This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Auckland Harbour Bridge active modes decision'.




From:
s 9(2)
To:
Subject:
FW: AHB Shared Path - Alternative barrier opt on
( )
Date:
Friday, 16 July 2021 5:59:02 PM
Attachments:
image001.jpg
image008 jpg
image005 jpg
image006 jpg
image007.jpg
FYIs  ust an update
 
  9(2
Sensitivity  General
From: s 9(2)(a)
Sent: Friday, 16 July 2021 5 58 p m
To: s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz>
Subject: RE: AHB Shared Path - Alternative barrier option
 
His 9(2)(a)
 
1982
I have just completed the work, and I need to go through the assessment and outcomes with s 9(2)(as part of our verification process
 
Is it OK if we send you a formal response on Monday morning?
 
Just to give you an idea, it will make the restrictions on traffic, buses and pedestrian numbers better, but we don t think it is going to make the traffic restrictions significantly
ACT 
better, or even no restriction
 
We will get in touch on Monday morning to confirm
 
Regards
 
s 9(2)(a)
 
 
Sensitivity  General
From: s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz> 
Sent: Friday, 16 July 2021 3:48 p m
To: s 9(2)(a)
@beca com>
Subject: Re: AHB Shared Path - Alternative barrier option
 
Hi s 9(2)(a)
INFORMATION 
 
Could you please let me know if you will have this review completed today?  Thanks!
 
Cheers,
s 9(2)(a)
 
From: s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz>
Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 8:07 AM
To: s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz>; s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz>
OFFICIAL 
Subject: FW: AHB Shared Path - Alternative barrier option
 
FYI
 
From:
@asm nzta govt nz> 
s 9(2)(a)
THE 
Sent: Friday, 16 July 2021 8 00 AM
To: s 9(2)(a)
@beca com>
Cc: s 9(2)(a)
@beca com>; s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz>
Subject: AHB Shared Path - Alternative barrier option
 
Hi  s 9(2)(a)
 
Can you please assess review the steel barrier option below from a loading perspective? It looks like it doesn t need pins (although deflection may still be an issue)  If we could
UNDER 
use this instead of the concrete barriers, will this significantly change the heavy vehicles restrictions required? Just a high level overview will be ok at this stage
 
Thanks,
s 9(2)
 
s 9(2)(a)
Auckland System Management
Ms 9(2)
E
asm nzta govt nz /  w www nzta govt nz/asm 
__________ _________________________________________
RELEASED              
From: s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz> 
Sent: Friday, 16 July 2021 7 51 am
To: 
@asm nzta govt nz>
s 9(2)(a)
Cc: s 9(2)(a)
@resolvegroup co nz>
Subject: Alternative barrier option
 
Hi s 9(2)
 
See below  Equates to 360kg/lineal metre  
 


1982
ACT 
INFORMATION 
OFFICIAL 
THE 
UNDER 
 
 
 
RELEASED 
Get Outlook for Android 
NOTICE: This email, if it relates to a specific contract, is sent on behalf of the Beca company which entered into the contract  Please contact the sender if you are 
unsure of the contracting Beca company or visit our web page http://www beca com for further information on the Beca Group  If this email relates to a specific 
contract, by responding you agree that, regardless of its terms, this email and the response by you will be a valid communication for the purposes of that contract, and 
may bind the parties accordingly  This e-mail together with any attachments is confidential, may be subject to legal privilege and applicable privacy laws, and may 
contain proprietary information, including information protected by copyright  If you are not the intended recipient, please do not copy, use or disclose this e-mail; 
please notify us immediately by return e-mail and then delete this e-mail