This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Official Information request 'Information relating to the footage acquired from Jacob's report "Safety Assessment of Chews Lane Pedestrian Crossing"'.


 
By email 
Shed 39,
 
 2 Fryatt Quay 
Pipit
 
ea, Wellington 6011 
PO Box 1
 
1646 
11 September 2019 
Manners St
 
reet 
Wellingt
 
on 6142 
T  04 384 5708 
 
File Ref: OIAP-7-12392 
F  04 385 6960 
 
www.gw.govt.nz 
 
Hugh Davenport 
 
[FYI request #10836 email] 
 
Dear Mr Davenport 
Request for information 2019-256 
I refer to your request for information dated 29 July 2019, which was received by Greater 
Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) that day. You have requested the following information: 
“I would like to know: 
1) When each route 24 bus was seen going northbound for the morning of 2 May 2019, between 
7:30am and 8:30am. 
 
2) For each route 24 bus viewed on the footage, either (in order of preference): 
a) A video of the bus going through the intersection from both cameras of Jacob’s 
b) A still photo of the bus going through the intersection at the moment it crosses the intersection 
line (the end of the advanced cycle box) from both cameras of Jacob’s. Blurs can be applied quite 
easily for these still images to protect Privacy. 
c) A description of whether the light was green, amber, or red at the time the bus crosses the 
intersection line. Please note that I would expect either a or b to be provided instead of this. A very 
good reason for refusing a or b would be required. 
 
3) In order to correlate with actual traffic and to make sure that GWRC is not purposefully 
withholding results that show safety concerns, I would like to get the actual times that each route 24 
was in that area during that time period by using the real time information. 
 
4) If there are any buses shown as travelling in the area on the real time information, but were not 
found in the footage provided by Jacob's, then I would like: 
a) a photo of the rear advertisement on all the missing buses that were not found on video. The point 
of this is to match it with the video I have 
b) I would also like a brief explanation on why the bus was shown to be travelling on real time 
information, but was not found on the high definition camera feed that Jacob’s had used for the 
report. 
 

OIA 2019-256 HUGH DAVENPORT 


 
5) If any of the route 24’s in 2) were found to be crossing the intersection line on a red light, then: 
a) An explanation of why the Jacob’s report did not contain that incident in their report 
b) An explanation of why both the General Manager of Public Transport (Greg Pollock) and the 
Manager of Bus Operations (Matthew Lear, previously Health and Safety Manager) did not find this 
when requested earlier and both responded that there was nothing of concern with the report. 
c) An explanation of why multiple managers (Bruce Horsefield, Greg Pollock and Matthew Lear) 
have insisted there is no concern for safety after a large amount of evidence to the contrary. 
d) What actions GWRC will take to ensure the reliability of the Jacob’s report 
e) What actions GWRC will take to ensure that their Management team take safety reports seriously 
in the future. 
f) What actions GWRC will take to ensure that their Management team react quickly to safety 
reports in the future.” 

On 26 August 2018 we advised you that we were extending the timeframe to respond to your 
request to 10 October 2019. 
GWRC’s response follows: 
Parts 1, 2 & 3 of your request 
GWRC has decided to grant these elements of your request for information. However, given the 
amount of additional costs that GWRC will incur to process your information request, GWRC has 
decided to charge for making the requested information available.  
To respond to part 3 of your request a technical officer is required to search and retrieve detailed 
tracking information from Real Time Information (RTI) records and compare this detail with the 
Metlink bus timetable to accurately determine the bus and service number for each number 24 bus.  
We estimate that the work to research, retrieve and collate this information will take three hours.  
This information will also respond to part 1 of your request and should help you to ascertain “When 
each route 24 bus was seen going northbound for the morning of 2 May 2019, between 7:30am and 
8:30am”.  
In response to part 2 of your request, GWRC would like to provide you with an opportunity to view 
the requested footage (route 24 buses on 2 May 2019 between 7.30 am and 8.30 am – travelling in 
both directions) under the supervision of a GWRC officer at our office on Level 2, 15 Walter Street 
at a mutually suitable time.  Please let us know if you wish to take up this offer.   
We estimate that it could take up to three hours to review the footage in both directions (northbound 
and southbound), and allowing time for you to select the still images that you are interested in. If, 
after reviewing the footage, there are images of which you would like a copy, we would need to 
pixilate or obscure identifiable individuals, in order to meet our obligations under the Privacy Act 
1993. The time taken to process this part of your request would be charged in accordance with the 
Ombudsman’s guidance on charging and at the standard rate of $38.00 per half hour or part thereof. 
OIA 2019-256 HUGH DAVENPORT 
 
