This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'ACC Settlement Policy'.

Payments Outside Scope of Statutory Entitlements 
 
Policy v3.0
Summary
2.0 Serious service failure
Service failures can occur when:
Objective
Payments outside the scope of statutory entitlements are pay-
• a client’s entitled to a payment, but for some reason this 
ments made by ACC to manage potential liabilities under Crown 
wasn’t identified early enough
Entities Act 2004, Section 17. These payments were previously 
• the client isn’t entitled to a payment but we’ve incor-
referred to as ‘wrongful action’ or ‘ex-gratia’ payments.
rectly advised them they are.
This page provides information on:
Both of these scenarios result in a loss for the client. If 
they request payment from what they see as a service 
• criteria required for a client to be paid outside ‘the scope of 
failure, we need to see if this can be resolved through 
statutory entitlement’
statutory entitlements.
• what defines a serious service failure
• what defines a financial loss
See AC Act 2001, Section 69
• how we compensate the client
A serious service failure requires more than a simple 
Please note that privacy breaches are not addressed through 
omission or delay. It requires ACC to have fallen well 
this process. All enquiries around privacy breaches and poten-
below reasonable service standards. The following cri-
tial compensation must be addressed through the Privacy 
teria normally should be met when considering if a se-
Team.
rious service failure has occurred:
For information on payments for backdated weekly compen-
• there’s serious failure by ACC to do so something that 
sation, go to 'Backdated Weekly Compensation' process group 
was a legislative requirement or an error in the way 
folder under: Claims Management> Manage Client Payments > 
something was done
Operational Policies > Weekly Compensation > in Promapp.
• the failure falls outside the scope of a normal rectifiable 
human error (serious error is negligent and risks putting 
If we consider issuing a decision to decline weekly compen-
ACC under threat of law liability).
sation after a review/appeal or a settlement has indicated that 
weekly compensation should be paid, then this case must be re-
ferred to the Weekly Compensation Panel to:
3.0 Measurable financial loss
As well as a serious service failure occurring, a client 
• check that the decision made to decline was robust
must be able to demonstrate that due to ACC’s service 
• recommend whether a payment outside the scope of statutory 
failure they experienced a measureable financial loss. 
entitlement should be considered (if appropriate).
This could include:
Owner
Cheryl Gall
• income that could have been earned from a rightful 
entitlement that’s been delayed due to ACC’s inaction, 
Expert
Cheryl Gall
payment of interest on late payment of weekly compen-
sation does not apply
Policy
• additional costs incurred by the client whilst trying to get 
their entitlement
1.0 Criteria for payments outside the scope of sta-
• incorrect advice provided by ACC that resulted in a 
tutory entitlements
financial commitment for the client
• ACC committing to pay for something with no entitle-
For a payment to be made outside the scope of statutory 
ment.
entitlements, the following criteria must be met:
• ACC committed a serious service failure, and
• the client experienced a measurable financial loss be-
cause of ACC’s actions.
If you receive a payment request that can’t be resolved 
through statutory entitlement, and ACC runs risk of court 
action due to the service failure, you should refer the 
matter to your a Technical Specialist. The delegation to 
approve a payment in excess of $2,000 or to reject a re-
quest is made on the recommendation of a Technical 
Specialist.
ACC > Claims Management > Manage Claims > Operational Policies > Managing Claims at ACC > Claim management  > Payments Outside Scope of Statutory Entitlements
Policy
Uncontrolled Copy Only : Version 3.0 : Last Edited Thursday, November 14, 2019 1:53 PM : Printed Tuesday, 2 June 2020 3:21 PM
Page 1 of 3

