I will come back tomorrow regarding the next roll out but am very keen to move on to a more structured for of organising as proposed in our email with the table.

FYI parking is fine with 4 cars at Allen or Tennyson if you want that option. Whichever you prefer. Which means both option 1 or 3 are fully approved to pursue.

 

T

 

Tom Pettit Senior Analyst   |  Strategy Wellington City Council P 04.803.8697 | M 021.227.8697 E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |

The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

 

 

From: Tom Pettit
Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 10:46 a.m.
To: 'Phil Burgess'

Cc: Erik Zydervelt; Baz Kaufman; Finn Lawrence; Moana Mackey

Subject: RE: Car share next steps

 

Ah yes have seen that.  That map does not address the area immediately adjacent to the two spots in question.

 

Given we’re under the gun, all WCC had to go on was the below from Brendan via Finn sent in May:

TR53 Balance/ Maginnity St - Limited LV supply for a single x60A charger (13.5kW max) in the area will be in the order of $20k

 

That is ample power for 2x3.3kw chargers as you have on the waterfront.

 

My suggestion is you take up Balance and Willeston in the 2-car format as you suggested was acceptable Mar 28^th. We can’t move either for several reasons.

 

I have begged and pleaded to get one additional TR of capacity, which has been awarded. That would allow us to do 2 cars on Allen’s northwestern corner.

 

That would mean reaching your 33 car goal. However, if you do not like Ballance for some reason, you could do 3 cars at Allen and I can check with Parking if we can add a 4^th car at Allen or Tennyson to fulfil your quota?? Alternatively we could nix Balance, do a third car at Allen and focus on getting you allocation at Clifton, which can happen anytime since it is off-street.

 

Note on timelines I’ve spoken to traffic and the re-consulted spaces will be ready on the same timeline as a full TR. That means Victoria and Bolton ready late September. Willeston and Ballance can be done earlier, ideally mid to late August(there are no Council meetings in July to vote on your TRs).

 

Please let me know what preferred configuration you want by 1:

 

Option 1:

2x Willeston

2x Balance

2x Allen

Net Mevo Vehicles: 39 including waterfront

 

Option 2(Subject to NZTA/parking approval):

2x Willeston

3x Allen

3x Clifton

Net Mevo Vehicles: 41 including waterfront

 

Option 3(Subject to parking approval – 4 in one location 3 in the other):

2x Willeston

3 or 4x Allen

3 or 4x Tennyson

Net Mevo Vehicles: 39 including waterfront

 

You are also welcome to install the third spaces at both Willeston and Ballance but that is up to you given the costs and benefits to Mevo.

 

Cheers,

Tom

 

Tom Pettit Senior Analyst   |  Strategy Wellington City Council P 04.803.8697 | M 021.227.8697 E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |

The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

 

 

From: Phil Burgess [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 10:23 a.m.
To: Tom Pettit
Cc: Erik Zydervelt; Baz Kaufman; Finn Lawrence; Moana Mackey
Subject: Re: Car share next steps

 

Hi Tom,

Great update yesterday with Victoria and Bolton 

 

Please find Erik's image screenshot below and jpg as attached, of Ballance street - Let me know if it is still being rebellious loading on your side

 

Cheers

 

Phil 

 

 

 

 

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Tom Pettit <[email address]> wrote:

Hi Erik,

The attachment is 2kb and doesn’t load. Is it a picture or a pdf or ?

 

T

 

Tom Pettit Senior Analyst   |  Strategy Wellington City Council P 04.803.8697 | M 021.227.8697 E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |

The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

 

 

From: Erik Zydervelt [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 9:28 a.m.
To: Tom Pettit
Cc: Baz Kaufman; Finn Lawrence; Moana Mackey; Phil Burgess
Subject: Re: Car share next steps

 

 

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 at 9:24 AM, Tom Pettit <[email address]> wrote:

Hi Erik,

 

Nothing attached?

T

 

Tom Pettit Senior Analyst   |  Strategy Wellington City Council P 04.803.8697 | M 021.227.8697 E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |

The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

 

 

From: Erik Zydervelt [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 9:22 a.m.
To: Tom Pettit
Cc: Baz Kaufman; Finn Lawrence; Moana Mackey; Phil Burgess

Subject: Re: Car share next steps

 

Hi Tom

I believe we have met all action points outline in our last meeting. 

 

Regarding Ballance St, please see below notes from WE which is why I requested looking into moving the Ballance St locations to the other side of Maginnity.

 

Cheers

Erik

 

 

 

 

On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 at 8:52 AM, Tom Pettit <[email address]> wrote:

Hi Erik,

 

Cheers. Please recognize we can’t accommodate any requests after 1pm.

 

I will own up to a mistake by the way, I suggested College when I had your priority list sitting in front of me. I will suggest alternatively the 2 morst northwestern spaces on Allen St.

