Willis Street Assessment Form
Wil is Street Do Minimum
Wil is Street Option 1
Wil is Street Option 2
Wil is Street Option 3
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
Provide a description of
how the the scoring may
how the scoring may
how the the scoring may
how the scoring may
how the the scoring may
how the scoring may
A
B C D
E
F
G
H
Provide an explanation
change if loading bays
change if taxi's and loading A B C D
E
F
G
H
Provide an explanation
change if loading bays
change if taxi's and loading A B C D
E
F
G
H
change if loading bays
change if taxi's and loading A B C D
E
F
G
H
Provide any commentary
of the rational behind were to be retained on the bays were to be retained
of the rational behind were to be retained on the bays were to be retained
Provide an explanation of the were to be retained on the bays were to be retained
Questions
Score
relevant to the do minimum.
Score
the score.
Golden Mile
on the Golden Mile
Score
the score.
Golden Mile
on the Golden Mile
Score
rational behind the score.
Golden Mile
on the Golden Mile
Loading bays adjacent to stops
Removal of general traffic
Loading bays adjacent to stops
Slight decrease in JT, but significant Loading bays adjacent to stops
IO - Bus Travel time and reliability
What are bus travel times along each segment?
0
are a particualer issue on
provides significant benefiits
are a particualer issue on
improvement in reliability due to
are a particualer issue on
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Marginal improvements to
n/a
0.25 0.15 0.35
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
2
n/a
0.5
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
2
n/a
0.5
0.3
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
What the variance of travel time / reliabilty of services along the
travel time only.
Willis Street, due to the
to reliability in particular.
Willis Street, due to the
removal of general traffic.
Willis Street, due to the
segment?
interaction with bus stops.
Score rounced up from 1.5
interaction with bus stops.
Rounded up from 1.5.
interaction with bus stops.
What is the bus volume throughput along the segment?
SB bus stop is to far away from
Delay to bus customers much
bus stop on Lambton Quay, Loading bay adjenct to NB stop
Loading bay adjenct to NB stop
Stop location considered optimal of Loading bay adjenct to NB stop
IO - Bus passenger boarding and alighting
reduced, however stop
0
but marginal improvement in
is a particular problem,
is a particular problem,
the three options, as well as
is a particular problem,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
n/a
0.25 0.15
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
1
location (particularly SB)
n/a
0.25 0.15
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
2
n/a
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.42
comfort and convenience
space provides maringal
delaying buses access to the
delaying buses access to the
providng decreased wait time.
delaying buses access to the
degrades customer access and
How many passengers may be cleared from bus stops?
improvements. Score rounded
stop.
stop.
Rounded up from 1.75.
stop.
experience.
What is the wait time at buses?
up from 0.5.
How much bus stop crowding is there?
General traffic removed &
Negative impact if within
Subject to locations of loading Subject to locations of taxi
General traffic removed and
Subject to locations of loading Subject to locations of taxi
IO - Pedestrian safety
0
Subject to location of taxi
Mercer St closed which
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Side roads closed reduces
pedestrianised areas
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
1
zones - potential slight
ranks - potential slight
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
1
Mercer Street closed which reduces
zones - potential slight
ranks - potential slight
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.21
conflicts.
ranks.
removes ped v vehicle
otherwise negligible change.
reduction in score
reduction in score
ped vs vehicle conflicts.
reduction in score
reduction in score
What is the potential for pedestrian accidents to be reduced?
conflicts
Reduced signal timings will
Reduced signal timings will
No changes to available
No changes to available
1982
How many pedestrian crossing are along the corridor?
No changes to available
No changes to available
No changes to available
No changes to available
Reduced signal timings will reduce
IO - Pedestrian capacity
reduce pedestrian delays and
reduce pedestrian delays and
footpath width or signal times footpath width or signal times
What is the pedestrian delay per crossing?
0
No changes to available footpath width
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
footpath width or signal times footpath width or signal times 0.2 0.2 0.35 0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.18
1
footpath width or signal times footpath width or signal times 0.2 0.2 0.35 0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.18
2
pedestrian delays coupled with
0.4
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.36
How many pedestrian crossings are across the corridor?
or pedstrian crossings
no change to available foot
no change to available foot
assumed. Therefore score
assumed. Therefore score
assumed
assumed
assumed
assumed
some improved bus stop capacity
What is the pedestrian delay per crossing?
path
path
would change to 1
would change to 1
What is the level of footpath pedestrian density
What is the level of bus stop overspill?
