<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" /> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit"> <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" /> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
Hi Liam,
Joe H reminded me of the lingering question about whether the cable car is “rapid transit”. The topic is unlikely to come up in tomorrow morning’s meeting, but if it does, the short story is that while the Cable Car appears to meet the ‘rapid transit’ criteria in the NPS-UD, GPS Transport and the One Network Framework (ironically given its 18 kmh speed), no-one has yet classified it as rapid transit. It remains under consideration.
Regards
Andrew
From: Adam McCutcheon <[email address]>
Sent: 16 March 2021 1:44 PM
To: Liam Hodgetts <[email address]>
Cc: Moana Mackey <[email address]>; John McSweeney <[email address]>; Joe Hewitt <[email address]>; Andrew Wharton <[email address]>
Subject: Memo - Background and current state of play: Rapid Transit Service and the NPS-UD
Hi Liam.
Andrew and I have prepared a memo for you following our discussion this morning on the NPS-UD and rapid transit services.
It documents work to date and suggested next steps.
Please find it linked below:
http://wccecm/otcs/llisapi.dll/link/30807892
Cheers,
Adam McCutcheon |
The information contained in this email is privileged and confidential and intended for the addressee only. |