This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Stats NZ's processing of a previous OIA request and its search for the information requested'.



From:
Stallah Valaau
To:
DICKEY Mike
Subject:
RE: Official Information request - Data Ethics Advisory Group
Date:
Wednesday, 9 March 2022 3:25:16 pm
Attachments:
image001.png
image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
image005.png
image006.png
Kia ora Mike,
Thank you so much for your reply. Quite a mystery this one but first wanted to check with your
team as we don’t want to leave any stone unturned before we respond. Thank you once again
for your help!
Ngā mihi
Stallah Valaau (pronouns: he/him/his)
Advisor – Executive and Government Relations, Office of the Government Statistician and Chief
Executive
Kaitohutohu – Tari O Te Kaitautauranga Matua Me Te Pouārahi Matua | Stats NZ | Tatauranga
Aotearoa
P O Box 2922, Wellington 6011 | ddi: +64 4 931 4838 |mob: +64 21 575 528 | stats.govt.nz
About Aotearoa, for Aotearoa
Data that improves lives today and for generations to come
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn
From: DICKEY Mike <[email address]> 
Sent: Wednesday, 9 March 2022 3:13 PM
To: Stallah Valaau <[email address]>
Subject: FW: Official Information request - Data Ethics Advisory Group
Good afternoon Stallah
Thank you for your email below in relation to an OIA request received from  the New Zealand 
Council for Civil Liberties (the Council) asking for ‘A copy of the discussion paper written for 
Customs NZ on the topic of security vs. transparency’.
This discussion paper is unable to be located  within Customs, and no one that should be aware 
of the paper is aware of it. 

I note that the attached letter from the Council dated 8 February 2022 states: ‘Stats NZ had done
some work with Customs NZ and written a discussion paper regarding the dimensions of Security
vs Transparency.’
May I suggest that Stats NZ have the Council confirm the basis of its thinking it was a discussion
paper written for Customs. It would seem however by the language used in the above paragraph
that Stats NZ wrote the paper.    
For your consideration.  Feel free to contact me if you have any queries in regard to the
aforementioned.
Ngā mihi  |  Kind regards
Mike
Mike Dickey, Senior Correspondence, Reviews and Ministerial Servicing Advisor - Kaitohutohu
Matua Kaupapahere | International and Governance |New Zealand Customs Service | PO Box 29
Auckland | AK City Customhouse   
From: Stallah Valaau <[email address]> 
Sent: Monday, 7 March 2022 15:20
To: OIA <[email address]>
Subject: re: Official Information request - Data Ethics Advisory Group
Kia ora koutou,
Hope this will find you safe and well.
Stats NZ has received an OIA for the following information:
a) A copy of the Martin Jenkins review of the Data Ethics Advisory Group
b) Copies of the agendas and minutes of all meetings held since October 2020
c) A copy of the discussion paper written for Customs NZ on the topic of security vs.
transparency
d) A list of all discussion papers written by the group since its formation, including the title of the
paper, date it was published, and agency that the paper was written for (if any)
Item c above (highlighted) refers to a ‘copy of the discussion paper written for Customs NZ on the
topic of security vs. transparency’. 
We’ve searched through all the advice published on our
website and cannot find this one. We also cannot locate this anywhere else within our systems
despite carrying out a thorough search. In saying this, we saw from a quick google search there
was a document released under another OIA request which includes a statement that “Stats NZ
had done some work with Customs New Zealand and written a discussion paper regarding the
dimensions of security vs. transparency.”
 – We assume this is what this request is based on,
though it does not appear to relate to the Data Ethics Advisory Group (it is under the item
heading ‘Data Ethics Principles’. Relevant links from google search below:  
https://fyi.org.nz/request/18491-stats-nz-discussion-paper-regarding-the-dimensions-of-




security-vs-transparency
https://fyi.org.nz/request/17682/response/69515/attach/4/2020%2005%2015%20RoM%20Stats
%20NZ%20NZSIS.pdf
I wonder if you would kindly provide us with a copy of this discussion paper. This information will
be used to help with our response to this OIA. If you can, we would greatly appreciate your early
response as we plan to reply to this OIA before the end of the week.
Ngā mihi
Stallah Valaau (pronouns: he/him/his)
Advisor – Executive and Government Relations, Office of the Government Statistician and Chief
Executive
Kaitohutohu – Tari O Te Kaitautauranga Matua Me Te Pouārahi Matua | Stats NZ | Tatauranga
Aotearoa
P O Box 2922, Wellington 6011 | ddi: +64 4 931 4838 |mob: +64 21 575 528 | stats.govt.nz
About Aotearoa, for Aotearoa
Data that improves lives today and for generations to come
Facebook | Twitter | LinkedIn
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott <[email address]>
Sent: Monday, 31 January 2022 3:31 PM
To: Info Mailin - Shared Mailbox <[email address]>
Subject: Official Information request - Data Ethics Advisory Group
Dear Statistics New Zealand,
I would like to make a request for the following information relating to the Stats NZ Data Ethics
Advisory Group:
ONE: A copy of the Martin Jenkins review of the Data Ethics Advisory Group
TWO: Copies of the agendas and minutes of all meetings held since October 2020
THREE: A copy of the discussion paper written for Customs NZ on the topic of security vs.
transparency
FOUR: A list of all discussion papers written by the group since its formation, including the title of
the paper, date it was published, and agency that the paper was written for (if any)
Yours faithfully,
Scott

Te Mana Ārai o Aotearoa, New Zealand Customs Service is a COVID-19 vaccinated
workplace. To meet our workplace safety requirements you will be asked to provide proof
of vaccination when you visit our offices.

The information contained in this email is intended for the addressees and is not
necessarily the official view or communication of the New Zealand Customs Service. 
This email may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you
received this in error, please:
a.  Reply promptly to that effect, remove this email and any replies from your system.
b.  Do not act on this email in any other way.