Courtenay Place Assessment Form
Courtenay Place Do Minimum
Courtenay Place Option 1
Courtenay Place Option 2
Courtenay Place Option 3
Describe how Option 3
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide any commentary
Provide an explanation
would be affected if Tory
how the the scoring may
how the scoring may
Provide an explanation
how the the scoring may
how the scoring may
Provide an explanation
how the the scoring may
how the scoring may
Score
relevant to the do
A B
C
D
E
F
G
H Score of the rational behind
Street was opened to
change if loading bays were change if taxi's and loading A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H Score of the rational behind change if loading bays were change if taxi's and loading A B C D E
F
G
H
Score
of the rational behind change if loading bays were change if taxi's and loading
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
through movements only by
minimum.
the score.
to be retained on the
bays were to be retained on
the score.
to be retained on the
bays were to be retained on
the score.
to be retained on the
bays were to be retained on general traffic? How would
Golden Mile
the Golden Mile
Golden Mile
the Golden Mile
Golden Mile
the Golden Mile
this effect the criteria.
Taxis are a signficant issue for
Taxis are a signficant issue for
Removal of general traffic, and
bus side friction interaction,
bus side friction interaction,
Marginal decrease in travel
Taxis are a signficant issue for
improvements to signals
however they form an
Likely to slightly degrade
Removal of general traffic, and
Likely to slightly degrade
however they form an
Likely to slightly degrade
time and reliability from
bus side friction interaction,
provide significant
important part of the nighttime
IO - Bus Travel time and reliability
0
Slight increase in reliability and
journeytime, depending on
improvements to signals
journeytime, depending on important part of the nighttime
journeytime, depending on
additional signals, but probably
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
however they form an
0.25
0.15
0.35
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
2
0.5
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
2
improvement, however inline
economy. My be harder to
0.5
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
improved Journey time,
locaiton and configuration of
provide significant
locaiton and configuration of
economy. My be harder to
locaiton and configuration of
not a huge impact if traffic
important part of the nighttime
bus stops will introduce a
enforce and degrade
loading vehicles.
improvement.
loading vehicles.
enforce and degrade
loading vehicles.
movements limited to through
economy.
risk/problem particularly for
'exclusivity' of Courtenay for
'exclusivity' of Courtenay for
movements only.
NB buses.
buses. Significant risk with
buses.
reduced carriageway.
1982
Slight improvement to wait
times, with additional space
Significant improvement in
Significant improvement in
provided to both stops.
wait times, coupled with
wait times, coupled with
Side roads could be used for
Side roads could be used for
Side roads could be used for
Courtenay Place west (NB)
additional space for stop
additional space for stop
IO - Bus passenger boarding and alighting
dedicated uber pick up points
dedicated uber pick up points
dedicated uber pick up points
0
improved on both sides
infrastructure provided by
infrastructure. Stop placement
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
n/a
(similar to airport). Taxi's
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
3
(similar to airport). Taxi's
0.75 0.45 0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.63
2
n/a
(similar to airport). Taxi's
n/a
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
comfort and convenience
through addition of pavement
additional pavement and Blair
could be improved. Removal of
should be seperated from bus
should be seperated from bus
should be seperated from bus
space and closure of Blair
Closure. Removal of Courtenay
Courtenay West not considered
Act
stops whereever possible.
stops whereever possible.
stops whereever possible.
provides significant
West not considered a huge
a huge issue. Rounded down
improvement to Courtenay
issue. Rounded up from 2.5.
from 2.25.
East.
n/a
Turn conflicts removed.
Negative impact if within
Multiple lanes of buses vs peds
Likely lower score subject
Likely lower score subject
IO - Pedestrian safety
0
Subject to location of taxi
Likely lower score subject
Likely lower score subject
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Some general traffic
pedestrianised areas otherwise
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
-1
crossing and impaired
loading zone and taxi rank
-0.2 -0.2 -0.1 -0.6
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.21
2
Greater provision for
loading zone and taxi rank
Negligible change expected
0.4
0.4
0.2
1.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
ranks.
loading zone locations.
pedestrians. Single lane buses.
loading zone locations.
restrictions
negligible change.
pedestrians.
locations.
locations.
