the previous Public Health TAG subgroup, ARPHS and MOH, there 
was support in principle for day 12 testing of some or all close contacts. However, it was noted that 
testing volumes for close c
Released ontacts may not actually be low, and it could be quite complicated. There 
were also questions raised about whether this would be enforceable. 
There was agreement that different types of close contacts are at different levels of risk. In particular, 
household close contacts are at particularly high risk and should be tested. If there is a need to 
prioritise close contact testing this is where efforts should be concentrated. Day 12 testing of close 
contacts outside of the household level could be based on an assessment of risk on a case by case 
basis. For example, if transmission is seen in a workplace, day 12 testing should extend to all workers 
there. 
However, there was some concern that having different recommendations for different types of close 
contacts may create confusion (among different types of close contacts, and for those making case 
by case decisions about testing). Any decision will need to be clearly communicated. 
 
 

Document Two
 
 
Further consultation was undertaken with the clinical leads for both Homecare Medical and NITC (20 
August) who affirmed that it could be difficult with the current outbreak to identify different classes of 
close contacts aside from household close contacts but could potentially be done. 
ARPHS has subsequently (20 August)  indicated that they will be advising all close contacts identified 
as part of the current outbreak to undertake a day 12 test. 
 
Summary 

A decision needs to be communicated today as to whether close contacts of cases now require a 
negative day 12 swab before release from quarantine. All PHUs need to know as soon as possible as 
some close contacts of the Auckland cluster are now nearing 12 days since exposure. 
The recommended advice is that Day 12 testing of close contacts is recommended for those at 
1982
highest risk of exposure: 
a) all household close contacts 
Act 
b) others as determined by the local Medical Officer of Health e.g. when there are multiple cases at 
an institution or work premises. 
For this current outbreak, the local Medical Officer of Health is recommending under b) above that all 
close contacts are tested at day 12 due to the difficulty categorising levels of contact for this 
particular outbreak. 
 
Information 
If agreed, we will communicate this to ARPHS, other PHUs, NITC, Healthline, and CBG (who are also 
undertaking daily monitoring of close contacts) along with relevant internal teams and update the 
website accordingly.  
At this stage, we are not proposing any extension to the quarantine period for close contacts if they 
refuse day 12 testing. We will strongly encourage day 12 te
Official sting in communications with close 
contacts as providing an added level of assurance for them and their family and community, however, 
unless there is cause for public health concern (eg that a person may not be disclosing symptoms) 
the 
there would not be any enforcement of the recommendation. A suggested script offering day 12 
testing and the benefits of it is being developed by NITC and ARPHS and will be shared with other 
agencies involved in daily monitoring of close contacts. 
under 
Recommendations 
It is recommended that you: 
1.  agree 
Day 12 testing of close contacts is recommended for those at highest risk of 
Yes/No 
exposure: 
a) all household close contacts 
Released 
b) others as determined by the local Medical Officer of Health e.g. when there 
are multiple cases at an institution or work premises. 
 
2.  note 
For the current Auckland based outbreak, the local Medical Officer of Health has 
Yes/No 
recommended all close contacts have a day 12 test 
3.  note 
The decision will be communicated to ARPHS, PHUs, NITC, Homecare Medical, 
Yes/No 
CBG, and relevant internal teams 
 
Signature  ___________________________________________   
Date: 
Name 
Title