4.0 Reimbursement of bank fees
NOTE Example: Rest home costs incurred
 
This is a common issue considered as a payment outside 
The client fractured her hip 2004. This year she 
the scope of legislation. The following provides infor-
returned to hospital for removal of rods. Prior to 
mation how to manage these cases:
her discharge a needs assessment was com-
pleted. The assessor recommended 7 hours 
• If a client receives bank fees due to a delay in ACC 
home help and 10 hours attendant care assis-
paying an entitlement (eg weekly compensation) this is a 
tance per week.
failure in service. These cases wouldn’t be considered a 
‘serious error’ and therefore not meet criteria for payment 
Instead of returning home, the client was dis-
outside scope of statutory entitlement.
charged to a rest home. A short time later, ACC 
was advised that the client had died. ACC ad-
• Where a client incurs costs resulting from poor service, 
vised the client’s daughter, that ACC would pay 
the Branch manager can decide if a reimbursement is 
the rest home costs.
needed.
It had since been determined that there was no 
• Reimbursements should be made from the branch’s 
injury-related need for rest home care. However, 
operating budget, not against a claim file. To do this, the 
ACC had given a clear undertaking to the family 
branch manager needs to send a memo to Accounts 
that ACC would meet this cost.
Payable. They’ll need the amount, payee, and other rele-
vant details like the bank statement.
NOTE Example: Reimbursement for duplicate 
prescription receipt if ACC loses original
• Delegation for payments from the branch operating 
A client has sent their application for reim-
budget is covered in Delegations.
bursement of prescription fees to their case man-
ager. In turn, the case manager has sent the 
• Branch Managers should confirm if there’s additional 
application to the processing centre.
sign off needed (unlikely based on the usual amount but 
should be checked).
However, after three weeks of not hearing back 
from ACC the client contacts the case manager, 
who discovers the application cannot be found.
5.0 Specific claim examples
NOTE Example: Unlawful suspension of indepen-
The client now has to submit a new application. 
dence allowance
When they go to the pharmacy to get a duplicate 
of their original receipt the pharmacy charges 
In Stewart (337/2004), the District Court found 
them a fee for the duplicate.
that ACC couldn’t suspend entitlement to the 
independence allowance on medical grounds 
This fee is not a prescription cost, but a cost in-
without going through the statutory indepen-
curred by the client due to ACC having lost the 
dence allowance reassessment process.
original application. ACC will then reimburse for 
the prescription fee as well as the costs of ob-
QBE stopped paying the client’s independence 
taining the duplicated receipt.
allowance entitlement in 2005 without going 
through the proper process. This alone consti-
tuted a serious error. However there was also 
the issue about whether or not this decision 
should have been made in the first place. There 
6.0 How to pay the client - the submission
was a wealth of medical information supporting 
If you identify a case where there has been a serious ser-
the client’s on-going incapacity being related to 
vice failure resulting in a quantifiable loss to the client, a 
the original covered injury. However his entitle-
submission for ‘payment outside the scope of statutory 
ments were suspended on the basis of a file 
entitlements’ should be prepared.
review.
The submission needs to include:
The case met the criteria in relation to serious 
error despite the decision having originally been 
• amount the client is seeking
made by a private insurer. Once QBE files were 
• details surrounding the claim
handed back to ACC, the Corporation was ob-
• alleged errors ACC made
liged to notify the insurer of any liabilities within 
• quantified losses incurred by the client.
20 days of becoming aware of them. As that 
timeframe had passed ACC was now liable for 
For amounts under $2,000 the submission is referred to 
any payment outside the scope of statutory 
the Unit Manager to approve.
entitlements due.
In regards to the quantifiable loss this was calcu-
For amounts over $2,000 the submission is referred to 
lated on the basis of the interest from the date of 
the Technical Services team for consideration and 
suspension of the independence allowance to 
submission to the delegation holder.
the date it was reinstated.
ACC > Claims Management > Manage Claims > Operational Policies > Managing Claims at ACC > Claim management  > Payments Outside Scope of Statutory Entitlements
Policy
Uncontrolled Copy Only : Version 3.0 : Last Edited Thursday, November 14, 2019 1:53 PM : Printed Tuesday, 2 June 2020 3:21 PM
Page 2 of 3

7.0 Making the payment
 
Once written approval’s been given, the Case Manager 
needs to:
1) send a letter to the client advising them of the deci-
sion, noting that as it is a decision outside the scope of 
statutory entitlements, review rights do not apply
2) create a purchase approval in EOS, using the fol-
lowing details:
• Client or representative (in [Vendor] field)
• Entitlement code WA02
• One month from now (in [To Date] field)
• Amount to be entered as directed by Manager/Technical 
Services (In Unit Price field)
3) email the Unit Manager/Delegation Holder contact (de-
pending on amount) to request authorisation of the pur-
chase order
4) complete an ACC161 Proforma invoice form, once the 
authorisation’s been given
5) forward ACC161 to the local payments centre for 
processing. Refer to Who processes client reimburse-
ments.
6) check a week later to make sure the payment’s re-
ceived by the client and if not, follow up with payments 
team.
ACC161 Proforma invoice form
Who Processes Client Reimbursements Policy
ACC > Claims Management > Manage Claims > Operational Policies > Managing Claims at ACC > Claim management  > Payments Outside Scope of Statutory Entitlements
Policy
Uncontrolled Copy Only : Version 3.0 : Last Edited Thursday, November 14, 2019 1:53 PM : Printed Tuesday, 2 June 2020 3:21 PM
Page 3 of 3