Level of pedestrian amenity (using VURT)
primarily relates to Mercer St change (probably not enough change (probably not enough
primarily relates to Mercer St change (probably not enough change (probably not enough
change (probably not enough change (probably not enough
primarily relates to Mercer St being
IO - Improve Place quality
Composition and relationship of buildings and space
0
being able to be used as
to reduce by 1 point) if street to reduce by 1 point) if street
being able to be used as
to reduce by 1 point) if street to reduce by 1 point) if street
to reduce by 1 point) if street to reduce by 1 point) if street
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.19
1
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.19
1
able to be used as connection to
0.1
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.19
How connected does the place feel?
connection to civic sq and
widths remain without
widths remain without
connection to civic sq and
widths remain without
widths remain without
widths remain without
widths remain without
civic sq and along Willis
What is the level of activity promoted
along Willis
footpath widening
footpath widening
along Willis
footpath widening
footpath widening
footpath widening
footpath widening
Act
How comfortable does the place feel?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0.12 0.12 0.12 0.08
0.04
0.12
0.04
0.16
1.2
0.15 0.14 0.16 0.09 0.048
0.144
0.048
0.1936
1.6
0.2
0.18 0.22 0.16 0.192
0.192
0.192
0.192
PT & AT as more viable modes for
E - Social
0
all, greater ease of movement,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
greater PT efficiency, little
minimal change
minimal change
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.19
1
greater PT efficiency, little
minimal change
minimal change
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.19
3
minimal change
minimal change
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.5001
0.75
0.57
change in public space
change in public space
more space for social
What is the range of relevant stakeholder and community feedback
opportunititues
E - Retail Impact Assessment
What is the likely impact/opportunity to retailers and businesses?
0
Increased pedestrian congestion from
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Increased foot traffic and
Willis Street has 3 large
NA as no taxi stands on Willis 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.2
1
In addition to Option 1, two Assuming loading bays on the NA as no taxi stands on Willis 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.25
0.2
2
Signigicantly increasing amenity
Assuming loading bays on the NA as no taxi stands on Willis 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.2
0.2
0.3334
0.5
0.4
population growth, but CBD will always
pedestrian activity from 30%
loading bays that are well
Street.
bus lanes in each direction
GM can be accessed while all
Street.
with 75% more footpath space and GM can be accessed while all
Street.
attract people and patronage, not deter
more footpath space, however utlilised. Larger businesses
would improve transport
else remains constant,
provisions for bikes and scooters
else remains constant,
especially for Willis Street which is the
loss of efficiency/higher goods
such as New World have
networks, but no general
retailers would benefit as
outweigh the same magnitude of
retailers would benefit as
main 'high end' retail precinct along
damage/theft risk for
loading bays on Boulcott
traffic would limit access.
there are 3 large loading bays
negative impacts from Options 1 there are 3 large loading bays
with LQ. Hence, in the event of 'do
businesses from relocation of Street. Score could increase.
However, very little private
that are currently well
and 2. Modal shift allowances
that are well utlilised. Hence,
minimum', it would be expected to see
loading bays. No parking
transit and no parking as is,
utlilised. Hence, the score
create medium to long term
the score could increase.
growing levels of patronage as this is
spaces anyways in do
hence limiting access would
could increase.
benefits. Hence the higher score.
Wellington's premier retail precinct.
minimum so this would not be
not be a significant issue.
But questions around the reduced
impacted and very little/no
buslane causing bus stacking, hence
private transit.
decreasing transit amenity.
Still no cycle provision for
southbound cyclists. Northbound
Still no cycle provision for
Minimal change as
Minimal change as
Minimal change as
Minimal change as
cyclists continue to use general
Minimal change as
Minimal change as
Still no cycle provision for
No cycle provision for southbound
southbound cyclists.
northbound cyclists generally northbound cyclists generally
northbound cyclists generally northbound cyclists generally
traffic lane. Removal of indented northbound cyclists generally northbound cyclists generally
southbound cyclists.
E - Cycling Level of Service
0
cyclists. Northbound cyclists mix with
Northbound cyclists continue
take the lane already. Door
take the lane already. Door
take the lane already. Door
take the lane already. Door
bus stops and marking of in-lane
take the lane already. Door
take the lane already. Door
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Northbound cyclists to use bus
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
-0.17 -0.17 -0.17 -0.1
-0.1
-0.167
-0.1
-0.16
general traffic in a low speed
to use general traffic lane. See
zone is not a particular
zone is not a particular
zone is not a particular
zone is not a particular
bus stops means people on bikes
zone is not a particular
zone is not a particular
lane. See further comments in
environment.
further comments in "Fit with
concern for this section of
concern for this section of
concern for this section of
concern for this section of
have limited space to pass
concern for this section of
concern for this section of
"Fit with LGWM Programme"
LGWM Programme"
Golden Mile.