PAGE 2 OF 5 


 
A summary of the above identified charges is provided below. GWRC believes that this charging 
proposal is consistent with the Ombudsman’s charging guide (June 2017). 
Information requested 
Details of process to retrieve 
Estimate of office time involved 
information 
in processing request 
3) The actual times that each    Search and retrieve detailed 
We estimate that the work to 
route 24 was in that area during 
information for Route 24 
research, retrieve and collate this 
that time period by using the real 
Northbound services (for 
information will take a maximum 
time information. 
buses that tracked in the RTI 
of three hours. 
 
system).*Note that in some 
circumstances a bus may not 
be logged into and therefore 
tracked in the RTI system. 
  Provide details of schedule 
and deviation times when the 
Vehicle passed Stop 5006 at 
Manners Street and Willis St. 
  Provide details of schedule 
and deviation times when the 
vehicle passed Stop 5008 at 
Willis Street, Grand Arcade. 
  Provide Fleet # details.
2) For each route 24 bus viewed  Access to the requested footage 
 
on the footage. 
will be made available for viewing   
b) A still photo of the bus going  at the GWRC office at 15 Walter 
 
through the intersection at the  street. The following charges are 
 
moment it crosses the intersection  estimated in connection with 
 
line (the end of the advanced  viewing the requested footage: 
 
cycle box) from both cameras of    Supervising access (where the  View footage for 2 May 2019, 
Jacob’s. Blurs can be applied 
information at issue is made 
between 7:30am and 8:30am 
quite easily for these still images 
available for inspection) 
(northbound and southbound 
to protect Privacy. 
  Pixilate or obscure images of  directions), and identify still 
identifiable individuals within 
images for capture. We estimate 
any still images selected by 
three hours for this task. 
you in order to protect their 
The time taken to complete the 
privacy.   
pixilate or obscure the images will 
*    Note we estimate that it will 
vary depending on the number of 
take approximately five 
images required.  All charges will 
minutes per photo to prepare 
be made in accordance with the 
it for release. 
Ombudsman’s charging 
guidelines. 
OIA 2019-256 HUGH DAVENPORT 
 
PAGE 3 OF 5 


 
 
TOTAL STAFF TIME 
Estimated six hours plus any 
additional charges for preparing 
still captured images for release. 
Our charges are set as follows: 
  An initial charge of $76 for the first chargeable hour; and 
  Then $38 for each additional half hour or part thereof. 
These charges are inclusive of GST. 
GWRC has elected not to charge you for the first hour of officer time spent processing your request. 
Estimated 
time   6 
hours 
One hour free of charge 
 
1 hour 
Hours 
charged 
   5 
hours 
Charge 
per 
hour 
  $76 
($76 

5) 
   $380 
 
Total   

 
 
 
$380 
Deposit required (2 x hr min)  
$152 
To confirm your decision to proceed with this request can you please confirm in writing to Nichola 
Powell, email: [email address] and arrange to make the required deposit of $152 using 
the details set out below. We ask that you advise us of your decision by 18 September 2019, to 
enable your request to be met by the extended due date of 10 October 2019; please refer to our letter 
to you of 26 August 2019. 
The payment, including the initial deposit for $152, can be made to: GWRC bank account number: 
ANZ:   06-0582-0104781-00  
Particulars column: 
2019-256  
Reference column:  
 
A/c 16734 
email confirmation of payment to [email address] 
Please also contact Nichola Powell, at the above email address, to arrange a suitable time to view the 
requested footage.  
Note that GWRC is unable to commence any further work on this request until we hear from you 
and receive the required deposit. 
OIA 2019-256 HUGH DAVENPORT 
 
PAGE 4 OF 5 



 
Part 4) a) 
The Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 (the Act) enables people to 
request official information from GWRC. However, the Act only applies to information that is 
already held by GWRC. There is no obligation on GWRC to create information in order to respond 
to a request. 
The information you are seeking is not currently held by GWRC. I am therefore refusing your 
request under section 17(g) of the Act, because GWRC does not hold the requested information. 
GWRC believes that this refusal is consistent with the Ombudsman’s guide Information not held 
(November 2018). 
Part 4) b)  
Your request cannot be fulfilled as GWRC does not hold this information. This part of your request 
is for an explanation. 
I am therefore refusing your request under section 17(g) of the Act because GWRC does not hold 
any official information in this regard. 
Part 5 
Similarly, the requests in parts 5a to 5c cannot be fulfilled as GWRC does not hold this information. 
This part of your request is for an explanation. 
Your requests under parts 5d – 5f cannot be fulfilled as GWRC does not hold this information, as 
this is a request concerning future actions. 
I am therefore refusing your request under section 17(g) of the Act, because GWRC does not hold 
any official information relating to these parts. 
If you have any concerns with the decision(s) referred to in this letter, you have the right to request 
an investigation and review by the Ombudsman under section 27(3) of the Act.  
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Greg Pollock 
General Manager, Public Transport 
OIA 2019-256 HUGH DAVENPORT 
 
PAGE 5 OF 5