Origins of Judaic SURNAME attached to our Godly given name.

Angela made this Official Information request to Department of Internal Affairs

Currently waiting for a response from Department of Internal Affairs, they must respond promptly and normally no later than (details and exceptions).

From: Angela

Dear Department of Internal Affairs,

Please can you advise the historical origins of attaching a JUDAIC Surname to the Christian given names of the children registered in New Zealand when we are a Christian nation with 1611 authorised Saint James bible as the law?

Please can Internal Affairs answer why practice from the Babylonian Talmud is used when constructing birth documents?
What is the origin of the practice?

Can Internal Affairs supply the documentation on the entire construction of the Birth Registration process, and who is responsible for recording names using dog latin instead of proper English grammar?

Who is the responsible party for the incorrect recording of the Birth Information?
Does the legislative Act being the 1993 Births deaths, marriages and Registration Act have a wet ink signature; letter patent from Queen Elizabeth ii?

Are the staff at Internal Affairs sworn to uphold statute?

Are the staff at Internal Affairs sworn to uphold [c.f] Crimes Act 1961 s240?

There were no legal names when my tipuna were here before the NZ company, when did the practice of attaching surnames begin in New Zealand?

Is the birth certificate the copyrighted property of the CROWN?

Why does the birth certificate get used for identification when it does not represent the living being holding it?

The donation of the living child was given by the parents to the NZ government in consideration for the benefits signed for by my dad, so was it a contract or a gift?

Is the BDM107a the tax receipt for the child?

Does attaching a surname to the Christian given names create a legal fiction in the NZ legislation, being the "person" in NZ legislation?

The attaching of the SURNAME is done in such a way as to appear ambiguous, assumed to be a certain way, in order to deceive, for the purposes of taxation, and creating a legal entity, yes or no?

Legal is based on a fiction, yes or no?

Christian given name = LOVE, yes or no?
SURNAME = WAR, yes or no?

A Surname brings WAR to an otherwise peaceable Christian man or woman, why is the DIA engaged in adding the spirit of WAR to mans existence in New Zealand via the Registrars?

Can you please advise why Registrars of New Zealand attach a SURNAME to the Christian given names of a child?

Can you please also advise the names, and dates of all of the Registrars of New Zealand that have been officially appointed since the birth registration process began?

Can you please advise the names and educational backgrounds of all of the Registrars from the Papakura District from 1967 onwards?

Can you please provide documentation on all of the organisations, individuals or governmental departments, Queen Elizabeth or any other entity who have ordered the bdm107a for whatever purpose since its creation?

Are the staff at BDM sworn to uphold Secret Commissions Act?
Are the staff at BDM sworn to uphold private acts that do not benefit the public?

Yours faithfully,

Angela

Link to this

From: SDO Official Correspondence
Department of Internal Affairs


Attachment image003.png
16K Download


Tēnā koe Angela,

 

Thank you for your enquiry to the Department of Internal Affairs in regard
to birth registration. The Department has released informational material
regarding known mis and disinformation in relation to birth certificates,
which may be of assistance:
[1]https://www.dia.govt.nz/Misinformation-a...

 

Some parts of your enquiry are requesting information that is not subject
to the Official Information Act or which is not held by the Department of
Internal Affairs. In some cases these questions appear to be based on
known false premises or to be associated with known belief systems such as
the Sovereign People’s Movement or Freemen on the Land movement. The
Department has not accepted these parts of your request and encourages you
to pursue your own independent research regarding the historical origins
of naming practice in society and to seek your own legal advice regarding
the operation of legislation in society. I have set out below the parts of
your request that the Department has not accepted as requests for official
information:

 

o Please can you advise the historical origins of attaching a JUDAIC
Surname to the Christian given names of the children registered in New
Zealand when we are a Christian nation with 1611 authorised Saint
James bible as the law?
o Please can Internal Affairs answer why practice from the Babylonian
Talmud is used when constructing birth documents? What is the origin
of the practice?
o There were no legal names when my tipuna were here before the NZ
company, when did the practice of attaching surnames begin in New
Zealand?
o who is responsible for recording names using dog latin instead of
proper English grammar?
o Does the legislative Act being the 1993 Births deaths, marriages and
Registration Act have a wet ink signature; letter patent from Queen
Elizabeth ii?
o Why does the birth certificate get used for identification when it
does not represent the living being holding it?
o The donation of the living child was given by the parents to the NZ
government in consideration for the benefits signed for by my dad, so
was it a contract or a gift?
o Is the BDM107a the tax receipt for the child?
o Does attaching a surname to the Christian given names create a legal
fiction in the NZ legislation, being the "person" in NZ legislation?
o The attaching of the SURNAME is done in such a way as to appear
ambiguous, assumed to be a certain way, in order to deceive, for the
purposes of taxation, and creating a legal entity, yes or no?
o Legal is based on a fiction, yes or no?
o Christian given name = LOVE, yes or no? SURNAME = WAR, yes or no? A
Surname brings WAR to an otherwise peaceable Christian man or woman,
why is the DIA engaged in adding the spirit of WAR to mans existence
in New Zealand via the Registrars?
o Can you please advise why Registrars of New Zealand attach a SURNAME
to the Christian given names of a child?