Golden Mile.
Golden Mile.
Golden Mile.
stationary buses. See further
Golden Mile.
Golden Mile.
What is the effect to cycling level of service?
What is the effect on perceived safety and comfort of cycling on the
comments in "Fit with LGWM
segment?
Programme"
General traffic removed and
Reduction in score due to
Reduction in score due to
Reduction in score due to
Information
E - General Safety
0
Reduction in score due to
Reduction in score due to
Mercer Street closed which reduces
Reduction in score due to
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
RT conflicts at Mercer St
manouevring of service
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.5
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.19
1
General traffic removed &
manouevring of service
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.5
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.19
1
manouevring of service
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.5
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.19
What is the general effect to road safety on the segment?
removed.
manouevring of taxis.
Mercer St closed
manouevring of taxis.
ped vs vehicle and vehicle v vehicle
manouevring of taxis.
vehicles.
vehicles.
vehicles.
What is the general effect to road safety on adjacent streets?
conflicts.
Potentially significant
E - Sustainability
To what extent does the option deliver against sustainabiltiy issues
0
Continued PMV preference, growth, and
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Minor improvement on key
mimimal change
minimal change
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.16
1
Minor improvement on key
mimimal change
minimal change
0.17 0.17 0.17
0.1
0.1
0.1667
0.1
0.16
3
improvement on key sustinability
mimimal change
minimal change
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.5001
0.3
0.48
bus congenstion
sustinability criteria
sustinability criteria
and aspects relevant and important to Wellington and Aotearoa?
criteria
minimal opportunity to
challenging to accommodate
challenging to accommodate
provide a safe and convenient
E - Fit with LGWM Programme
What is the alignment with linked projects such as MRT or central
improvements for people on
improvements for people on bikes
city cycling network?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
cycling movement between
mimimal change
minimal change
-0.17 -0.17 -0.17 -0.1
-0.5
-0.167
-0.1
-0.1
-1
mimimal change
minimal change
-0.17 -0.17 -0.17 -0.1
-0.5
-0.167
-0.1
-0.1
-1
mimimal change
minimal change
-0.17 -0.17 -0.17 -0.1
-0.5
-0.167
-0.1
-0.1
bikes or buses on these north-
or buses on these north-south
How much flexibility is there to integrate with linked projects?
Willis Street northbound and
south corridors.
corridors.
Mercer Street
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 -0.007 0.0167
0.06
0.0107
0.5
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 -0.007 0.0167
0.06
0.0107 1.1667
0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
0.01
0.0389 0.0483
0.046
DM&O - Delivery
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
No change in score
No change in score
-0.33 -0.33 -0.33 -0.3
-0.4
-0.333 -0.333
-0.4
-1
No change in score
No change in score
-0.33 -0.33 -0.33 -0.3
-0.4
-0.333 -0.333
-0.4
-2
No change in score
No change in score
-0.67 -0.67 -0.67 -0.7
-0.8
-0.666 -0.666
-0.8
DM&O - Operations and Maintenance
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-1
No change in score
No change in score
-0.33 -0.33 -0.33 -0.3
-0.2
-0.333 -0.333
-0.55
-2
No change in score
No change in score
-0.67 -0.67 -0.67 -0.7
-0.4
-0.666 -0.666
-1.1
-3
No change in score
No change in score
-1
-1
-1
-1
-0.6
-0.999 -0.999
-1.65
DM&O - Timeframe for Delivery
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
No change in score
No change in score
0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
0.8
0.666
0.666
0.1
2
No change in score
No change in score
0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
0.8
0.666
0.666
0.1
2
No change in score
No change in score
0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
0.8
0.666
0.666
0.1
Official
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.0267
0
0
-0.0283 -0.333
-0.02 -0.02 -0.02
-0
0
-0.022 -0.022 -0.0467
-1
-0.07 -0.07 -0.07 -0.1
-0.04
-0.067 -0.067 -0.1567
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.5
0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.06 0.14 0.1 0.14 1.3667
0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0.04 0.14 0.09 0.16 1.7667
0.2 0.2 0.2 0 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.08
the
under
Released
