20 Viaduct Harbour Avenue Auckland 1010
Private Bag 92250, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
Ph 09 355 3553
1 May 2023
MB
[FYI request #22265 email]
Kia ora Mason,
The information you requested - CAS-706856-W4T3V8
Thank you for your request for information dated 26 March 2023 regarding ANPR data.
I will answer your questions in the order you have asked them.
Your ANPR database had 622 mil ion records of location data from the 179 ANPR cameras situated in
Auckland as of January 2023: OIA response CAS-677040-C1R9J9. When was the first entry to that 622
mil ion?
The first entry was on 01/06/2018 at 00:00:02.
It was stated in CAS-677040-C1R9J9 that the Police have been provided access 10 times since June 2021.
Please provide the (a) requested time frames; (b) the number of ‘hits’ disclosed; and (c) the authority cited
for disclosure, for each of those 10 requests.
NZ Police is not provided with “access”. The data is supplied to them upon request. Here is the breakdown:
No (a) Requested timeframe
(b) Number of
(c) Authority cited for
“Hits” disclosed
disclosure
1
From 06/05/2021 10pm to 07/05/2021 5:40am
0
2
Up to 21/05/2021
80
3
From 05/06/2021 to 14/06/2021
4
4
From 27/06/2021 to 29/06/2021
0
To support their criminal
investigations under a
5
Up to 30/08/2021
39
Police file number, which
6
From 01/02/2022 to 09/03/2022
4
was supplied for each
7
From 16/08/2020 to 15/07/2022
60
case.
8
On 05/11/2022
2
9
From 22/11/2022 to 2/12/2022
0
10 From 08/01/2023 7pm to 09/01/2023 3am
293
Please provide the total number of requests made by the Police and or external agencies to access the
Auckland Transport ANPR database.
Since June 2021, 10 requests have been made by NZ Police to AT, and al have been accepted.
AT.govt.nz
Please provide the total number of requests refused.
There are no requests that have been declined. Your request is therefore refused under Section 17 (e) of the
LGOIMA as the information does not exist.
Should you believe that we have not responded appropriately to your request, you are able to make a
complaint to the Office of the Ombudsman in accordance with section 27(3) of the LGOIMA and seek an
investigation and review in regard to this matter.
Yours sincerely
Roger Jones
Exec GM Business Technology