As for Ballance – it does have power. Where do you get the idea it does not?

 

Cheers,

Tom

 

Tom Pettit Senior Analyst   |  Strategy Wellington City Council P 04.803.8697 | M 021.227.8697 E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |

The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

 

 

From: Erik Zydervelt [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 June 2017 5:48 p.m.
To: Tom Pettit
Cc: Moana Mackey; Baz Kaufman; Finn Lawrence; Phil Burgess

Subject: Re: Car share next steps

 

Hi Tom

 

Thank you for the note. I will come back to you more comprehensively on this tomorrow or the next day (sorry conference). 

 

One thing jumps out, however, how did you go with finding out about moving the Williston and Ballance locations so that they could be grouped in three angled parks? 

 

As they currently stand, Ballance does not have power, however, we requested you look into the locations just on Ballance but the three parks on the other side of Maginnity St. 

 

Additionally, Williston requires significant trenching including across a driveway while there are three perfect angled parking spaces with very little trenching required immediately after the diplomatic parks. Can we move these as we have done with Victoria and Bolton?

 

Many thanks

Erik

Erik Zydervelt

Mevo Co-founder // CEO

+64 20 4059 1485  | [email address]  | www.mevo.co.nz | LinkedIn | Skype: erikzydervelt |

 

 

CAUTION: This email message and attachments are confidential to Mevo Limited and may be subject to legal privilege or copyright. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender immediately and destroy the message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, distribution, amendment, copying or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. 

ᐧ

 

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Tom Pettit <[email address]> wrote:

Hi guys,

 

Our legal advice has come back and we can go forward with the changes at Victoria and Bolton – but we need to re-consult on the changes in a targeted consultation. This will be quicker than the full TR process I think but I need to clarify that with our traffic team. I will let you know when we have a date for when this can happen. Our Traffic team has indicated they can handle 9 consultation processes, including these two.

For the seven confirmed requests, here are the bays I have marked out:

1.    Tennyson – 3 easternmost bays on south side of angled parking section.

2.    Oriental Parade – 3 bays on north side immediately west of the mobility parks outside band Rotunda (we will not change mobility parks)

3.    Kelburn Parade – 3 bays on west side immediately out front of 24 Kelburn Parade (P120s)

4.    Aro Street – 3 bays in the northern pocket that goes into Aro Park

5.    Roxburgh – 3 bays on west side north of the garage #3a (P60s)

6.    Tinakori – 3 bays on west side from north corner of Upton Tce.

7.    Tasman – Northernmost 3 consecutive bays that have power on east side.

 

Which brings you to 27, and 9 consultations.

 

Remember, we can still send the TRs for Ballance and Willeston to the committee at any time (their next meeting is in early August). I understand the separated spaces may not be ideal for you. As a result, may I recommend you go for the two dual spots in both locations as you requested us provide on 3/28? This would bring you to 31.

 

Which means we have to find two more spots. I can investigate if we can figure something out. In the past you have requested College. There is a two-pair that we’ve identified in the past that has power to it according to Wellington Electricity. This would be near your office and on a relatively calm road. Thoughts? At this stage we cannot look at any options that have not been scoped out by WE yet. This would total 33.

 

As to November we must focus on the immediate concerns for the moment and we can reconvene on those after we kick off this process this week.

 

I will note that if we are thinking ahead there are a couple of things you need to include in this that need addressing:

1.    Contract – WCC will author appropriate contract.

2.    Plans – Traffic will be requiring works/construction plans for each site to present the TRs to Council to ensure there are no hitches this round.

3.    Chargers –

a.    Worksafe must have approved your chargers before any installations

b.    WCC will confirm arrangement with 3kw/22kw before proceeding with WE and our other teams given overall CBD capacity restrictions

 

This is not a comprehensive list, just some topics to consider.

 

Cheers,

Tom

 

 

Tom Pettit Senior Analyst   |  Strategy Wellington City Council P 04.803.8697 | M 021.227.8697 E [email address] | W Wellington.govt.nz | |

The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are asked to respect that confidentiality and not disclose, copy or make use of its contents. If received in error you are asked to destroy this email and contact the sender immediately. Your assistance is appreciated.

 

 

 

From: Erik Zydervelt [mailto:[email address]]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 June 2017 3:23 p.m.
To: Moana Mackey
Cc: Baz Kaufman; Finn Lawrence; Phil Burgess; Tom Pettit
Subject: Re: Car share next steps

 

Hi all

 

Last but not least.

 

5. Tasman Street (north of Rugby St)

400V on east side only and has 60amp capacity available.

 

Look forward to your feed back. I'm in a conference tomorrow but around on Thursday. Sorry for the red here I'm on my phone in Auckland traffic. 

 

Kind regards

Erik

 

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 at 12:14 PM, Erik Zydervelt <[email address]> wrote:

Hi All

 

Here is WE's feedback on the first information request: 

1. Lower Marjoribanks (below Brougham) and Lower Roxborough St (Below Caroline)
   Lower Majoribanks St Northside 60amps no problem Lower Roxburgh St both sides Ok for 60amps
2. Lower Aro Street (from the shops down)
   Lower Aro St both sides has 400V 60amps available
3. Tinakori Rd (Hill St to Bowen Street)
   Tinakori Road most of 400V network on West side  60amps available
4. Marrion Street
   400V network both sides with 60amps available.

Kind regards

Erik Zydervelt

Mevo Co-founder // CEO

+64 20 4059 1485  | [email address]  | www.mevo.co.nz | LinkedIn | Skype: erikzydervelt |

 

 

CAUTION: This email message and attachments are confidential to Mevo Limited and may be subject to legal privilege or copyright. If you have received this email in error, please advise the sender immediately and destroy the message and any attachments. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any use, distribution, amendment, copying or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. 

ᐧ

 

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Erik Zydervelt <[email address]> wrote:

Good morning all

 

Thank you for your response Moana.

 

Immediate locations:

Regarding the four TR's that you are seeking legal council on, plus any potential supplementary spaces to make up the 7 locations / 21 spaces scheduled for approval earlier this month. I am receiving pressure from our chairman along with another key stakeholder and we (WCC and Mevo) need to become clear on when the delivery of the first spaces, where they are and when we can deploy vehicles. I am (as I believe you are) currently very unclear on this. 

 

While I appreciate it is complicated for WCC, if nothing else, it is very fair to request a date in which we can become clear on these facts so I can inform our other stakeholders. This is the first step towards this partnership's success (or failure) and will reflect both on Mevo and WCC's commitments to car sharing voiced very clearly by Councillors and the Mayor. 

 

Tasman Street/Hopper Street:

I have added this to the list with WE and will come back to you. Should there be energy supply, we are comfortable with your suggestion. 

 

September locations:

I have a followed up WE for the additional information we still need to obtain following my email yesterday and will do everything I can to have this to you by your requested time tomorrow. Following this, I will need a clear commitment from WCC about the number of spaces, locations and dates they will be available, of course, pending approval by the Councillors. 

 

We would like to see this at least meeting our EECA deadline, and bringing us to a total of 9 locations/27 spaces (an addition of 7 locations/21 spaces from today) by the 30th previously discussed. If we can have more vehicles down by this date it would be better as this is the very latest we can deploy these and any delays will put Mevo and this project in significant jeopardy. 

November locations: 

I do not appreciate this and find disappointing the continued and very mixed messages sent from the Council (as an organisation and a partner in this project). The opportunity we have presented was due to Mevo being more committed to car sharing in Wellington than other providers and taking the time and resources to source creative solutions in the unmetered parks in the CBD. On many occasions, we were told by WCC 'if you can find unmetered parking spaces that you are happy with, we are happy with them'. This is in addition to the direction we received from the Mayor. We did, and you were not. 

 

That aside, we would like to see these locations lined up for the November approval. Our EECA milestone has us deploying another 4 locations/12 spaces by the 30th of November in these spaces or other locations of a similar nature.

 

January locations:

This will see the completion of the Mevo/WCC/EECA project commitments. As reviewed and signed off by the Mayor and at that time Chair of the Transport Committee who was also unaware of the 30/70 split. We would like to see the final 4 locations/12 spaces made available by the 30th of January. 

 

Moving forward:

Can you please clearly articulate in the below table the commitments you are able to make so that we can plan our operations? I have included Mevo's commitments made to the people of Wellington along with the Central Government and other key stakeholders. We simply need to know clearly what WCC can commit to at this point:

 

Mevo & WCC EV Car Sharing Project
Commitments
Month	Spaces	Locations	WCC	Mevo
Immediate (WCC please advise)	x	TBC	Make available to Mevo the parking spaces meeting the requirements of an EV car share (pending Councillor approval)	Install charging infrastructure and make available vehicles for Mevo members
September	Summing to 21 spaces including immediate allocations above.	TBC	Make available to Mevo the parking spaces meeting the requirements of an EV car share (pending Councillor approval)	Install charging infrastructure and make available vehicles for Mevo members
November	Summing to 33 spaces including allocations above.	TBC	Make available to Mevo the parking spaces meeting the requirements of an EV car share (pending Councillor approval)	Install charging infrastructure and make available vehicles for Mevo members
January	Summing to 45 spaces including allocations above.	TBC	Make available to Mevo the parking spaces meeting the requirements of an EV car share (pending Councillor approval)	Install charging infrastructure and make available vehicles for Mevo members
Total	45 plus the 6 on the waterfront.

 

I look forward to your feedback and clarity. WE info to follow.