Improved footpath widths will Improvements to portions of
Improvements to portions of
Improved footpath widths will
Improved footpath widths will
Will reduce Level of Comfort
Will reduce Level of Comfort
Will reduce Level of Comfort
Will reduce Level of Comfort
Increase in ped delay due to
No changes to available
improve ped LoC, reduced
Courtenay Place footpath will Courtenay Place footpath will
improve ped LoC, reduced
improve ped LoC, reduced
IO - Pedestrian capacity
0
closer to Option 1 due to
closer to Option 1 due to
closer to Option 1 due to
closer to Option 1 due to
additional crossing. Little
footpath width or pedstrian
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
signal timings and
improve ped LoC and reduced improve ped LoC and reduced 0.2
0.2
0.35
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.18
2
signal timings and
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.36
2
signal timings and
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.36
reduced space available for
reduced space available for
reduced space available for
reduced space available for
change to pedestrian comfort
crossings
pedestrianised sideroad will
signal timings reduce
signal timings reduce
pedestrianised sideroad will
pedestrainised sideroad will
pedestrians
pedestrians
pedestrians
pedestrians
level
reduce pedestrian delays
pedestrian delays
pedestrian delays
reduce pedestrian delays
reduce pedestrain delays
significant additional areas of
vehicle frequency and space
vehicle frequency and space
side streets and other spaces
IO - Improve Place quality
0
Mimimal change to space
public space allow better
allocation would be a
allocation would be a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
would remain same score
would remain same score
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
generate better activation and
mimimal change
minimal change
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.19
3
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.57
allocation for public realm
comfort, security,
consideration - likely to reduce consideration - likely to reduce
connectedness
connectedenss
score - 2 maybe
score - 2 maybe
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.138
0.102
0.12
0.08
0.04
0.12
0.04
0.1632
1.4
0.19 0.15 0.2
0.02
0.056
0.168
0.056
0.2224
2.2
0.252
0.276
0.252
0.168
0.088
0.264
0.088
0.3504
Taxi stands on CP could
Taxi stands on CP could
improved public realm for day
Taxi stands on CP could
E - Social
0
greater PT efficiency but little
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
improve access for mobility
0.167 0.1667 0.1667
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.19
1
greater PT efficiency but little
improve access for mobility
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.19
3
& night, greater accessibility &
improve access for mobility
0.5001
0.5001
0.5001
0.3
0.3
0.5001
0.75
0.57
public realm effects
No change in score
impaired people to
public realm effects
No change in score
impaired people to
social opportunities. Greater No change in score
impaired people to
No change in score
E - Retail Impact Assessment
0
Noticeable decrease in area
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Increased foot traffic and
7 loading bays which are highly Based on the results from the 0.167 0.1667 0.1667
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.2
1
In addition to Option 1, two 7 loading bays which are highly Based on the results from the 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.2
1
Benefits from 75% more
7 loading bays which are highly Based on the results from the Score unchanged but increased 0.1667 0.1667 0.1667
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.2
character in Courtenay Place
pedestrian activity from 30%
utilised during weekdays. CP
loading bay survey, the 4 taxi
bus lanes in each direction
utilised during weekdays. CP
loading bay survey, the 4 taxi
footpath space with provision utilised during weekdays. CP
loading bay survey, the 4 taxi accessibility makes it a stronger
compared to other areas of the
more footpath space, however has the second most loading stands are occupied between 2-
would improve transport
has the second most loading stands are occupied between 2-
for bikes and scooters
has the second most loading stands are occupied between 2- '1'. Consider potential of Tory
GM (daytime). Already lower
loss of efficiency/higher goods zones. Retailers would face less 11% on weekdays and 1-5% on
networks, but no general traffic zones. Retailers would face less 11% on weekdays and 1-5% on
outweighs the same magnitude zones. Retailers would face less 11% on weekdays and 1-5% on Street being a promenade from
levels of pedestrian traffic and
damage/theft risk for
risk and receive goods faster if weekends. Utlisation of these
would limit access. However, risk and receive goods faster if weekends. Utlisation of these
of negative impacts from
risk and receive goods faster if weekends. Utlisation of these
Te Papa to War Memorial.
less desirable/secondary retail
businesses from relocation of loading bays were directly on
taxi stands are very low and
observed little private transit loading bays were directly on
taxi stands are very low and
Options 1 and 2. However,
loading bays were directly on
taxi stands are very low and
Information
outlets. Considering 'do
loading bays. Additionally, 2
the GM. Also, magnitude of
hence retaining them would
hence the impact of limited
the GM. Also, magnitude of
hence retaining them would
whether these changes are
the GM. Also, magnitude of
hence retaining them would
minimum', it would be
side streets would be
benefit is not expected to have
provide little benefit for
access could be marginal.
benefit is not expected to have
provide little benefit for
enough to enhance the area benefit is not expected to have
provide little benefit for
Negatively impacting on the
Negatively impacting on the
Negatively impacting on the
Negatively impacting on the
level of service but not
level of service but not
Score to move towards a "2" as Score to move towards a "2" as
No change in score.