 

Some parts of your enquiry are seeking information that may be subject to
the Official Information Act, however these questions are not duly
particular, as is required under the Official Information Act. The
questions are ambiguous and the Department cannot clearly identify what
documents you are seeking. The Department invites you to clarify what you
are wanting in these cases, in order for these parts of your enquiry to be
accepted as Official Information Act requests. At this stage these parts
have not been accepted as Official Information Act requests.

 

o Can Internal Affairs supply the documentation on the entire
construction of the Birth Registration process
o Who is the responsible party for the incorrect recording of the Birth
Information?
o Are the staff at Internal Affairs sworn to uphold statute?

 

Some parts of your enquiry ask for information that would require
substantial collation and research to answer, which would be likely to
disproportionately impact the normal operation of the Department. These
parts of your request are accepted as Official Information Act requests,
but are refused under section 18(f) of the Official Information Act. The
requests that are refused are:

 

o Can you please advise the names and educational backgrounds of all of
the Registrars from the Papakura District from 1967 onwards?
o Can you please also advise the names, and dates of all of the
Registrars of New Zealand that have been officially appointed since
the birth registration process began?

 

Responding to these requests would require:

 

o the Department to identify all Registrars appointed to the role since
the function of registering births, deaths and marriages was
transferred to the Department from the Ministry of Justice in 1995
o review the Human Resources files of all those employees to determine
the district in which they worked, their education and any
qualifications

 

The Department is of the view that the above activities would
disproportionately impact the normal operation of the Department.

 

The Department is refusing your request for:

 

o Can you please provide documentation on all of the organisations,
individuals or governmental departments, Queen Elizabeth or any other
entity who have ordered the bdm107a for whatever purpose since its
creation?

 

Pursuant to section 9(2)(a) of the OIA. The BDM107A is a pre-adoptive
birth certificate. It is the original birth registration information prior
to an adoption occurring. Access to pre-adoptive birth certificates is
restricted to those named on the certificate, and certificates can in only
be accessed in specific circumstanced. Providing you with documentation of
all those who have applied for a pre-adoptive birth certificate would
disclose to you the fact that those individuals have been involved in an
adoption, a fact which is deeply personal for many people. It is therefore
necessary to withhold the information to protect the privacy of natural
persons.

 

The below parts of your request are able to be considered under the
Official Information Act 1982. This request has been logged by Department
as OIA 2122-0760, and the Department will provide its response to you
regarding these questions within twenty working days. The 20^th working
day is 8 June 2022.

 

o Are the staff at Internal Affairs sworn to uphold [c.f] Crimes Act
1961 s240?
o Are the staff at BDM sworn to uphold Secret Commissions Act?
o Are the staff at BDM sworn to uphold private acts that do not benefit
the public?
o Is the birth certificate the copyrighted property of the CROWN?

 

I trust that this information has been of assistance, and we await your
clarification to the questions as specified above.

 

Ngā mihi,

 

Louise Walton [2](she/her)

Advisor Official Correspondence

Te Pāhekoheko, Kāwai ki te Iwi | Operations, Service Delivery and
Operations
Te Tari Taiwhenua | The Department of Internal Affairs

[3]www.dia.govt.nz

[4]Logo-test

 

 

show quoted sections

Link to this

From: Angela

Dear SDO Official Correspondence,

Thank you for the answers you provided, I will provide further clarification in the following questions:

You state the BDM107a is a pre-adoptive certificate, does the state then take on the role of the legal parent in consideration for the family receiving benefits?

Where does the custom of registering of births derive and who was responsible for the implementation of the practice and any documentation pertaining to the construction of this practice, origins, and

Can you please provide documentation on all of the organisations,
individuals or governmental departments, Queen Elizabeth or any other
entity who have ordered the bdm107a excluding ADOPTIONS for whatever purpose since its
creation?
I would like BDM to collate a list of the organisations, including Queen Elizabeth ii, the Pope, or any other Agents or Principals of the CROWN who may have ordered one or other of the BDM107A, RG27, RG9 and any of the other short or long form birth certificates that do not pertain to adoptions for Maori and all other births for the years 1990, and 1999 and for what purpose did they order these please?

Can BDM please provide all the documentation and documented processes they have used to create the originating legislation and any legislation up until this day as it pertains to Registrations of living people, Adoptions, Births, Deaths, Marriages, Passports and Identity information, and the basis for the decisions made for attaching a JUDAIC custom and SURNAME?
All notes, correspondence and information related to the decision making process as it pertains to the creation of the legislation please.
Who wrote the legislation regarding births and deaths, and where did the idea originate from when writing the legislation and as it also pertains to registration of ships, from which culture and custom did this practice derive?

Can BDM please supply the probate files for all the Maori deaths from 1900-1930?
Can BDM please supply copies of all the birth certificates in short or long form of the Maori people from years 1888 until 1930 excluding any adoptions and also supply documentation on who have ordered a copy of any certificates for whatever purpose as they pertain to Maori in the years provided?

Can BDM please advise the numbers of individual tangatawhenua who have only the name "tangatawhenua" on their birth certificates and no other identifying information?

Can BDM please provide documentation on every BDM107a, RG9, RG27, and Printout that was ordered, photocopied, faxed, mailed or disseminated or sent out to any entity whatsoever for whatever purpose for the year 1968, 1990, 1999 that did not involve adopted natural persons, rather any persons, natural persons, organisations including the Queen or the Pope, any letter, correspondence or email that pertains to the creation of those documents please?

Yours sincerely,

Angela

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of Internal Affairs only: