This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Correspondance about NZDF related graffiti'.



 
 
19 June 2019 
 
 
Sarah Atkinson 
FYI 
 
 
Dear Sarah 
 
 
Thank you for your request made under the Local Government Official Information and 
Meetings Act 1987 (the Act),  received on 23 May 2019. You requested the following 
information: 
 
1.  Please provide me all correspondence in 2019, to and from the council about 
graffiti, including stencils, posters, chalk, placards and stickers, relating to the 
NZDF. To avoid confusion, this includes graffiti mentioning the ongoing inquiry into 
Operation Burnham, the NZSAS, Geoffrey Palmer, Tim Keating, and the NZSAS 
raid on a village in Afghanistan. 

 
2.  Please also provide any information you hold relating to the poster on Molesworth 
Street on Wednesday 22 May, which referred to the inquiry as a circus. 
 
3.  Please provide any policies and internal guidance relating to graffiti. Please include 
any changes to the policies made in the last two years. To avoid confusion, this 
would include temporary directions, such as ones relating to graffiti about the 
Christchurch white supremacist terror. 

 
In regards to your first two questions, the Wellington City Council does not have any 
correspondence relating to graffiti about NZDF, we also have no information relating to the 
post on Molesworth Street. 
 
In line with section 17(b) of the Act; I refuse these parts of the request as the information 
does not exist. 
 
In response to your third question, I have attached our Graffiti Management Plan which 
aims to ensure graffiti vandalism is managed consistently across the Council. 
 
Our main contractor has a standard response time of 3 days for non-offensive graffiti, and 
4 hours for offensive graffiti (within business hours). 
The only changes we have made in the last 2 years are the temporary changes regarding 
the positive messaging following the shootings in Christchurch. 
 
 


In recognition of the tragic events in Christchurch, we decided to ask our contractors to 
leave positive messaging in the public realm until we created a wall of remembrance. We 
encouraged people to show their support through signs, banners and flags and developed 
the Wall of Aroha on the Civic Square side of the Town Hall where people could leave 
supportive messages in chalk.  
 
Right of review 
 
If you disagree with my decision you have the right, under section 27(3) of the Act, to ask 
the Ombudsman to review and investigate my decision. Further information is available on 
the Ombudsman website, www.ombudsman.parliament.nz.  
 
Thank you again for your request 
 
 
Regards, 
 
 
 
 
Ana Nicholls 
Assurance Advisor 
Wel ington City Council   |   2 of 2