No cycle facility but low speed
No dedicated cycle facility but
No dedicated cycle facility but
level of service but not
level of service but not
significant enough to change
significant enough to change
Provision of protected cycle
presence of loading bays may presence of loading bays may Intersection treatment may be
environment means most
improved cycle experience due
E - Cycling Level of Service
0
improved cycle experience due significant enough to change
significant enough to change
the score as the traffic volume the score as the traffic volume
facility significantly improve
require some service vehicles require some service vehicles
required but the improved
commuter cyclists are able to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.167 0.1667 0.1667
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.16
1
to the removal of general
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.16
3
0.5001
0.5001
0.5001
0.3
0.3
0.5001
0.3
0.48
to the removal of car parking, the score as a large number of the score as a large number of
is reducing due to removal of
is reducing due to removal of
the cycling level of service on
to travel to/from and
to travel to/from and
cycling level of service along
use Courtenay Place without
traffic, car parking, loading
loading zones and taxi stands.
car parks are still being
car parks are still being
general traffic and a large
general traffic and a large
Courtenay Place.
undertake unloading on the
undertake unloading on the
Courtenay Place can be
major barrier.
zones and taxi stands.
removed.
removed.
number of car parks are still
number of car parks are still
cycle facility.
cycle facility.
maintained.
being removed.
being removed.
Turn conflicts removed.
Slight reduction in score if
Slight reduction in score if
Bus v general traffic conflicts
Likely lower score subject
E - General Safety
0
Manoeuvre type crashes
kerbside loading zones retained kerbside loading zones retained
Likely lower score due to
Likely lower score due to
Likely lower score subject
Reduction in score due to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.167 0.1667 0.1667
0.5
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.19
0
Multiple lanes of buses.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
removed.
loading zone and taxi rank
0.3334
0.3334
0.3334
1
0.2
0.3334
0.2
0.38
potential removed with
due to manouevring type
due to manouevring type
manouevring type crashes.
manouevring type crashes.
loading zone locations.
conflicts remaining
Intersection conflicts reduced.
locations.
deletion of parking
crashes.
crashes.
Potentially significant
reduce the potential for
E - Sustainability
0
Continued PMV preference,
Minor improvement on key
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
mimimal change
minimal change
0.167 0.1667 0.1667
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.16
1
Minor improvement on key
mimimal change
minimal change
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.16
3
improvement on key
mimimal change
minimal change
significant sustianability
0.5001
0.5001
0.5001
0.3
0.3
0.5001
0.3
0.48
growth, and bus congenstion
sustinability criteria
sustinability criteria
sustinability criteria
improvement
Official
removal of traffic
Advantages of Option 2.
Some bus stops closer to
E - Fit with LGWM Programme
0
releases more green time to be
Also enables provision of a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
intersections and intersecting
mimimal change
minimal change
0.333 0.3334 0.3334
0.2
1
0.3334
0.2
0.2
3
mimimal change
minimal change
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.3
1.5
0.5001
0.3
0.3
2
mimimal change
minimal change
minimal change
0.3334
0.3334
0.3334
0.2
1
0.3334
0.2
0.2
allocated to north south public
separated cycling facility .
public transport routes
transport and non-motorised
Would be very challenging for
E TOTAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.1667
0.039 0.0389 0.0389 0.07333
0.1
0.0389
0.1
0.01833 1.1667
0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.1267 0.0389
0.1
0.016833333
2.33333
0.07779 0.07779 0.07779 0.14667 0.14667 0.07779
0.2
0.0385
DM&O - Delivery
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
No change in score
No change in score
-0.33
-0.333
-0.333
-0.333
-0.4
-0.333
-0.333
-0.4
-1
No change in score
No change in score
-0.33 -0.3 -0.33 -0.33
-0.4
-0.333 -0.333
-0.4
-2
No change in score
No change in score
No change in score
-0.666
-0.666
-0.666
-0.666
-0.8
-0.666
-0.666
-0.8
the
DM&O - Operations and Maintenance
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
No change in score
No change in score
-0.33
-0.333
-0.333
-0.333
-0.2
-0.333
-0.333
-0.55
-2
No change in score
No change in score
-0.67 -0.7 -0.67 -0.67
-0.4
-0.666 -0.666
-1.1
-3
No change in score
No change in score
No change in score
-0.999
-0.999
-0.999
-0.999
-0.6
-0.999
-0.999
-1.65
DM&O - Timeframe for Delivery
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
No change in score
No change in score
0.666
0.666
0.666
0.666
0.8
0.666
0.666
0.1
2
No change in score
No change in score
0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
0.8
0.666
0.666
0.1
2
No change in score
No change in score
No change in score
0.666
0.666
0.666
0.666
0.8
0.666
0.666
0.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0267
0
0
-0.0283
-0.333
-0.02
-0
-0.02 -0.02
0
-0.022 -0.0222 -0.046666667
-1
-0.0666
-0.0666
-0.0666
-0.0666
-0.08
-0.0666
-0.0666 -0.07833333
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.1667
0.2 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.15 2.2333
0.2 0 0.2 0 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.192567 3.53333
0.263 0.287 0.263 0.248 0.155 0.275 0.221 0.31057
under
Released
