This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Request for the 2017 Review of the Public Transport Spine Study'.
Excerpts from Agendas and Meeting Minutes. 
 
Alliance board agenda 26 September 2017 
Item 4: Mass transit report  
WSP was commissioned to undertake a review of the mass transit corridors. A preliminary 
draft report was received in late August, and officers provided comments and requested some 
additional detail to be provided.  
A revised draft report is due to be received from WSP on 22 September. We intend to 
circulate that report, together with a summary, ahead of the 26 September Board meeting.  
We have invited 9(2)(a)
 from WSP to attend the Board meeting and 
1982
provide a brief presentation on the work, with a focus on the following issues:  
•  What is the best MRT route and why?  
•  Is this route the same for LRT and BRT?  
Act 
•  How difficult is it to transition from BRT to LRT?  
•  What are the demand/capacity triggers that would require a move to MRT, and how do 
these relate to the Wellington situation?  
•  Development pathways for bus and LRT-based MRT (s we discussed in our last 
meeting).  
 
At the 19 September Governance Group meeting, it was agreed that the scenario descriptions 
should make specific reference to future mass transit (which could include light rail) and refer 
to demand and capacity triggers, and show how mass transit would interact with other 
interventions.  
 
Information 
We expect that the WSP work (and the issues outlined above) will help us to prepare this 
material. 
 
Alliance Board Meeting minutes, 26 September 2017 
Mass Transit Report  
Official 
9(2)(a)
 from WSP made a brief presentation on the conclusions of 
their report “Wellington Mass Transit Independent Review”, which had been previously 
circulated.  
 
the 
The following points were raised in discussion:  
•  In general, there is a need to draw sharper conclusions which draw out the information 
in the body of the report, especially in relation to demand, mass transit development 
pathways, and what are able to do in the short term ahead of the first trigger point.  
 
under 
Governance Group Agenda, 17 October 2017 
Item 3: Mass transit report  
WSP was commissioned in late June to undertake an independent review of mass transit 
corridors in Wellington. A preliminary draft report was received from WSP in late August, and 
staff met with WSP to review the draft and identify areas where further detail is required.  
 
A revised draft was presented to the Alliance Board on 25 September, and a further draft 
incorporating response to comments and questions raised at that meeting has now been 
received. We have requested some further corrections to that draft and a final report is 
expected to be available within the next week.  
Released 
 
The executive summary and conclusions from the most recent draft are attached (Attachment 
A). We do not expect these to materially change as a result of the final amendments that have 
been requested. A copy of the full report will be made available to the Governance group once 
the final version is received.  
 
The key conclusions from the report are:  

•  The public transport spine route recommended in the previous PT Spine Study (from 
the railway station to Newtown and Kilbirnie/Airport) is the best performing route for 
mass transit (either LRT or BRT)  
•  The pathway for implementation of mass transit is currently aligned towards a BRT 
end state. The forecast patronage and associated transport benefits do not, of 
themselves, indicate that a case could be made for investment in LRT, but land 
development and property benefits could be significant  
•  There is a significant imbalance between forecast patronage on the Golden Mile n 
dares to the south of the Basin Reserve. This may require a staged approach to 
investment.  
•  Transitioning from BRT to LRT on the same alignment is difficult due to cost and 
1982
service disruption. However, the future mass transit development pathway should 
remain flexible to take advantage of future technology changes and new innovations.  
•  The short to medium term future should be a continual upgrading of the existing  Act 
corridor to optimise service patterns and provide more segregated running for buses. 
Monitoring of passenger growth and land use development will identify the triggers for 
transition to mass transit (likely to be in the next 10-15 years based on forecast growth 
in demand).  
 
This work suggests that the Let’s Get Wellington Moving implementation plan should include a 
development pathway for mass transit which identifies the key investment trigger points, 
including a decision on mass transit mode. Note that a decision on mode does not need to be 
made immediately: the WSP report indicates that the demand projections suggest that the 
need for a full mass transit investment is still some time off. The development pathway should 
therefore enable progress to be made on establishing a segregated bus corridor, with a 
Information 
decision point on a full mass transit investment dependent on patronage growth and capacity.  
 
For the upcoming engagement phase, it is proposed that we summarise these conclusions, 
and note that the possible future mass transit development pathways differ between scenarios 
as follows: LGWM Governance Group Agenda – 17 October 2017 Page 6 of 10  
 
•   Under Scenario A, any future investment in mass transit would be constrained by the 
lack of any additional capacity for mass transit vehicles through Mt Victoria, and the 
Official 
need for mass transit vehicles to mix with general traffic at the Basin Reserve.  
•  Scenarios B, C and D each provide additional capacity through Mt Victoria and along 
Ruahine Street which could be dedicated to mass transit; and separation of public 
the 
transport from general traffic at the Basin Reserve. A mass transit development 
pathway (either LRT or BRT) is therefore possible under each of these scenarios.  
 
Governance Group Minutes, 17 October 2017 
 
under 
Mass transit report  
The Executive Summary and Conclusions of the consultants draft report were discussed. The 
Alliance Director noted that the final report was subject to some further edits and is expected 
to be finalised later in the week. It will be circulated to members once available.  
There was discussion on whether the Executive Summary was sufficiently clear on the steps 
that need to be taken. While the key conclusions are included in the report, the key 
recommendations and pathway forward could be expressed more sharply in the Summary.  
 
There was agreement that the engagement material should highlight the key conclusions from 
the report in relation to the need to identify a pathway to mass transit, which includes the 
Released 
triggers for future investments (related to demand and urban development).  
 
AGREED:  
a) That the Alliance Director liaise with WSP to finalise the report and that it be 
circulated to the Governance Group once available  
b) That the engagement material refer to the key conclusions in the report and the 
need to establish identify a pathway to mass transit within the scenarios  
c) That WSP be invited to present the report as part of the engagement process 
 
WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY 
DOCUMENT TITLE // 2 
 

Alliance Board Agenda, 26 October 2017 
Mass Transit report  
Following discussion of the draft WSP report at the Governance Group on 17 October, we 
have asked WSP to make some final amendments to the report to ensure that the summary 
and conclusions are clear. The final report is expected this week.  
We have also discussed the possibility of WSP being available during the public engagement 
phase to present their findings to the stakeholder groups who were involved in the early 
stages of the work, and other interested groups. Subject to Board approval, we will make 
arrangements for this in late November. 
 
1982
Alliance Board Meeting Minutes, 26 October 2017 
Alliance Director’s Update 
Act 
• The Alliance Director spoke to his report and noted the receipt of the final WSP report, and 
that arrangements were being made to have WSP present to meet with stakeholders during 
the engagement phase. 
Information 
Official 
the 
under 
Released 
WAKA KOTAHI NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY 
DOCUMENT TITLE // 3